顺铂-卡培他滨方案与奥沙利铂-卡培他滨方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效比较:一项准实验研究

M. J. Shams, Sajib Kumar Talukdhar, Mst Hasnahena Nargis, M. Ghosh, Md Masudur Rahman, Md Zakir Hasan, S. Alam, Md. Zillur Rahman Bhuiyan
{"title":"顺铂-卡培他滨方案与奥沙利铂-卡培他滨方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效比较:一项准实验研究","authors":"M. J. Shams, Sajib Kumar Talukdhar, Mst Hasnahena Nargis, M. Ghosh, Md Masudur Rahman, Md Zakir Hasan, S. Alam, Md. Zillur Rahman Bhuiyan","doi":"10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i3.63445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemotherapy is the primary therapeutic choice for advanced gastric cancer. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of the cisplatin-capecitabine regimen versus the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in treating advanced gastric cancer. Between February 2021 and March 2022, this quasi-experimental study was conducted on 64 advanced gastric cancer patients. Purposive sampling was used to include those who met the inclusion criteria and distributed them evenly between the two arms. Arm A got an injection of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) with oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), whereas arm B received an injection of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) plus oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. A final check-up was done at 12 weeks after the treatment. In arm A, 18 (56.2%) patients exhibited partial response compared to 15 (46.9%) in arm B. Stable diseases were also reported in both arms (18.8% in arm A and 21.9% in arm B). There were 8 (25.0%) cases of progressive disease in arm A and 10 (31.2%) cases in Arm B. The median progression-free survival in arms A (5.6 months) was almost similar to arm B (5.9 months). The most prevalent toxicities in both arms were vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, oral mucositis, paresthesia, handfoot syndrome, and renal toxicity. There were no statistically significant variations in outcomes between the two arms. In conclusion, the cisplatincapecitabine regimen is as effective as the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in advanced gastric cancer.\nBSMMU J 2022; 15(3): 180-185","PeriodicalId":8681,"journal":{"name":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative outcome of cisplatin-capecitabine regimen with oxaliplatincapecitabine regimen in advanced gastric carcinoma: a quasi-experimental study\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Shams, Sajib Kumar Talukdhar, Mst Hasnahena Nargis, M. Ghosh, Md Masudur Rahman, Md Zakir Hasan, S. Alam, Md. Zillur Rahman Bhuiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i3.63445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemotherapy is the primary therapeutic choice for advanced gastric cancer. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of the cisplatin-capecitabine regimen versus the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in treating advanced gastric cancer. Between February 2021 and March 2022, this quasi-experimental study was conducted on 64 advanced gastric cancer patients. Purposive sampling was used to include those who met the inclusion criteria and distributed them evenly between the two arms. Arm A got an injection of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) with oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), whereas arm B received an injection of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) plus oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. A final check-up was done at 12 weeks after the treatment. In arm A, 18 (56.2%) patients exhibited partial response compared to 15 (46.9%) in arm B. Stable diseases were also reported in both arms (18.8% in arm A and 21.9% in arm B). There were 8 (25.0%) cases of progressive disease in arm A and 10 (31.2%) cases in Arm B. The median progression-free survival in arms A (5.6 months) was almost similar to arm B (5.9 months). The most prevalent toxicities in both arms were vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, oral mucositis, paresthesia, handfoot syndrome, and renal toxicity. There were no statistically significant variations in outcomes between the two arms. In conclusion, the cisplatincapecitabine regimen is as effective as the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in advanced gastric cancer.\\nBSMMU J 2022; 15(3): 180-185\",\"PeriodicalId\":8681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i3.63445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v15i3.63445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化疗是晚期癌症的主要治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估顺铂-卡培他滨方案与奥沙利铂-卡佩他滨方案治疗晚期癌症的有效性和毒性。2021年2月至2022年3月,这项准实验研究对64名晚期癌症患者进行了研究。采用目的性抽样法将符合纳入标准的患者纳入研究,并将其平均分布在两个手臂之间。A组注射顺铂(第1天80 mg/m2)和口服卡培他滨(第1-14天每天1000 mg/m2),而b组每3周注射奥沙利铂(第1天达130 mg/m2)加口服卡培他滨(第1-4天每天1000 g/m2),共6个周期。治疗后12周进行最后检查。在A组中,18名(56.2%)患者表现出部分反应,而B组为15名(46.9%)。两组也报告了稳定的疾病(A组为18.8%,B组为21.9%)。A组有8例(25.0%)进行性疾病,B组有10例(31.2%)。A组(5.6个月)的中位无进展生存期与B组(5.9个月)几乎相似。双臂中最常见的毒性是呕吐、腹泻、贫血、中性粒细胞减少症、口腔粘膜炎、感觉异常、手足综合征和肾毒性。两组之间的结果没有统计学上的显著差异。总之,顺铂卡培他滨方案与奥沙利铂-卡培他宾方案治疗晚期癌症疗效相同。BSMMU J 2022;15(3):180-185
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative outcome of cisplatin-capecitabine regimen with oxaliplatincapecitabine regimen in advanced gastric carcinoma: a quasi-experimental study
Chemotherapy is the primary therapeutic choice for advanced gastric cancer. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of the cisplatin-capecitabine regimen versus the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in treating advanced gastric cancer. Between February 2021 and March 2022, this quasi-experimental study was conducted on 64 advanced gastric cancer patients. Purposive sampling was used to include those who met the inclusion criteria and distributed them evenly between the two arms. Arm A got an injection of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) with oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), whereas arm B received an injection of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) plus oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14), every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. A final check-up was done at 12 weeks after the treatment. In arm A, 18 (56.2%) patients exhibited partial response compared to 15 (46.9%) in arm B. Stable diseases were also reported in both arms (18.8% in arm A and 21.9% in arm B). There were 8 (25.0%) cases of progressive disease in arm A and 10 (31.2%) cases in Arm B. The median progression-free survival in arms A (5.6 months) was almost similar to arm B (5.9 months). The most prevalent toxicities in both arms were vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, oral mucositis, paresthesia, handfoot syndrome, and renal toxicity. There were no statistically significant variations in outcomes between the two arms. In conclusion, the cisplatincapecitabine regimen is as effective as the oxaliplatin-capecitabine regimen in advanced gastric cancer. BSMMU J 2022; 15(3): 180-185
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信