制药行业实验室玻璃器皿清洁验证:案例研究

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Linda Belgacem, Redouane Amine Cherif
{"title":"制药行业实验室玻璃器皿清洁验证:案例研究","authors":"Linda Belgacem,&nbsp;Redouane Amine Cherif","doi":"10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Glassware cleaning is an essential part of pharmaceutical industry’s quality process, although, to date, no precise methodology is recommended by the pharmaceutical regulations. This study focuses on developing a detailed validation procedure for laboratory glassware cleaning and applying it routinely in quality control labs. The first step was the determination of the worst-case among raw materials controlled on a pharmaceutical site by using the failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) approach based on water solubility (WS), flask volume (FV), concentration (C), detectability (D) according to the absorptivity, and the probability (P) of the occurrence of the risk based on raw material analysis frequency. The adopted manual cleaning method was validated on three series of six flasks. Absorbances at <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> of cleaned and worst-case flasks were compared to the limit of detection (LOD). Methylparaben was found to be the worst-case. Cleaning validation was carried out on 50 mL flasks containing aqueous solutions at 0.11 g/L after a contact time of 20 min under stirring. A prewash with tap water, a proper wash with a 95-V/5-V water/detergent solution (quaternary ammonium), and a final wash with purified water were carried out. The absorbances of all the cleaned flasks were lower than those of the worst-case LOD (&lt; 0.0112). The selected cleaning procedure has been successfully validated. The proposed approach precisely describes the steps to be followed and can be adapted by other pharmaceutical industries as part of their laboratory glassware cleaning validation methodology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"28 2","pages":"59 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory glassware cleaning validation in pharmaceutical industry: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Linda Belgacem,&nbsp;Redouane Amine Cherif\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Glassware cleaning is an essential part of pharmaceutical industry’s quality process, although, to date, no precise methodology is recommended by the pharmaceutical regulations. This study focuses on developing a detailed validation procedure for laboratory glassware cleaning and applying it routinely in quality control labs. The first step was the determination of the worst-case among raw materials controlled on a pharmaceutical site by using the failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) approach based on water solubility (WS), flask volume (FV), concentration (C), detectability (D) according to the absorptivity, and the probability (P) of the occurrence of the risk based on raw material analysis frequency. The adopted manual cleaning method was validated on three series of six flasks. Absorbances at <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> of cleaned and worst-case flasks were compared to the limit of detection (LOD). Methylparaben was found to be the worst-case. Cleaning validation was carried out on 50 mL flasks containing aqueous solutions at 0.11 g/L after a contact time of 20 min under stirring. A prewash with tap water, a proper wash with a 95-V/5-V water/detergent solution (quaternary ammonium), and a final wash with purified water were carried out. The absorbances of all the cleaned flasks were lower than those of the worst-case LOD (&lt; 0.0112). The selected cleaning procedure has been successfully validated. The proposed approach precisely describes the steps to be followed and can be adapted by other pharmaceutical industries as part of their laboratory glassware cleaning validation methodology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"59 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

玻璃器皿清洗是制药工业质量过程的重要组成部分,尽管迄今为止,制药法规没有推荐精确的方法。本研究的重点是开发一套详细的实验室玻璃器皿清洁验证程序,并将其常规应用于质量控制实验室。第一步是采用失效模式效应分析(FMEA)方法,基于水溶性(WS)、烧瓶体积(FV)、浓度(C)、可检测性(D)(根据吸收率)和基于原料分析频率的风险发生概率(P),确定制药现场控制的原材料中最坏情况。采用人工清洗方法对三个系列的6个烧瓶进行了验证。将清洗后和最坏情况下烧瓶的λmax吸光度与检测限(LOD)进行比较。对羟基苯甲酸甲酯被发现是最糟糕的。在搅拌条件下,接触时间为20分钟后,对含有0.11 g/L水溶液的50 mL烧瓶进行清洗验证。用自来水预洗,用95 v /5 v水/洗涤剂溶液(季铵)适当洗涤,最后用纯净水洗涤。所有清洗过的烧瓶吸光度均低于最坏LOD值(< 0.0112)。所选的清洗过程已成功验证。所提出的方法精确地描述了要遵循的步骤,并且可以被其他制药行业改编为其实验室玻璃器皿清洁验证方法的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laboratory glassware cleaning validation in pharmaceutical industry: a case study

Glassware cleaning is an essential part of pharmaceutical industry’s quality process, although, to date, no precise methodology is recommended by the pharmaceutical regulations. This study focuses on developing a detailed validation procedure for laboratory glassware cleaning and applying it routinely in quality control labs. The first step was the determination of the worst-case among raw materials controlled on a pharmaceutical site by using the failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) approach based on water solubility (WS), flask volume (FV), concentration (C), detectability (D) according to the absorptivity, and the probability (P) of the occurrence of the risk based on raw material analysis frequency. The adopted manual cleaning method was validated on three series of six flasks. Absorbances at λmax of cleaned and worst-case flasks were compared to the limit of detection (LOD). Methylparaben was found to be the worst-case. Cleaning validation was carried out on 50 mL flasks containing aqueous solutions at 0.11 g/L after a contact time of 20 min under stirring. A prewash with tap water, a proper wash with a 95-V/5-V water/detergent solution (quaternary ammonium), and a final wash with purified water were carried out. The absorbances of all the cleaned flasks were lower than those of the worst-case LOD (< 0.0112). The selected cleaning procedure has been successfully validated. The proposed approach precisely describes the steps to be followed and can be adapted by other pharmaceutical industries as part of their laboratory glassware cleaning validation methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信