公民财富基金案例

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Lansley, D. Mccann, Steve Schifferes
{"title":"公民财富基金案例","authors":"S. Lansley, D. Mccann, Steve Schifferes","doi":"10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizens' wealth funds (CWFs) can be a key tool in tackling the growing disparity of wealth between the public and private sector and helping improve inter-generational fairness. They can also be a powerful pro-equality force. Such funds would be commercially managed and independently run, but held in trust for the public, with the dividends but not the capital used for social purposes. Some governments (including Singapore, Alaska, Australia and Norway) have successfully built up large funds, using the proceeds of natural resource extraction or privatisation. Getting public buy-in is the key to the success of such funds - and some of the most successful hypothecate the revenues to specific aims, for example a citizen's annual dividend (a kind of basic income) or to pay government pensions.","PeriodicalId":35027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for citizens' wealth funds\",\"authors\":\"S. Lansley, D. Mccann, Steve Schifferes\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citizens' wealth funds (CWFs) can be a key tool in tackling the growing disparity of wealth between the public and private sector and helping improve inter-generational fairness. They can also be a powerful pro-equality force. Such funds would be commercially managed and independently run, but held in trust for the public, with the dividends but not the capital used for social purposes. Some governments (including Singapore, Alaska, Australia and Norway) have successfully built up large funds, using the proceeds of natural resource extraction or privatisation. Getting public buy-in is the key to the success of such funds - and some of the most successful hypothecate the revenues to specific aims, for example a citizen's annual dividend (a kind of basic income) or to pay government pensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

公民财富基金(CWFs)可以成为解决公共和私营部门之间日益扩大的财富差距和帮助改善代际公平的关键工具。他们也可以成为一股强大的支持平等的力量。这些基金将由商业管理和独立运营,但由公众托管,股息而非资本用于社会目的。一些政府(包括新加坡、阿拉斯加、澳大利亚和挪威)利用自然资源开采或私有化的收益,成功地建立了大型基金。获得公众支持是此类基金成功的关键——一些最成功的基金将收入用于特定目的,例如公民的年度股息(一种基本收入)或支付政府养老金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The case for citizens' wealth funds
Citizens' wealth funds (CWFs) can be a key tool in tackling the growing disparity of wealth between the public and private sector and helping improve inter-generational fairness. They can also be a powerful pro-equality force. Such funds would be commercially managed and independently run, but held in trust for the public, with the dividends but not the capital used for social purposes. Some governments (including Singapore, Alaska, Australia and Norway) have successfully built up large funds, using the proceeds of natural resource extraction or privatisation. Getting public buy-in is the key to the success of such funds - and some of the most successful hypothecate the revenues to specific aims, for example a citizen's annual dividend (a kind of basic income) or to pay government pensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Policy
International Journal of Public Policy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The IJPP proposes and fosters discussion on public policy issues facing nation states and national and supranational organisations, including governments, and how these diverse groups approach and solve common public policy problems. The emphasis will be on governance, accountability, the creation of wealth and wellbeing, and the implications policy choices have on nation states and their citizens. This perspective acknowledges that public policy choice and execution is complex and has ramifications on the welfare of citizens; and that, despite national differences, the actions of nation states are constrained by policies determined by supranational bodies, some of which are not directly accountable to any international body.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信