研究指标在评估在线学习中的应用

K. J. Begum, M. Negahban
{"title":"研究指标在评估在线学习中的应用","authors":"K. J. Begum, M. Negahban","doi":"10.5812/ijvlms.94275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Training creative talents in the digital age is no longer restricted by geographical boundaries and this has been made possible through electronic and virtual learning (1, 2). Academic systems are now mandated with incorporating this new style of learning in their curriculums (3, 4). In this respect, higher education systems around the world have already started utilizing cybermetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics to pave the way for e-learning programs. The underlying question here is whether, in the light of recent developments in online education, it is possible to use research metrics as a modern means of evaluating electronic learning. To answer this question, one should first note that educational evaluation may serve a wide range of different purposes. Some common purposes include a better understanding of learning objectives and expected outcomes by the end of learning programs, effectual support for these programs and activities, responsiveness at all stages of the learning process, better communication and outreach in education, etc. Applying modern evaluation strategies will result in a more effective fulfillment of these objectives. On the one hand, it enriches teaching-learning interactions and enhances the learning experience in terms of efficiency and depth. On the other hand, it highlights the goals and expectations in educational environments. New evaluation methods also involve feedback analysis, which helps with managing the learning interactions, making the learning process a meaningful experience. In studies that integrate teaching and learning indicators, scientometrics is applied to assess the level of communication and efficiency in teaching-learning activities of individual learners. In this respect, two studies were conducted with the aim of evaluating academic groups and the quality of education received by graduates in the United States (5). They were among the first major studies in which a combination of publication indices and teaching-learning indicators was applied. In addition to the bibliometric indicators, the authors used the indicators of the effectiveness of educational programs and educational quality. Online learning can be evaluated through the qualitative assessment of technological competence using the indicators of technology diffusion and human skills. This assessment can be carried out by means of scientometrics and cybermetrics indicators. Knowledge assessment methods and indicators can also be utilized to evaluate learning (6). These indicators are considered among the key factors in scientometric studies. Machine learning is heavily dependent on the results of the scientometric analysis. In this regard, using visualization techniques in the areas of knowledge and learning and scientific mapping based on the philosophy of drawing the structure of texts, which have for a long time been popular in scientometrics, are on high demand for learning assessment. Therefore, online learning, as an innovative phenomenon, has turned into one of the most significant requirements of the modern age (7). At the same time, it should be noted that the nature and prospects of innovation are changing over time; hence, we need new assessment methods and indicators. Online learning is also a modern and innovative discipline closely intertwined with evaluation (8) and it is possible to evaluate it by means of research metrics. Applying these new methods will undoubtedly improve the quality of online learning. Using these principles and methods, we can achieve more qualitative results through measuring and evaluating the learning experience. The outcomes of these evaluations can","PeriodicalId":33759,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Research Metrics in Evaluating Online Learning\",\"authors\":\"K. J. Begum, M. Negahban\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijvlms.94275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, Training creative talents in the digital age is no longer restricted by geographical boundaries and this has been made possible through electronic and virtual learning (1, 2). Academic systems are now mandated with incorporating this new style of learning in their curriculums (3, 4). In this respect, higher education systems around the world have already started utilizing cybermetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics to pave the way for e-learning programs. The underlying question here is whether, in the light of recent developments in online education, it is possible to use research metrics as a modern means of evaluating electronic learning. To answer this question, one should first note that educational evaluation may serve a wide range of different purposes. Some common purposes include a better understanding of learning objectives and expected outcomes by the end of learning programs, effectual support for these programs and activities, responsiveness at all stages of the learning process, better communication and outreach in education, etc. Applying modern evaluation strategies will result in a more effective fulfillment of these objectives. On the one hand, it enriches teaching-learning interactions and enhances the learning experience in terms of efficiency and depth. On the other hand, it highlights the goals and expectations in educational environments. New evaluation methods also involve feedback analysis, which helps with managing the learning interactions, making the learning process a meaningful experience. In studies that integrate teaching and learning indicators, scientometrics is applied to assess the level of communication and efficiency in teaching-learning activities of individual learners. In this respect, two studies were conducted with the aim of evaluating academic groups and the quality of education received by graduates in the United States (5). They were among the first major studies in which a combination of publication indices and teaching-learning indicators was applied. In addition to the bibliometric indicators, the authors used the indicators of the effectiveness of educational programs and educational quality. Online learning can be evaluated through the