外围聚合

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
M. Cevasco
{"title":"外围聚合","authors":"M. Cevasco","doi":"10.1017/pli.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I sat down to write these brief notes on Insurgent Imaginations, my first temptation was to juxtapose its project for world literature to liberal accounts. But this would only prove what readers of books like this already know, that is, the abysmal difference in relevance between Marxist and liberal discussions of the subject. The latter tend to be marked by the notion that world literature has transformed the globalized supermarket of written works of art into an Amazon, in which we can comfortably access cultural artifacts from the Aztecs to the Sumerians, and then consume them as an isolated experience. Rather than praising difference and variety, which do not relate, the effort here is to formulate the usefulness of the new discipline for a project of social transformation. Indeed, “the point is to change it.” To further this historical task, the book sets out to demonstrate the critical and political possibilities available to a reading of world literature from a peripheral point of view. This demonstration is carried out in constant dialogue with the Marxist tradition. To use a term coined by Fredric Jameson, the book presents an exercise in “cognitive mapping,” a way of doing what globalized capital denies, that is the possibility of coordinating local cultural productions with national or international ones, thus enabling perception of the totality that rules them all. This is accomplished by way of the invention of categories that guide the analysis of cultural products in such a way as to render visible structures of the specific conjunctures that frame them. As such, it is yet another example of the ways in which cultural materialism is a position that turn analysis into an instrument for discovering and interpreting social reality, to adapt Antonio Candido’s apt phrase.1 The aim is to contribute to turn world literature into a strategy of resistance. The result, once more, confirms that Marxism is the untranscendentable horizon of productive thought. There is no point, then, inwasting timewith comparisons with other approaches.","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":"9 1","pages":"411 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral Convergences\",\"authors\":\"M. Cevasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pli.2022.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When I sat down to write these brief notes on Insurgent Imaginations, my first temptation was to juxtapose its project for world literature to liberal accounts. But this would only prove what readers of books like this already know, that is, the abysmal difference in relevance between Marxist and liberal discussions of the subject. The latter tend to be marked by the notion that world literature has transformed the globalized supermarket of written works of art into an Amazon, in which we can comfortably access cultural artifacts from the Aztecs to the Sumerians, and then consume them as an isolated experience. Rather than praising difference and variety, which do not relate, the effort here is to formulate the usefulness of the new discipline for a project of social transformation. Indeed, “the point is to change it.” To further this historical task, the book sets out to demonstrate the critical and political possibilities available to a reading of world literature from a peripheral point of view. This demonstration is carried out in constant dialogue with the Marxist tradition. To use a term coined by Fredric Jameson, the book presents an exercise in “cognitive mapping,” a way of doing what globalized capital denies, that is the possibility of coordinating local cultural productions with national or international ones, thus enabling perception of the totality that rules them all. This is accomplished by way of the invention of categories that guide the analysis of cultural products in such a way as to render visible structures of the specific conjunctures that frame them. As such, it is yet another example of the ways in which cultural materialism is a position that turn analysis into an instrument for discovering and interpreting social reality, to adapt Antonio Candido’s apt phrase.1 The aim is to contribute to turn world literature into a strategy of resistance. The result, once more, confirms that Marxism is the untranscendentable horizon of productive thought. There is no point, then, inwasting timewith comparisons with other approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"411 - 416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2022.13\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2022.13","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我坐下来写这些关于反叛想象的简短笔记时,我的第一个诱惑是将其世界文学项目与自由主义叙述并置。但这只能证明像这样的书的读者已经知道的,即马克思主义者和自由主义者对这个主题的讨论在相关性上的巨大差异。后者往往以这样一种观念为标志,即世界文学已经将全球化的书面艺术作品超市转变为亚马逊,在亚马逊中,我们可以舒适地接触到从阿兹特克人到苏美尔人的文物,然后将其作为一种孤立的体验来消费。这里的努力不是赞扬不相关的差异和多样性,而是制定新学科对社会转型项目的有用性。事实上,“关键是要改变它。”为了推进这一历史任务,这本书试图从边缘的角度展示阅读世界文学的批判性和政治可能性。这种展示是在与马克思主义传统不断对话的情况下进行的。用弗雷德里克·詹姆森创造的一个术语来说,这本书提出了一种“认知映射”的练习,这是一种全球化资本所否认的方式,即协调当地文化生产与国家或国际文化生产的可能性,从而使人能够感知支配它们的整体。这是通过发明类别来实现的,这些类别指导文化产品的分析,从而呈现构成它们的特定连词的可见结构。因此,这是文化唯物主义立场的又一个例子,它将分析转变为发现和解释社会现实的工具,以适应安东尼奥·坎迪多的恰当短语。1其目的是帮助将世界文学转变为一种抵抗策略。这一结果再次证实了马克思主义是生产力思想的不可侵犯的领域。因此,浪费时间与其他方法进行比较是没有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peripheral Convergences
When I sat down to write these brief notes on Insurgent Imaginations, my first temptation was to juxtapose its project for world literature to liberal accounts. But this would only prove what readers of books like this already know, that is, the abysmal difference in relevance between Marxist and liberal discussions of the subject. The latter tend to be marked by the notion that world literature has transformed the globalized supermarket of written works of art into an Amazon, in which we can comfortably access cultural artifacts from the Aztecs to the Sumerians, and then consume them as an isolated experience. Rather than praising difference and variety, which do not relate, the effort here is to formulate the usefulness of the new discipline for a project of social transformation. Indeed, “the point is to change it.” To further this historical task, the book sets out to demonstrate the critical and political possibilities available to a reading of world literature from a peripheral point of view. This demonstration is carried out in constant dialogue with the Marxist tradition. To use a term coined by Fredric Jameson, the book presents an exercise in “cognitive mapping,” a way of doing what globalized capital denies, that is the possibility of coordinating local cultural productions with national or international ones, thus enabling perception of the totality that rules them all. This is accomplished by way of the invention of categories that guide the analysis of cultural products in such a way as to render visible structures of the specific conjunctures that frame them. As such, it is yet another example of the ways in which cultural materialism is a position that turn analysis into an instrument for discovering and interpreting social reality, to adapt Antonio Candido’s apt phrase.1 The aim is to contribute to turn world literature into a strategy of resistance. The result, once more, confirms that Marxism is the untranscendentable horizon of productive thought. There is no point, then, inwasting timewith comparisons with other approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信