The anticapital theory of corruption and critique of concept of social capital

79 Introduction: This article is a critical paper related to outstanding paper, namely “Methodological and meaning critique of social capital” by Fariborz Raisdana in the 55th issue of the Journal of Social Welfare. Since the early 1990s the social capital appeared in the development lexicon as a positive phenomenon, in contrast to Marxist perspective that has always been theorized capital as a historically – specific social relation of class exploitation. In judging between two views, Raisdana defends the latter position. Theory of social capital mixed two domains “economic” and “non –economic” and allows researchers to import the concept of social in economic analysis through the backdoor. İn spite of two major theorists Coleman and Putnam this effort was unsatisfactory, because of its contradictory foundation and its impoverished notions of both the economic and social. Raisdana praises Fine because he critically regarded the issue and considered it as being contained disیعامتجا هیامرس موهفم دقن و یرادا داسف یا هیامرس دض هیرظن The anticapital theory of corruption and critique of concept of social capital