《以诺记下》中的“朦胧之地”:关于它的起源,他们能告诉我们什么?

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Scrinium Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1163/18177565-bja10069
Liudmila Navtanovich
{"title":"《以诺记下》中的“朦胧之地”:关于它的起源,他们能告诉我们什么?","authors":"Liudmila Navtanovich","doi":"10.1163/18177565-bja10069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 2 Enoch is one of the Slavonic pseudepigrapha that has caused and continues to provoke controversy about its origin. In particular, there is no agreement as to whether it comes from Jewish or Christian circles. However, there is a consensus among Slavists on a number of questions concerning its provenance, and these conclusions made by philologists have been confirmed by the Coptic fragments of the text discovered in 2009, and the Slavonic manuscripts themselves give us a lot of information about the possible origin of the text. Among others, the examining of the “obscure places” in 2 Enoch permits us to give an opinion on its possible original, the article deals with the analysis of one of them. At the same time, the research into such readings also demonstrates a long and complicated history of the pseudepigraphon in Slavonic, which we should always have in mind while studying 2 Enoch.","PeriodicalId":38562,"journal":{"name":"Scrinium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Obscure Places” in 2 Enoch: What Can They Tell Us about Its Provenance?\",\"authors\":\"Liudmila Navtanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18177565-bja10069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 2 Enoch is one of the Slavonic pseudepigrapha that has caused and continues to provoke controversy about its origin. In particular, there is no agreement as to whether it comes from Jewish or Christian circles. However, there is a consensus among Slavists on a number of questions concerning its provenance, and these conclusions made by philologists have been confirmed by the Coptic fragments of the text discovered in 2009, and the Slavonic manuscripts themselves give us a lot of information about the possible origin of the text. Among others, the examining of the “obscure places” in 2 Enoch permits us to give an opinion on its possible original, the article deals with the analysis of one of them. At the same time, the research into such readings also demonstrates a long and complicated history of the pseudepigraphon in Slavonic, which we should always have in mind while studying 2 Enoch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scrinium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scrinium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrinium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2以诺是斯拉夫语的伪经之一,引起并继续引发关于其起源的争议。特别是,对于它是来自犹太还是基督教圈子,目前还没有达成一致。然而,斯拉夫人对其出处的许多问题达成了共识,文献学家的这些结论已被2009年发现的科普特文本片段所证实,斯拉夫手稿本身也为我们提供了大量关于文本可能起源的信息。除此之外,对《以诺书》中“隐晦之地”的考察使我们能够对其可能的独创性发表意见,本文对其中一个进行了分析。同时,对这些阅读材料的研究也表明了斯拉夫语中pseudepigraphon的漫长而复杂的历史,我们在研究以诺书2时应该始终牢记这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Obscure Places” in 2 Enoch: What Can They Tell Us about Its Provenance?
2 Enoch is one of the Slavonic pseudepigrapha that has caused and continues to provoke controversy about its origin. In particular, there is no agreement as to whether it comes from Jewish or Christian circles. However, there is a consensus among Slavists on a number of questions concerning its provenance, and these conclusions made by philologists have been confirmed by the Coptic fragments of the text discovered in 2009, and the Slavonic manuscripts themselves give us a lot of information about the possible origin of the text. Among others, the examining of the “obscure places” in 2 Enoch permits us to give an opinion on its possible original, the article deals with the analysis of one of them. At the same time, the research into such readings also demonstrates a long and complicated history of the pseudepigraphon in Slavonic, which we should always have in mind while studying 2 Enoch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scrinium
Scrinium Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信