Alev Atış Aydın, Kamuran Şanlı, Zuhat Acar, Sema Suzen Çaypinar, D. Acar, O. Şahin
{"title":"羊膜贴治疗自发性早产胎膜破裂及新生儿预后","authors":"Alev Atış Aydın, Kamuran Şanlı, Zuhat Acar, Sema Suzen Çaypinar, D. Acar, O. Şahin","doi":"10.31579/2642-9756/108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of amniopatch application in previable preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM) between 17-23 gestational weeks of pregnancy. Methods: 30 pregnants with previable preterm rupture of membranes were given amniopatch as therapy option instead of termination.After one week of antibiotics and bed rest the volunteers were applied amniopatch under sonographic guidance by infusion of 100 mL of 0.9% Isotonic solution alternate infusions of platelets, normal saline and FFP with a total of 100cc of each maximally were given into amniotic cavity. During infusion, in the event of bradycardia, the infusion was stopped. Results: 38 amniopatches were applied to 30 pPPROM patients. 7 aborted, 17 gave an immature birth and 6 gave preterm birth None reached to term. Alive birth rate was %23, All of them were born prematurely with changing durations in Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU). In the 7 alive newborns duration of NICU differed (10 days-91 days) with a mean of 44,5 days. Deepest vertical pocket normalized in only 4 of the 30 patients (13,3%) after one week. There were 2 ablatio plasenta cases, none born alive. Cesarean section rate was 6/30 (%20). Maternal complications were endometritis (5/30, 16%), chorioamnionitis 4/30 (13%) all cured with antbiotic regimens in one week, none had sepsis. Conclusion: Results of amniopatch treatment in pPPROM are not convincing, although you restore the amnion a little bit, the etiopathogenesis and underlying factors still exist and cause premature birth, resulting in neonatal complications.","PeriodicalId":93058,"journal":{"name":"Women health care and issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amniopatch Treatment in Spontaneous Previable Preterm Rupture of Membranes with Neonatal Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Alev Atış Aydın, Kamuran Şanlı, Zuhat Acar, Sema Suzen Çaypinar, D. Acar, O. Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2642-9756/108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of amniopatch application in previable preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM) between 17-23 gestational weeks of pregnancy. Methods: 30 pregnants with previable preterm rupture of membranes were given amniopatch as therapy option instead of termination.After one week of antibiotics and bed rest the volunteers were applied amniopatch under sonographic guidance by infusion of 100 mL of 0.9% Isotonic solution alternate infusions of platelets, normal saline and FFP with a total of 100cc of each maximally were given into amniotic cavity. During infusion, in the event of bradycardia, the infusion was stopped. Results: 38 amniopatches were applied to 30 pPPROM patients. 7 aborted, 17 gave an immature birth and 6 gave preterm birth None reached to term. Alive birth rate was %23, All of them were born prematurely with changing durations in Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU). In the 7 alive newborns duration of NICU differed (10 days-91 days) with a mean of 44,5 days. Deepest vertical pocket normalized in only 4 of the 30 patients (13,3%) after one week. There were 2 ablatio plasenta cases, none born alive. Cesarean section rate was 6/30 (%20). Maternal complications were endometritis (5/30, 16%), chorioamnionitis 4/30 (13%) all cured with antbiotic regimens in one week, none had sepsis. Conclusion: Results of amniopatch treatment in pPPROM are not convincing, although you restore the amnion a little bit, the etiopathogenesis and underlying factors still exist and cause premature birth, resulting in neonatal complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women health care and issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价羊膜补片在妊娠17~23周前置性胎膜早破(pPPROM)中的应用效果。方法:对30例可预见性胎膜早破的孕妇进行羊膜补片治疗,而不是终止妊娠。在服用抗生素和卧床休息一周后,志愿者在超声引导下,通过输注100 mL 0.9%等渗溶液,应用羊膜贴片。交替向羊膜腔内输注血小板、生理盐水和FFP,每种最多100cc。在输液过程中,如果出现心动过缓,则停止输液。结果:30例pPPROM患者共应用38片羊膜补片。7人流产,17人早产,6人早产,均未足月。存活出生率为%23,均为新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中早产,且持续时间不同。7例新生儿新生儿重症监护室存活时间不同(10天至91天),平均44.5天。一周后,30名患者中只有4名(13,3%)的最深垂直口袋正常化。消融性广场炎2例,无一例存活。剖宫产率为6/30(%20)。母体并发症为子宫内膜炎(5/30,16%)、绒毛膜羊膜炎4/30(13%),均在一周内用抗生素方案治愈,无败血症。结论:pPPROM的羊膜补片治疗结果并不令人信服,尽管你稍微恢复了羊膜,但病因和潜在因素仍然存在,并导致早产,导致新生儿并发症。
Amniopatch Treatment in Spontaneous Previable Preterm Rupture of Membranes with Neonatal Outcomes
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of amniopatch application in previable preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM) between 17-23 gestational weeks of pregnancy. Methods: 30 pregnants with previable preterm rupture of membranes were given amniopatch as therapy option instead of termination.After one week of antibiotics and bed rest the volunteers were applied amniopatch under sonographic guidance by infusion of 100 mL of 0.9% Isotonic solution alternate infusions of platelets, normal saline and FFP with a total of 100cc of each maximally were given into amniotic cavity. During infusion, in the event of bradycardia, the infusion was stopped. Results: 38 amniopatches were applied to 30 pPPROM patients. 7 aborted, 17 gave an immature birth and 6 gave preterm birth None reached to term. Alive birth rate was %23, All of them were born prematurely with changing durations in Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU). In the 7 alive newborns duration of NICU differed (10 days-91 days) with a mean of 44,5 days. Deepest vertical pocket normalized in only 4 of the 30 patients (13,3%) after one week. There were 2 ablatio plasenta cases, none born alive. Cesarean section rate was 6/30 (%20). Maternal complications were endometritis (5/30, 16%), chorioamnionitis 4/30 (13%) all cured with antbiotic regimens in one week, none had sepsis. Conclusion: Results of amniopatch treatment in pPPROM are not convincing, although you restore the amnion a little bit, the etiopathogenesis and underlying factors still exist and cause premature birth, resulting in neonatal complications.