体育职前教师在线运动机能学课程的学术与社会参与

Q1 Social Sciences
Takahiro Sato, J. Haegele
{"title":"体育职前教师在线运动机能学课程的学术与社会参与","authors":"Takahiro Sato, J. Haegele","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate physical education preservice teachers’ academic and social engagement in an online life-span motor development course. This study was based on theory of transactional distance. Seven undergraduate physical education majors, who were enrolled in an online course at a Midwestern public university in the United States, participated in this study. Data collection included face-to-face open-ended interviews, bulletin board discussion logs, and research writing projects. A constant comparative method was used to interpret the data. Four interrelated themes emerged from the pr-service teachers’ narratives; transition from face-to-face to online course learning, socially acceptable and critical responses, lack of writing skills, and appreciation of instructors’ midterm evaluation. As online kinesiology courses continue to grow, success and failure of online courses should be gauged through instructional content, students’ grade-based outcomes, cognitive development, writing skills, course completion rates, and kinesiology course matriculation.","PeriodicalId":52191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","volume":"35 1","pages":"181 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Education Preservice Teachers’ Academic and Social Engagement in Online Kinesiology Course\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Sato, J. Haegele\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate physical education preservice teachers’ academic and social engagement in an online life-span motor development course. This study was based on theory of transactional distance. Seven undergraduate physical education majors, who were enrolled in an online course at a Midwestern public university in the United States, participated in this study. Data collection included face-to-face open-ended interviews, bulletin board discussion logs, and research writing projects. A constant comparative method was used to interpret the data. Four interrelated themes emerged from the pr-service teachers’ narratives; transition from face-to-face to online course learning, socially acceptable and critical responses, lack of writing skills, and appreciation of instructors’ midterm evaluation. As online kinesiology courses continue to grow, success and failure of online courses should be gauged through instructional content, students’ grade-based outcomes, cognitive development, writing skills, course completion rates, and kinesiology course matriculation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1619108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨职前体育教师在终身运动发展在线课程中的学业和社会参与情况。本研究基于交易距离理论。7名参加美国中西部一所公立大学在线课程的体育专业本科学生参加了本研究。数据收集包括面对面的开放式访谈、公告板讨论日志和研究写作项目。采用恒定比较法来解释数据。从服务教师的叙述中出现了四个相互关联的主题;从面对面到在线课程学习的过渡,社会接受和批判性的反应,缺乏写作技巧,以及对教师中期评估的欣赏。随着在线运动机能学课程的不断发展,在线课程的成败应该通过教学内容、学生的成绩、认知发展、写作技能、课程完成率和运动机能学课程的入学资格来衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical Education Preservice Teachers’ Academic and Social Engagement in Online Kinesiology Course
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate physical education preservice teachers’ academic and social engagement in an online life-span motor development course. This study was based on theory of transactional distance. Seven undergraduate physical education majors, who were enrolled in an online course at a Midwestern public university in the United States, participated in this study. Data collection included face-to-face open-ended interviews, bulletin board discussion logs, and research writing projects. A constant comparative method was used to interpret the data. Four interrelated themes emerged from the pr-service teachers’ narratives; transition from face-to-face to online course learning, socially acceptable and critical responses, lack of writing skills, and appreciation of instructors’ midterm evaluation. As online kinesiology courses continue to grow, success and failure of online courses should be gauged through instructional content, students’ grade-based outcomes, cognitive development, writing skills, course completion rates, and kinesiology course matriculation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信