教育中持续存在的偏见:呼吁研究将政策和实践从愿望转向结果

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jo Smith, F. Meyer, Heather McClure
{"title":"教育中持续存在的偏见:呼吁研究将政策和实践从愿望转向结果","authors":"Jo Smith, F. Meyer, Heather McClure","doi":"10.1177/14782103231180423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it seems the world has made significant social and political progress in the last 50 years by, for example, in many countries decriminalising homosexuality, ensuring greater freedom regarding gender identity, acknowledging women’s rights, or removing racist policies, in the last few years, the world seemed to have turned back into a direction that jeopardises the progress made. Educational institutions are often thought of as progressive spaces; however, the institutions themselves operate in a societal and political context that reflect beliefs – wrong or right – that societies hold. Education researchers and policymakers have attempted to conceptualise a response to address bias, but challenges remain. How policies that highlight the importance of inclusive learning environments, and a recognition and celebration of diversity translate into practice and whether the kind of change envisioned is actually taking place in classrooms and lecture theatres is not well documented. While studies have focussed on establishing the links between bias, teacher behaviour and student learning, few studies have documented effective and sustained efforts to dismantle bias in education. We take the stance in this paper that policies aimed at reducing bias can set parameters aimed at shifting practices, however, what is also needed are interventions at every level of the system to change biased beliefs of those implementing policies, leading in schools and teaching students in classrooms. However, typical professional development only highlights bias theoretically and is inadequate to change teachers’ beliefs. Without disrupting beliefs that perpetuate bias, policies remain aspirational, and intervention outcomes remain elusive. We know from decades of research that bias persists in educational systems, institutions and practices; what we need is research situated at the intersection of policy and practice so that we move from identifying inequities to documenting ways to address them.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The persistence of bias in education: A call for research to move policy and practice from aspiration to results\",\"authors\":\"Jo Smith, F. Meyer, Heather McClure\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14782103231180423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While it seems the world has made significant social and political progress in the last 50 years by, for example, in many countries decriminalising homosexuality, ensuring greater freedom regarding gender identity, acknowledging women’s rights, or removing racist policies, in the last few years, the world seemed to have turned back into a direction that jeopardises the progress made. Educational institutions are often thought of as progressive spaces; however, the institutions themselves operate in a societal and political context that reflect beliefs – wrong or right – that societies hold. Education researchers and policymakers have attempted to conceptualise a response to address bias, but challenges remain. How policies that highlight the importance of inclusive learning environments, and a recognition and celebration of diversity translate into practice and whether the kind of change envisioned is actually taking place in classrooms and lecture theatres is not well documented. While studies have focussed on establishing the links between bias, teacher behaviour and student learning, few studies have documented effective and sustained efforts to dismantle bias in education. We take the stance in this paper that policies aimed at reducing bias can set parameters aimed at shifting practices, however, what is also needed are interventions at every level of the system to change biased beliefs of those implementing policies, leading in schools and teaching students in classrooms. However, typical professional development only highlights bias theoretically and is inadequate to change teachers’ beliefs. Without disrupting beliefs that perpetuate bias, policies remain aspirational, and intervention outcomes remain elusive. We know from decades of research that bias persists in educational systems, institutions and practices; what we need is research situated at the intersection of policy and practice so that we move from identifying inequities to documenting ways to address them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231180423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231180423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在过去的50年里,世界似乎取得了重大的社会和政治进步,例如,在许多国家,同性恋合法化,确保性别认同的更大自由,承认妇女的权利,或取消种族主义政策,但在过去的几年里,世界似乎又回到了一个危及所取得进展的方向。教育机构通常被认为是进步的空间;然而,这些机构本身是在社会和政治背景下运作的,反映了社会所持有的信仰——无论是错的还是对的。教育研究人员和政策制定者试图将解决偏见的对策概念化,但挑战仍然存在。强调包容性学习环境重要性的政策以及对多样性的认可和庆祝如何转化为实践,以及所设想的这种变化是否正在教室和演讲厅中实际发生,这些都没有得到很好的记录。虽然研究的重点是建立偏见、教师行为和学生学习之间的联系,但很少有研究记录了消除教育偏见的有效和持续的努力。我们在本文中采取的立场是,旨在减少偏见的政策可以设定旨在改变实践的参数,然而,还需要在系统的各个层面进行干预,以改变那些实施政策的人的偏见信念,在学校领导和在课堂上教学生。然而,典型的专业发展只是在理论上突出了偏见,不足以改变教师的信念。如果不打破使偏见永久化的信念,政策仍然是雄心勃勃的,干预的结果仍然难以捉摸。从几十年的研究中我们知道,偏见在教育系统、机构和实践中持续存在;我们需要的是在政策和实践的交叉点进行研究,以便我们从识别不平等转向记录解决不平等的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The persistence of bias in education: A call for research to move policy and practice from aspiration to results
While it seems the world has made significant social and political progress in the last 50 years by, for example, in many countries decriminalising homosexuality, ensuring greater freedom regarding gender identity, acknowledging women’s rights, or removing racist policies, in the last few years, the world seemed to have turned back into a direction that jeopardises the progress made. Educational institutions are often thought of as progressive spaces; however, the institutions themselves operate in a societal and political context that reflect beliefs – wrong or right – that societies hold. Education researchers and policymakers have attempted to conceptualise a response to address bias, but challenges remain. How policies that highlight the importance of inclusive learning environments, and a recognition and celebration of diversity translate into practice and whether the kind of change envisioned is actually taking place in classrooms and lecture theatres is not well documented. While studies have focussed on establishing the links between bias, teacher behaviour and student learning, few studies have documented effective and sustained efforts to dismantle bias in education. We take the stance in this paper that policies aimed at reducing bias can set parameters aimed at shifting practices, however, what is also needed are interventions at every level of the system to change biased beliefs of those implementing policies, leading in schools and teaching students in classrooms. However, typical professional development only highlights bias theoretically and is inadequate to change teachers’ beliefs. Without disrupting beliefs that perpetuate bias, policies remain aspirational, and intervention outcomes remain elusive. We know from decades of research that bias persists in educational systems, institutions and practices; what we need is research situated at the intersection of policy and practice so that we move from identifying inequities to documenting ways to address them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信