产业政策经济学中的我们在哪里

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
D. Rodrik
{"title":"产业政策经济学中的我们在哪里","authors":"D. Rodrik","doi":"10.3868/S060–008–019–0015–2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on industrial policy has taken off, leading to a better understanding of when such policies effectively harness economic development. This article reviews the recent literature on the economics of industrial policies. Until recently, empirical studies on industrial policies came largely in one of two types: detailed country/region studies and cross-industry or cross-country econometric studies. I point out that the country/region studies had the usual problem that it was difficult to trace the effects of success to specific industrial policies, while the econometric studies suffered from the problem of misspecification. I show that a new generation of work has been moving us beyond the largely ideological debates of the past to a more contextual, pragmatic understanding.","PeriodicalId":44830,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Economics in China","volume":"14 1","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Are We in the Economics of Industrial Policies\",\"authors\":\"D. Rodrik\",\"doi\":\"10.3868/S060–008–019–0015–2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on industrial policy has taken off, leading to a better understanding of when such policies effectively harness economic development. This article reviews the recent literature on the economics of industrial policies. Until recently, empirical studies on industrial policies came largely in one of two types: detailed country/region studies and cross-industry or cross-country econometric studies. I point out that the country/region studies had the usual problem that it was difficult to trace the effects of success to specific industrial policies, while the econometric studies suffered from the problem of misspecification. I show that a new generation of work has been moving us beyond the largely ideological debates of the past to a more contextual, pragmatic understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Economics in China\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"329-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Economics in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3868/S060–008–019–0015–2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Economics in China","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S060–008–019–0015–2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

对产业政策的研究已经起步,使人们更好地了解这些政策何时能有效地驾驭经济发展。本文回顾了最近关于产业政策经济学的文献。直到最近,关于产业政策的实证研究主要有两种类型:详细的国家/地区研究和跨行业或跨国经济计量研究。我指出,国家/地区研究存在一个常见的问题,即很难将成功的影响追溯到具体的产业政策,而计量经济学研究则存在指定错误的问题。我表明,新一代的工作已经将我们从过去主要是意识形态的辩论中转移到了更具背景、更务实的理解中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where Are We in the Economics of Industrial Policies
Research on industrial policy has taken off, leading to a better understanding of when such policies effectively harness economic development. This article reviews the recent literature on the economics of industrial policies. Until recently, empirical studies on industrial policies came largely in one of two types: detailed country/region studies and cross-industry or cross-country econometric studies. I point out that the country/region studies had the usual problem that it was difficult to trace the effects of success to specific industrial policies, while the econometric studies suffered from the problem of misspecification. I show that a new generation of work has been moving us beyond the largely ideological debates of the past to a more contextual, pragmatic understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
373
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Economics in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers of economics in order to promote communication and exchanges between economists in China and abroad. It will reflect the enormous advances that are currently being made in China in the field of economy and society. In addition, this journal also bears the mission of introducing the academic achievements on Chinese economics research to the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信