qualitative assessment of technological competence using the indicators of technology diffusion and human skills. This assessment can be carried out by means of scientometrics and cybermetrics indicators. Knowledge assessment methods and indicators can also be utilized to evaluate learning (6). These indicators are considered among the key factors in scientometric studies. Machine learning is heavily dependent on the results of the scientometric analysis. In this regard, using visualization techniques in the areas of knowledge and learning and scientific mapping based on the philosophy of drawing the structure of texts, which have for a long time been popular in scientometrics, are on high demand for learning assessment. Therefore, online learning, as an innovative phenomenon, has turned into one of the most significant requirements of the modern age (7). At the same time, it should be noted that the nature and prospects of innovation are changing over time; hence, we need new assessment methods and indicators. Online learning is also a modern and innovative discipline closely intertwined with evaluation (8) and it is possible to evaluate it by means of research metrics. Applying these new methods will undoubtedly improve the quality of online learning. Using these principles and methods, we can achieve more qualitative results through measuring and evaluating the learning experience. The outcomes of these evaluations can\",\"PeriodicalId\":33759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijvlms.94275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijvlms.94275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尊敬的编辑,在数字时代培养创意人才不再受地域限制,这是通过电子和虚拟学习实现的(1,2)。现在,学术系统被要求将这种新的学习方式纳入其课程(3,4)。在这方面,世界各地的高等教育系统已经开始利用网络计量学、网络计量学和科学计量学为电子学习项目铺平道路。这里的根本问题是,鉴于在线教育的最新发展,是否有可能将研究指标作为评估电子学习的现代手段。要回答这个问题,首先应该注意的是,教育评估可能有多种不同的目的。一些共同的目的包括在学习计划结束时更好地了解学习目标和预期结果,对这些计划和活动提供有效支持,在学习过程的各个阶段做出反应,在教育中更好地沟通和拓展,等等。应用现代评估策略将更有效地实现这些目标。一方面,它丰富了教学互动,提高了学习体验的效率和深度。另一方面,它强调了教育环境中的目标和期望。新的评估方法还包括反馈分析,这有助于管理学习互动,使学习过程成为一种有意义的体验。在整合教学指标的研究中,科学计量学被应用于评估个体学习者在教学活动中的沟通水平和效率。在这方面,进行了两项研究,目的是评估学术团体和美国毕业生接受的教育质量(5)。它们是第一批将出版指数和教学指标相结合的主要研究之一。除了文献计量指标外,作者还使用了教育计划有效性和教育质量的指标。在线学习可以通过使用技术扩散和人类技能指标对技术能力进行定性评估来进行评估。这种评估可以通过科学计量学和网络计量指标进行。知识评估方法和指标也可用于评估学习情况(6)。这些指标被认为是科学计量学研究的关键因素之一。机器学习在很大程度上依赖于科学计量分析的结果。在这方面,在知识和学习领域使用可视化技术,以及基于绘制文本结构哲学的科学绘图,这在科学计量学中长期流行,对学习评估提出了很高的要求。因此,在线学习作为一种创新现象,已成为现代最重要的要求之一(7)。与此同时,应该注意到,创新的性质和前景正在随着时间的推移而变化;因此,我们需要新的评估方法和指标。在线学习也是一门与评估密切相关的现代创新学科(8),可以通过研究指标对其进行评估。应用这些新方法无疑将提高在线学习的质量。利用这些原则和方法,我们可以通过测量和评估学习体验来获得更多的定性结果。这些评估的结果可以
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying Research Metrics in Evaluating Online Learning
Dear Editor, Training creative talents in the digital age is no longer restricted by geographical boundaries and this has been made possible through electronic and virtual learning (1, 2). Academic systems are now mandated with incorporating this new style of learning in their curriculums (3, 4). In this respect, higher education systems around the world have already started utilizing cybermetrics, webometrics, and scientometrics to pave the way for e-learning programs. The underlying question here is whether, in the light of recent developments in online education, it is possible to use research metrics as a modern means of evaluating electronic learning. To answer this question, one should first note that educational evaluation may serve a wide range of different purposes. Some common purposes include a better understanding of learning objectives and expected outcomes by the end of learning programs, effectual support for these programs and activities, responsiveness at all stages of the learning process, better communication and outreach in education, etc. Applying modern evaluation strategies will result in a more effective fulfillment of these objectives. On the one hand, it enriches teaching-learning interactions and enhances the learning experience in terms of efficiency and depth. On the other hand, it highlights the goals and expectations in educational environments. New evaluation methods also involve feedback analysis, which helps with managing the learning interactions, making the learning process a meaningful experience. In studies that integrate teaching and learning indicators, scientometrics is applied to assess the level of communication and efficiency in teaching-learning activities of individual learners. In this respect, two studies were conducted with the aim of evaluating academic groups and the quality of education received by graduates in the United States (5). They were among the first major studies in which a combination of publication indices and teaching-learning indicators was applied. In addition to the bibliometric indicators, the authors used the indicators of the effectiveness of educational programs and educational quality. Online learning can be evaluated through the qualitative assessment of technological competence using the indicators of technology diffusion and human skills. This assessment can be carried out by means of scientometrics and cybermetrics indicators. Knowledge assessment methods and indicators can also be utilized to evaluate learning (6). These indicators are considered among the key factors in scientometric studies. Machine learning is heavily dependent on the results of the scientometric analysis. In this regard, using visualization techniques in the areas of knowledge and learning and scientific mapping based on the philosophy of drawing the structure of texts, which have for a long time been popular in scientometrics, are on high demand for learning assessment. Therefore, online learning, as an innovative phenomenon, has turned into one of the most significant requirements of the modern age (7). At the same time, it should be noted that the nature and prospects of innovation are changing over time; hence, we need new assessment methods and indicators. Online learning is also a modern and innovative discipline closely intertwined with evaluation (8) and it is possible to evaluate it by means of research metrics. Applying these new methods will undoubtedly improve the quality of online learning. Using these principles and methods, we can achieve more qualitative results through measuring and evaluating the learning experience. The outcomes of these evaluations can
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信