{"title":"警务以外的性侵害","authors":"Gillian Harkins","doi":"10.1086/726480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Harm Beyond Policing\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Harkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spring 2020’s resurgence of Black Lives Matter protests crystallized longstanding organizing against policing and punishment. While these uprisings were neither new nor novel, throughout 2020 calls to defund the police gained greater political traction. Ongoing co-resistance organized across movements for Indigenous and Black lives and against settler nation borders contested the legitimacy of the U.S. as a colonial and racial state, while more mainstream media began to ask if carceral “abolition” could be a desirable, if not entirely practical, goal. While the resultant partial counter-hegemonies were viewed somewhat skeptically by those in existing abolitionist work, many also saw potential in the widening circulation of “abolition” as a concept. Activists and scholars seeking to dismantle often taken-for-granted systems of criminalization and punishment have drawn on W.E.B. Du Bois’s framing of “abolition democracy” in Black Reconstruction in America to connect struggles against racialized chattel slavery and its unreconstructed aftermath to later twentieth and early twenty-first century struggles against the “prison industrial complex” or “carceral state.” Even if curiosity, or skepticism, fueled some purchasers of Mariame Kaba’sWe Do This ‘Til We Free Us, its status as a New York Times bestseller held out hope that actual readers of the volume—along with other books soon to be published by influential abolitionists— might grapple seriously with calls to radically reconstruct existing systems toward a more just and equitable world.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.