在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下进行的骨科前臂手术中,虚拟现实分心技术对焦虑和疼痛控制的疗效:一项随机对照研究

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
M. Gamal, A. Rady, M. Gamal, Haitham Hassan
{"title":"在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下进行的骨科前臂手术中,虚拟现实分心技术对焦虑和疼痛控制的疗效:一项随机对照研究","authors":"M. Gamal, A. Rady, M. Gamal, Haitham Hassan","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2223829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Virtual reality (VR) distraction has been considered an alternative to medication to treat acute pain related to different procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VR in reducing anxiety and pain in patients having orthopedic forearm operations under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial. Thirty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled for orthopedic forearm operations performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The patients were randomized into two equal groups. In the VR group, 15 patients performed the procedure with the use of VR and administration of midazolam according to the patient’s request, while in the control group, 15 patients received 2 mg midazolam followed by a titration dose according to the patient’s request. The primary outcome was the total intravenous sedation needed for the patient. Secondary outcomes included total perioperative analgesic utilization, incidence of harmful effects, patient satisfaction rating, and hemodynamic parameters. Results Virtual distraction technique significantly reduced the intraoperative midazolam consumption (2.00 ± 0.00 vs 6.67 ± 2.09 mg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The total perioperative analgesic consumption, incidence of adverse effects, and hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different in both groups. Patients who performed the block with the VR distraction technique showed better satisfaction scores compared to the control group (9.60 ± 0.51 vs 8.53 ± 0.92, respectively, p = 0.001). Conclusion In orthopedic forearm surgeries under supraclavicular nerve block, the VR distraction technique can reduce intraoperative sedation requirements and improve patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of virtual reality distraction technique for anxiety and pain control in orthopedic forearm surgeries performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"M. Gamal, A. Rady, M. Gamal, Haitham Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2223829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Virtual reality (VR) distraction has been considered an alternative to medication to treat acute pain related to different procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VR in reducing anxiety and pain in patients having orthopedic forearm operations under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial. Thirty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled for orthopedic forearm operations performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The patients were randomized into two equal groups. In the VR group, 15 patients performed the procedure with the use of VR and administration of midazolam according to the patient’s request, while in the control group, 15 patients received 2 mg midazolam followed by a titration dose according to the patient’s request. The primary outcome was the total intravenous sedation needed for the patient. Secondary outcomes included total perioperative analgesic utilization, incidence of harmful effects, patient satisfaction rating, and hemodynamic parameters. Results Virtual distraction technique significantly reduced the intraoperative midazolam consumption (2.00 ± 0.00 vs 6.67 ± 2.09 mg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The total perioperative analgesic consumption, incidence of adverse effects, and hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different in both groups. Patients who performed the block with the VR distraction technique showed better satisfaction scores compared to the control group (9.60 ± 0.51 vs 8.53 ± 0.92, respectively, p = 0.001). Conclusion In orthopedic forearm surgeries under supraclavicular nerve block, the VR distraction technique can reduce intraoperative sedation requirements and improve patient satisfaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2223829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2223829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of virtual reality distraction technique for anxiety and pain control in orthopedic forearm surgeries performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomized controlled study
ABSTRACT Background Virtual reality (VR) distraction has been considered an alternative to medication to treat acute pain related to different procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VR in reducing anxiety and pain in patients having orthopedic forearm operations under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial. Thirty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were enrolled for orthopedic forearm operations performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The patients were randomized into two equal groups. In the VR group, 15 patients performed the procedure with the use of VR and administration of midazolam according to the patient’s request, while in the control group, 15 patients received 2 mg midazolam followed by a titration dose according to the patient’s request. The primary outcome was the total intravenous sedation needed for the patient. Secondary outcomes included total perioperative analgesic utilization, incidence of harmful effects, patient satisfaction rating, and hemodynamic parameters. Results Virtual distraction technique significantly reduced the intraoperative midazolam consumption (2.00 ± 0.00 vs 6.67 ± 2.09 mg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The total perioperative analgesic consumption, incidence of adverse effects, and hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different in both groups. Patients who performed the block with the VR distraction technique showed better satisfaction scores compared to the control group (9.60 ± 0.51 vs 8.53 ± 0.92, respectively, p = 0.001). Conclusion In orthopedic forearm surgeries under supraclavicular nerve block, the VR distraction technique can reduce intraoperative sedation requirements and improve patient satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信