M. Muszyński
{"title":"Etapy ewaluacji badań jakościowych – perspektywa konstruktywistyczna","authors":"M. Muszyński","doi":"10.12775/RA.2018.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the evaluation stages of qualitative research within the constructivist approach. The stages can be placed on a continuum and treated as the obverse and reverse of the same internally diverse phenomenon. Differences described in analyses of individual development stages of these criteria are related to major influences of different paradigms. The whole allows us to see the crystallisation of the research practice that has different values depending on its version. During the first stage, criteria of research evaluation are strongly influenced by the positivist and post-positivist paradigms. In the second stage, they become a direct emanation of proper constructivist assumptions. In the following stage, one can see the process of gradual emancipation of the research practice from the straitjacket of fixed assumptions; when each time researchers make pragmatic assumptions, they select a set of specific criteria of research quality. During the final stage, the researcher is rehabilitated as the most important instrument of cognition. Verifiability of such research refers to the researcher’s skills and sensitivity, self-control, and interpersonal exchange of knowledge. The evaluation criteria developed in the article can be treated as guidelines supporting the process of designing and conducting qualitative research. Their application might contribute to maintaining high quality of research.","PeriodicalId":33591,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Andragogiczny","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Andragogiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/RA.2018.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了建构主义方法中定性研究的评价阶段。这些阶段可以放在一个连续体上,并被视为同一内部多样现象的正面和反面。这些标准的个体发展阶段分析中所描述的差异与不同范式的主要影响有关。整体上,我们可以看到研究实践的具体化,根据其版本,研究实践具有不同的价值。在第一阶段,研究评价标准受到实证主义和后实证主义范式的强烈影响。在第二阶段,它们成为正确的建构主义假设的直接产物。在接下来的阶段,我们可以看到研究实践从固定假设的束缚中逐渐解放出来的过程;当研究者每次做出务实的假设时,他们都会选择一套具体的研究质量标准。在最后阶段,研究者被恢复为最重要的认知工具。此类研究的可验证性是指研究人员的技能和敏感性、自制力以及人际知识交流。文章中制定的评估标准可以被视为支持设计和进行定性研究过程的指南。它们的应用可能有助于保持高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Etapy ewaluacji badań jakościowych – perspektywa konstruktywistyczna
The article presents the evaluation stages of qualitative research within the constructivist approach. The stages can be placed on a continuum and treated as the obverse and reverse of the same internally diverse phenomenon. Differences described in analyses of individual development stages of these criteria are related to major influences of different paradigms. The whole allows us to see the crystallisation of the research practice that has different values depending on its version. During the first stage, criteria of research evaluation are strongly influenced by the positivist and post-positivist paradigms. In the second stage, they become a direct emanation of proper constructivist assumptions. In the following stage, one can see the process of gradual emancipation of the research practice from the straitjacket of fixed assumptions; when each time researchers make pragmatic assumptions, they select a set of specific criteria of research quality. During the final stage, the researcher is rehabilitated as the most important instrument of cognition. Verifiability of such research refers to the researcher’s skills and sensitivity, self-control, and interpersonal exchange of knowledge. The evaluation criteria developed in the article can be treated as guidelines supporting the process of designing and conducting qualitative research. Their application might contribute to maintaining high quality of research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信