书评:《爱尔兰的儿童与大饥荒》

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Marnie Hay
{"title":"书评:《爱尔兰的儿童与大饥荒》","authors":"Marnie Hay","doi":"10.1177/0332489320969995g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"text. It is important to remember that the number of manuscripts pertaining to Irish Presbyterians in the period surveyed are relatively few and far between. And those that do exist are often concerned with matters of a personal or political nature. The author has, nevertheless, made good use of the J. Gresham Machen papers housed in the Montgomery Library, Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, which include some crucial insights on the Davey controversy. Other readers may be disappointed that certain subjects are only addressed in summary form. For instance, the author’s discussion of the 1859 revival is a descriptive taxonomy of various opinions on the revival, which does not help the reader to determine which view was historically correct. Given the broad time frame and the range of topics that the book covers, however, it would be unrealistic to expect in-depth analysis of every subject addressed. One point that needs to be emphasised in relation to Henry Cooke is that his call for greater cooperation with the Church of Ireland was not, as his critics misrepresented it, a demand that they unite with those who persecuted their seventeenth-century forebears. Instead, Cooke was seeking greater unity with Church of Ireland evangelicals, many of whom were Reformed, while at the same time he denounced both the earlier Laudians and the contemporary Puseyites as cryptoRomanists. These minor points aside, The Irish Presbyterian Mind is an excellent overview of the intellectual history of an important Protestant group, and we hope that it will encourage further research in this neglected field.","PeriodicalId":41191,"journal":{"name":"Irish Economic and Social History","volume":"47 1","pages":"139 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0332489320969995g","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Children and the Great Hunger in Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Marnie Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0332489320969995g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"text. It is important to remember that the number of manuscripts pertaining to Irish Presbyterians in the period surveyed are relatively few and far between. And those that do exist are often concerned with matters of a personal or political nature. The author has, nevertheless, made good use of the J. Gresham Machen papers housed in the Montgomery Library, Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, which include some crucial insights on the Davey controversy. Other readers may be disappointed that certain subjects are only addressed in summary form. For instance, the author’s discussion of the 1859 revival is a descriptive taxonomy of various opinions on the revival, which does not help the reader to determine which view was historically correct. Given the broad time frame and the range of topics that the book covers, however, it would be unrealistic to expect in-depth analysis of every subject addressed. One point that needs to be emphasised in relation to Henry Cooke is that his call for greater cooperation with the Church of Ireland was not, as his critics misrepresented it, a demand that they unite with those who persecuted their seventeenth-century forebears. Instead, Cooke was seeking greater unity with Church of Ireland evangelicals, many of whom were Reformed, while at the same time he denounced both the earlier Laudians and the contemporary Puseyites as cryptoRomanists. These minor points aside, The Irish Presbyterian Mind is an excellent overview of the intellectual history of an important Protestant group, and we hope that it will encourage further research in this neglected field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Economic and Social History\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0332489320969995g\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Economic and Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0332489320969995g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Economic and Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0332489320969995g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文本。重要的是要记住,在调查期间有关爱尔兰长老会的手稿数量相对较少。而那些确实存在的,往往涉及个人或政治性质的问题。然而,作者很好地利用了存放在费城威斯敏斯特神学院蒙哥马利图书馆的J. Gresham Machen论文,其中包括对Davey争议的一些重要见解。其他读者可能会对某些主题仅以摘要形式进行讨论感到失望。例如,作者对1859年复兴的讨论是对复兴的各种观点的描述性分类,这并不能帮助读者确定哪种观点在历史上是正确的。然而,考虑到本书涵盖的时间范围和主题范围,期望对每个主题进行深入分析是不现实的。关于亨利·库克,需要强调的一点是,他呼吁加强与爱尔兰教会的合作,并不是像批评者曲解的那样,要求他们与那些迫害17世纪祖先的人联合起来。相反,库克正在寻求与爱尔兰教会福音派更大的团结,其中许多人是改革宗,同时他谴责早期的劳德派和当代的普塞派都是神秘主义者。撇开这些小问题不谈,《爱尔兰长老会思想》是对一个重要新教团体的思想史的极好概述,我们希望它能鼓励在这个被忽视的领域进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Children and the Great Hunger in Ireland
text. It is important to remember that the number of manuscripts pertaining to Irish Presbyterians in the period surveyed are relatively few and far between. And those that do exist are often concerned with matters of a personal or political nature. The author has, nevertheless, made good use of the J. Gresham Machen papers housed in the Montgomery Library, Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, which include some crucial insights on the Davey controversy. Other readers may be disappointed that certain subjects are only addressed in summary form. For instance, the author’s discussion of the 1859 revival is a descriptive taxonomy of various opinions on the revival, which does not help the reader to determine which view was historically correct. Given the broad time frame and the range of topics that the book covers, however, it would be unrealistic to expect in-depth analysis of every subject addressed. One point that needs to be emphasised in relation to Henry Cooke is that his call for greater cooperation with the Church of Ireland was not, as his critics misrepresented it, a demand that they unite with those who persecuted their seventeenth-century forebears. Instead, Cooke was seeking greater unity with Church of Ireland evangelicals, many of whom were Reformed, while at the same time he denounced both the earlier Laudians and the contemporary Puseyites as cryptoRomanists. These minor points aside, The Irish Presbyterian Mind is an excellent overview of the intellectual history of an important Protestant group, and we hope that it will encourage further research in this neglected field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信