欧盟的贸易模式

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Claudius Gräbner, Dennis Tamesberger, Philipp Heimberger, Timo Kapelari, Jakob Kapeller
{"title":"欧盟的贸易模式","authors":"Claudius Gräbner, Dennis Tamesberger, Philipp Heimberger, Timo Kapelari, Jakob Kapeller","doi":"10.2298/eka2235007g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By studying the factors underlying differences in trade performance across\n European economies, this paper derives six different ?trade models? for 22\n EU countries and explores their developmental and distributional dynamics.\n We first introduce a typology of trade models by clustering countries on the\n basis of four key dimensions of trade performance: endowments, technological\n specialisation, labour market characteristics and regulatory requirements.\n The resulting clusters comprise countries that base their export success on\n similar trade models. Our results indicate the existence of six different\n trade models: the ?primary goods model? (Latvia, Estonia), the ?finance\n model? (Luxembourg), the ?flexible labour market model? (UK), the ?periphery\n model? (Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France), the ?industrial workbench\n model? (Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic), and the\n ?hightech model? (Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Finland,\n Germany and Austria). Subsequently, we provide a comparative analysis of the\n economic development and trends in inequality across these trade models.\n Inter alia, we observe a shrinking wage share and increasing personal income\n inequality in most of them, yet find that the ?high-tech model? is an\n exceptional case, being characterised by relatively stable economic\n development and an institutional setting that managed to counteract rising\n inequality.","PeriodicalId":35023,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade models in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Claudius Gräbner, Dennis Tamesberger, Philipp Heimberger, Timo Kapelari, Jakob Kapeller\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/eka2235007g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By studying the factors underlying differences in trade performance across\\n European economies, this paper derives six different ?trade models? for 22\\n EU countries and explores their developmental and distributional dynamics.\\n We first introduce a typology of trade models by clustering countries on the\\n basis of four key dimensions of trade performance: endowments, technological\\n specialisation, labour market characteristics and regulatory requirements.\\n The resulting clusters comprise countries that base their export success on\\n similar trade models. Our results indicate the existence of six different\\n trade models: the ?primary goods model? (Latvia, Estonia), the ?finance\\n model? (Luxembourg), the ?flexible labour market model? (UK), the ?periphery\\n model? (Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France), the ?industrial workbench\\n model? (Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic), and the\\n ?hightech model? (Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Finland,\\n Germany and Austria). Subsequently, we provide a comparative analysis of the\\n economic development and trends in inequality across these trade models.\\n Inter alia, we observe a shrinking wage share and increasing personal income\\n inequality in most of them, yet find that the ?high-tech model? is an\\n exceptional case, being characterised by relatively stable economic\\n development and an institutional setting that managed to counteract rising\\n inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Annals\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka2235007g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/eka2235007g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过研究欧洲各经济体贸易表现差异的潜在因素,本文导出了六种不同的贸易模型。研究了22个欧盟国家的发展和分配动态。我们首先通过基于贸易绩效的四个关键维度(禀赋、技术专业化、劳动力市场特征和监管要求)对国家进行聚类,介绍了贸易模型的类型学。由此产生的集群包括以类似贸易模式为基础的出口成功的国家。我们的研究结果表明存在六种不同的贸易模型:初级商品模型?(拉脱维亚,爱沙尼亚),金融模式?(卢森堡),灵活劳动力市场模式?(英国),外围模式?(希腊、葡萄牙、西班牙、意大利、法国)、工业工作台模型?(斯洛文尼亚、斯洛伐克、波兰、匈牙利、捷克共和国),以及高科技模式?(瑞典、丹麦、荷兰、比利时、爱尔兰、芬兰、德国和奥地利)。随后,我们对这些贸易模式的经济发展和不平等趋势进行了比较分析。除其他外,我们观察到大多数国家的工资份额在缩小,个人收入不平等在加剧,但我们发现,“高科技模式?新加坡是一个例外,其特点是经济发展相对稳定,制度环境成功地抵消了日益加剧的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trade models in the European Union
By studying the factors underlying differences in trade performance across European economies, this paper derives six different ?trade models? for 22 EU countries and explores their developmental and distributional dynamics. We first introduce a typology of trade models by clustering countries on the basis of four key dimensions of trade performance: endowments, technological specialisation, labour market characteristics and regulatory requirements. The resulting clusters comprise countries that base their export success on similar trade models. Our results indicate the existence of six different trade models: the ?primary goods model? (Latvia, Estonia), the ?finance model? (Luxembourg), the ?flexible labour market model? (UK), the ?periphery model? (Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France), the ?industrial workbench model? (Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic), and the ?hightech model? (Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Finland, Germany and Austria). Subsequently, we provide a comparative analysis of the economic development and trends in inequality across these trade models. Inter alia, we observe a shrinking wage share and increasing personal income inequality in most of them, yet find that the ?high-tech model? is an exceptional case, being characterised by relatively stable economic development and an institutional setting that managed to counteract rising inequality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Annals
Economic Annals Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Economic Annals is an academic journal that has been published on a quarterly basis since 1955, initially under its Serbian name of Ekonomski anali (EconLit). Since 2006 it has been published exclusively in English. It is published by the Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. The journal publishes research in all areas of economics. The Editorial Board welcomes contributions that explore economic issues in a comparative perspective with a focus on transition and emerging economies in Europe and around the world. The journal encourages the submission of original unpublished works, not under consideration by other journals or publications. All submitted papers undergo a double blind refereeing process. Authors are expected to follow standard publication procedures [Instructions to Authors], to recognise the values of the international academic community and to respect the journal’s Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信