半导体行业的追赶:中国和马来西亚的经验比较

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Hongchuan Wang, G. Lim
{"title":"半导体行业的追赶:中国和马来西亚的经验比较","authors":"Hongchuan Wang, G. Lim","doi":"10.1080/19761597.2021.2007144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper compares the paths of development taken by China and Malaysia in their attempts to pursue catching-up. While both China and Malaysia rely to a large extent on attracting foreign direct investment, China has, since its economic liberalisation in the late 1970s, implemented a more proactive set of industrial policy to embed foreign know-how and promote domestic technological deepening. This is illustrated through a comparison of the evolution of the Chinese and Malaysian semiconductor (upstream) industry. Although their progress remains tentative at this stage, China seems to be showing more concrete signs of technological and industrial sophistication than Malaysia. Such mastery is a useful platform for Chinese firms to progressively climb the technological ladder and to capture more value from the production and sales of increasingly complex goods and services. The principles discussed in this paper provide policy lessons, or at least some initial guidance, for other developing economies aspiring to move up the value chain.","PeriodicalId":45884,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","volume":"31 1","pages":"49 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catching-up in the semiconductor industry: comparing the Chinese and Malaysian experience\",\"authors\":\"Hongchuan Wang, G. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19761597.2021.2007144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper compares the paths of development taken by China and Malaysia in their attempts to pursue catching-up. While both China and Malaysia rely to a large extent on attracting foreign direct investment, China has, since its economic liberalisation in the late 1970s, implemented a more proactive set of industrial policy to embed foreign know-how and promote domestic technological deepening. This is illustrated through a comparison of the evolution of the Chinese and Malaysian semiconductor (upstream) industry. Although their progress remains tentative at this stage, China seems to be showing more concrete signs of technological and industrial sophistication than Malaysia. Such mastery is a useful platform for Chinese firms to progressively climb the technological ladder and to capture more value from the production and sales of increasingly complex goods and services. The principles discussed in this paper provide policy lessons, or at least some initial guidance, for other developing economies aspiring to move up the value chain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.2007144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.2007144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了中国和马来西亚在追求追赶过程中所走的发展道路。虽然中国和马来西亚在很大程度上都依赖于吸引外国直接投资,但自20世纪70年代末经济自由化以来,中国实施了一套更加积极的产业政策,以嵌入外国技术,促进国内技术深化。这是通过比较中国和马来西亚半导体(上游)产业的演变来说明的。尽管在现阶段,他们的进展仍然是试探性的,但中国似乎比马来西亚表现出了更具体的技术和工业成熟迹象。这种精通为中国企业提供了一个有用的平台,使其能够逐步攀登技术阶梯,并从日益复杂的商品和服务的生产和销售中获得更多价值。本文讨论的原则为其他希望向价值链上游发展的发展中经济体提供了政策教训,或者至少提供了一些初步指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catching-up in the semiconductor industry: comparing the Chinese and Malaysian experience
ABSTRACT This paper compares the paths of development taken by China and Malaysia in their attempts to pursue catching-up. While both China and Malaysia rely to a large extent on attracting foreign direct investment, China has, since its economic liberalisation in the late 1970s, implemented a more proactive set of industrial policy to embed foreign know-how and promote domestic technological deepening. This is illustrated through a comparison of the evolution of the Chinese and Malaysian semiconductor (upstream) industry. Although their progress remains tentative at this stage, China seems to be showing more concrete signs of technological and industrial sophistication than Malaysia. Such mastery is a useful platform for Chinese firms to progressively climb the technological ladder and to capture more value from the production and sales of increasingly complex goods and services. The principles discussed in this paper provide policy lessons, or at least some initial guidance, for other developing economies aspiring to move up the value chain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信