食管呼吸瘘管的内镜治疗

Brian Larson MD, Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE
{"title":"食管呼吸瘘管的内镜治疗","authors":"Brian Larson MD,&nbsp;Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE","doi":"10.1016/j.tgie.2019.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs) are pathologic communications between the esophagus and respiratory tract. They are devastating conditions of malignant or benign (often iatrogenic) etiologies. Patients with ERF have significantly increased mortality and decreased </span>quality of life<span><span><span>. Multiple management options exist for the treatment of ERFs including surgical, endoscopic, and oncologic approaches. Surgical management, with fistula closure and removal of diseased esophageal or pulmonary tissue, is the time-honored treatment of ERF. However, these surgeries are major undertakings and many patients with ERF are poor surgical candidates. As such oncologic and </span>endoscopic therapies are often employed. Many endoscopic therapies exist for the management of ERF and include: esophageal stenting, airway stenting, combined esophageal, and airway stenting, over-the-scope clip placement, cardiac septal occlusion devices, and other novel therapies (argon plasma coagulation, </span>fibrin glue<span>, endoscopic suturing, and polyglycolic acid sheets). These treatments can be employed alone or in combination. Each endoscopic management strategy has its own clinical success rate and adverse events. Although advances in endoscopic techniques have broadened the tools available to treat ERFs; little if any data are available comparing the various endoscopic management strategies. Despite this an experienced clinician may select the appropriate intervention to maximize the risks/benefits of the procedure based on the size, location, and etiology of the fistula.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":43887,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tgie.2019.03.012","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic management of esophagorespiratory fistulas\",\"authors\":\"Brian Larson MD,&nbsp;Douglas G. Adler MD, FACG, AGAF, FASGE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tgie.2019.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs) are pathologic communications between the esophagus and respiratory tract. They are devastating conditions of malignant or benign (often iatrogenic) etiologies. Patients with ERF have significantly increased mortality and decreased </span>quality of life<span><span><span>. Multiple management options exist for the treatment of ERFs including surgical, endoscopic, and oncologic approaches. Surgical management, with fistula closure and removal of diseased esophageal or pulmonary tissue, is the time-honored treatment of ERF. However, these surgeries are major undertakings and many patients with ERF are poor surgical candidates. As such oncologic and </span>endoscopic therapies are often employed. Many endoscopic therapies exist for the management of ERF and include: esophageal stenting, airway stenting, combined esophageal, and airway stenting, over-the-scope clip placement, cardiac septal occlusion devices, and other novel therapies (argon plasma coagulation, </span>fibrin glue<span>, endoscopic suturing, and polyglycolic acid sheets). These treatments can be employed alone or in combination. Each endoscopic management strategy has its own clinical success rate and adverse events. Although advances in endoscopic techniques have broadened the tools available to treat ERFs; little if any data are available comparing the various endoscopic management strategies. Despite this an experienced clinician may select the appropriate intervention to maximize the risks/benefits of the procedure based on the size, location, and etiology of the fistula.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tgie.2019.03.012\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096288319300129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096288319300129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

食管呼吸瘘(ERFs)是食道和呼吸道之间的病理性交通。它们是恶性或良性(通常是医源性)病因的毁灭性疾病。ERF患者的死亡率显著增加,生活质量下降。erf的治疗有多种选择,包括手术、内窥镜和肿瘤治疗。手术治疗,瘘关闭和切除病变食管或肺组织,是ERF的长期治疗方法。然而,这些手术是一项重大事业,许多ERF患者不适合手术。因此,肿瘤学和内窥镜治疗经常被采用。许多内镜下治疗ERF的方法包括:食管支架置入术、气道支架置入术、食管和气道联合支架置入术、镜外夹置入、心间隔闭塞装置和其他新疗法(氩等离子凝血、纤维蛋白胶、内镜缝合和聚乙醇酸片)。这些治疗方法可以单独使用,也可以联合使用。每种内镜治疗策略都有自己的临床成功率和不良事件。虽然内窥镜技术的进步扩大了治疗erf的可用工具;很少有数据可以比较各种内镜管理策略。尽管如此,经验丰富的临床医生可能会根据瘘管的大小、位置和病因选择适当的干预措施,以最大限度地提高手术的风险/收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic management of esophagorespiratory fistulas

Esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs) are pathologic communications between the esophagus and respiratory tract. They are devastating conditions of malignant or benign (often iatrogenic) etiologies. Patients with ERF have significantly increased mortality and decreased quality of life. Multiple management options exist for the treatment of ERFs including surgical, endoscopic, and oncologic approaches. Surgical management, with fistula closure and removal of diseased esophageal or pulmonary tissue, is the time-honored treatment of ERF. However, these surgeries are major undertakings and many patients with ERF are poor surgical candidates. As such oncologic and endoscopic therapies are often employed. Many endoscopic therapies exist for the management of ERF and include: esophageal stenting, airway stenting, combined esophageal, and airway stenting, over-the-scope clip placement, cardiac septal occlusion devices, and other novel therapies (argon plasma coagulation, fibrin glue, endoscopic suturing, and polyglycolic acid sheets). These treatments can be employed alone or in combination. Each endoscopic management strategy has its own clinical success rate and adverse events. Although advances in endoscopic techniques have broadened the tools available to treat ERFs; little if any data are available comparing the various endoscopic management strategies. Despite this an experienced clinician may select the appropriate intervention to maximize the risks/benefits of the procedure based on the size, location, and etiology of the fistula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is to provide a comprehensive, current overview of a clinical condition or surgical procedure in gastrointestinal endoscopy, combining the effectiveness of an atlas with the timeliness of a journal. Each issue places a vigorous emphasis on diagnosis, rationale for and against a procedure, actual technique, management, and prevention of complications. The journal features abundant illustrations, line drawings and color artwork to guide readers through even the most complicated procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信