过失医疗造成的死亡:重新考虑巴瓦-加尔巴事件后重大过失杀人罪的作用

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Samanta, J. Samanta
{"title":"过失医疗造成的死亡:重新考虑巴瓦-加尔巴事件后重大过失杀人罪的作用","authors":"A. Samanta, J. Samanta","doi":"10.1177/0968533221992838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gross negligence manslaughter is a well-established common law offence in English jurisdiction. Nevertheless, it remains a troubled area of law. Academic commentators, as well as the Law Commission, have frequently called for reform. We explore this offence through the prism of medical manslaughter and argue that the offence is insufficiently nuanced in certain situations of death caused by gross negligence. This applies particularly to complex professional circumstances where a coalescence of inter-linking factors may converge with disastrous results for the parties concerned. Using the clinical care model as an exemplar, we argue that relentless focus on the offender can result in a disproportionately high level of blame being foisted on an individual. On the basis of decision theory, we suggest that insufficient regard may be given to confounding contextual matters. Failure to address underlying systemic factors may impede wider patient safety initiatives such as professional medical candour and strategies designed for institutional improvements directed at broader societal benefit. We offer an alternative approach based upon principles of fair attribution of blame and transparency. A new statutory offence is suggested for a fault-based standard that is set by law that gives greater prominence to contextual matters. We argue for wider disposal options that include ancillary court orders for rectification of systems failures and more proactive engagement of the coronial process.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"21 1","pages":"293 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533221992838","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Death caused by negligent medical care: Reconsidering the role of gross negligence manslaughter in the aftermath of Bawa-Garba\",\"authors\":\"A. Samanta, J. Samanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0968533221992838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gross negligence manslaughter is a well-established common law offence in English jurisdiction. Nevertheless, it remains a troubled area of law. Academic commentators, as well as the Law Commission, have frequently called for reform. We explore this offence through the prism of medical manslaughter and argue that the offence is insufficiently nuanced in certain situations of death caused by gross negligence. This applies particularly to complex professional circumstances where a coalescence of inter-linking factors may converge with disastrous results for the parties concerned. Using the clinical care model as an exemplar, we argue that relentless focus on the offender can result in a disproportionately high level of blame being foisted on an individual. On the basis of decision theory, we suggest that insufficient regard may be given to confounding contextual matters. Failure to address underlying systemic factors may impede wider patient safety initiatives such as professional medical candour and strategies designed for institutional improvements directed at broader societal benefit. We offer an alternative approach based upon principles of fair attribution of blame and transparency. A new statutory offence is suggested for a fault-based standard that is set by law that gives greater prominence to contextual matters. We argue for wider disposal options that include ancillary court orders for rectification of systems failures and more proactive engagement of the coronial process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Law International\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533221992838\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Law International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533221992838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533221992838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在英国,重大过失杀人罪是一种公认的普通法犯罪。然而,它仍然是一个法律上的麻烦领域。学术评论员和法律委员会经常呼吁改革。我们通过医疗过失杀人的棱镜来探讨这一罪行,并认为在某些由重大过失造成死亡的情况下,这一罪行的差别不够细微。这尤其适用于复杂的专业情况,在这种情况下,相互联系的因素的结合可能会给有关各方带来灾难性的后果。以临床护理模式为例,我们认为,对冒犯者的无情关注可能导致个人受到不成比例的高度指责。在决策理论的基础上,我们建议对混淆上下文问题的考虑不足。如果不能解决潜在的系统性因素,可能会阻碍更广泛的患者安全举措,如专业的医疗坦诚,以及旨在改善制度以实现更广泛的社会效益的战略。我们提供了一种基于公平归咎和透明原则的替代方法。建议为基于过错的标准制定一种新的法定罪行,该标准由法律规定,更加突出上下文问题。我们主张更广泛的处置选择,包括对系统故障进行纠正的辅助法院命令和更积极主动地参与加冕程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Death caused by negligent medical care: Reconsidering the role of gross negligence manslaughter in the aftermath of Bawa-Garba
Gross negligence manslaughter is a well-established common law offence in English jurisdiction. Nevertheless, it remains a troubled area of law. Academic commentators, as well as the Law Commission, have frequently called for reform. We explore this offence through the prism of medical manslaughter and argue that the offence is insufficiently nuanced in certain situations of death caused by gross negligence. This applies particularly to complex professional circumstances where a coalescence of inter-linking factors may converge with disastrous results for the parties concerned. Using the clinical care model as an exemplar, we argue that relentless focus on the offender can result in a disproportionately high level of blame being foisted on an individual. On the basis of decision theory, we suggest that insufficient regard may be given to confounding contextual matters. Failure to address underlying systemic factors may impede wider patient safety initiatives such as professional medical candour and strategies designed for institutional improvements directed at broader societal benefit. We offer an alternative approach based upon principles of fair attribution of blame and transparency. A new statutory offence is suggested for a fault-based standard that is set by law that gives greater prominence to contextual matters. We argue for wider disposal options that include ancillary court orders for rectification of systems failures and more proactive engagement of the coronial process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信