苏丹和南苏丹对阿卜耶伊的主权争议:未来的挑战

Diriba Mangasha Dabala, Tariku Raga Lencho
{"title":"苏丹和南苏丹对阿卜耶伊的主权争议:未来的挑战","authors":"Diriba Mangasha Dabala, Tariku Raga Lencho","doi":"10.17265/2328-2134/2020.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on examining entangled factors that complicate the claim over Abyei and have thereby hindered any peaceful settlement of the dispute on the county. Many works of literature that presented the conflict in Abyei as natural resource conflict or identity-driven within a broader picture of conflicts in Sudan are factually flawed and poorly explained the nature and causes of the conflict. This paper contends that multiplicity of factors has reinforced each other, thus these factors in unison created a stalemate and continuing claim over Abyei. In examining these interwoven factors, the paper employed a qualitative approach to conduct the study. Both primary and secondary data sources were used adequately. Various academic pieces of literature, researches, and conference reports have been used as secondary data sources. Key informant interviews were used to gather primary data to test secondary sources. Hence, the study comes up with three basic findings. First, claim over Abyei has been sustained by the elites’ manipulation of identity for their political and economic goals that hinder peaceful co-existence among communities in Abyei. Second, the competition over resources chiefly oil and locally, pasture and water complicated already fragile and tense relation by alluring national actors that even more protracted conflict on the ground to control these resources. Finally, the double standard in U.S. policy towards Abyei, by and large, helps Khartoum to continue its obstruction tactics to maintain the status quo.","PeriodicalId":70059,"journal":{"name":"国际关系与外交:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contending Claim Over Abyei by Sudan and South Sudan: Challenges Ahead\",\"authors\":\"Diriba Mangasha Dabala, Tariku Raga Lencho\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2328-2134/2020.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on examining entangled factors that complicate the claim over Abyei and have thereby hindered any peaceful settlement of the dispute on the county. Many works of literature that presented the conflict in Abyei as natural resource conflict or identity-driven within a broader picture of conflicts in Sudan are factually flawed and poorly explained the nature and causes of the conflict. This paper contends that multiplicity of factors has reinforced each other, thus these factors in unison created a stalemate and continuing claim over Abyei. In examining these interwoven factors, the paper employed a qualitative approach to conduct the study. Both primary and secondary data sources were used adequately. Various academic pieces of literature, researches, and conference reports have been used as secondary data sources. Key informant interviews were used to gather primary data to test secondary sources. Hence, the study comes up with three basic findings. First, claim over Abyei has been sustained by the elites’ manipulation of identity for their political and economic goals that hinder peaceful co-existence among communities in Abyei. Second, the competition over resources chiefly oil and locally, pasture and water complicated already fragile and tense relation by alluring national actors that even more protracted conflict on the ground to control these resources. Finally, the double standard in U.S. policy towards Abyei, by and large, helps Khartoum to continue its obstruction tactics to maintain the status quo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":70059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际关系与外交:英文版\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际关系与外交:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2134/2020.06.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际关系与外交:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2134/2020.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的重点是审查使对阿卜耶伊的主张复杂化的错综复杂的因素,从而阻碍了该县争端的任何和平解决。许多将阿卜耶伊冲突描述为自然资源冲突或在更广泛的苏丹冲突图景中由身份驱动的文学作品在事实上存在缺陷,对冲突的性质和原因解释不足。本文认为,多种因素相互加强,因此这些因素共同造成了对阿卜耶伊的僵局和持续的主权要求。在考察这些相互交织的因素时,本文采用了定性的方法进行研究。充分利用了主要和次要数据来源。各种学术文献、研究和会议报告已被用作次要数据来源。关键线人访谈用于收集主要数据,以检验次要来源。因此,这项研究得出了三个基本结论。首先,精英们为了政治和经济目标而操纵身份,阻碍了阿卜耶伊各社区之间的和平共处,从而维持了对阿卜耶依的主权主张。其次,对资源的竞争——主要是石油和当地、牧场和水——使本已脆弱和紧张的关系复杂化,国家行为者为了控制这些资源而在当地发生了更旷日持久的冲突。最后,总的来说,美国对阿卜耶伊政策的双重标准有助于喀土穆继续其阻挠战术,以维持现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Contending Claim Over Abyei by Sudan and South Sudan: Challenges Ahead
This article focuses on examining entangled factors that complicate the claim over Abyei and have thereby hindered any peaceful settlement of the dispute on the county. Many works of literature that presented the conflict in Abyei as natural resource conflict or identity-driven within a broader picture of conflicts in Sudan are factually flawed and poorly explained the nature and causes of the conflict. This paper contends that multiplicity of factors has reinforced each other, thus these factors in unison created a stalemate and continuing claim over Abyei. In examining these interwoven factors, the paper employed a qualitative approach to conduct the study. Both primary and secondary data sources were used adequately. Various academic pieces of literature, researches, and conference reports have been used as secondary data sources. Key informant interviews were used to gather primary data to test secondary sources. Hence, the study comes up with three basic findings. First, claim over Abyei has been sustained by the elites’ manipulation of identity for their political and economic goals that hinder peaceful co-existence among communities in Abyei. Second, the competition over resources chiefly oil and locally, pasture and water complicated already fragile and tense relation by alluring national actors that even more protracted conflict on the ground to control these resources. Finally, the double standard in U.S. policy towards Abyei, by and large, helps Khartoum to continue its obstruction tactics to maintain the status quo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
411
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信