正确对待不平等:美国承诺重塑的祖子视角

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Keith D. Revell
{"title":"正确对待不平等:美国承诺重塑的祖子视角","authors":"Keith D. Revell","doi":"10.3138/ttr.43.2.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay draws on Zunz's major works to show how the reformulation of the American Promise between, roughly, 1870 and 1960 established a new relationship between inequality and solidarity. I argue that Zunz's analysis demonstrates that the emerging white-collar middle class responded to the crises of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries with three cultural innovations—recodifying status, engineering social harmony, and formalizing voluntarism—intended to reconcile the country to the inequalities of urban-industrial life. Through the construction of corporate bureaucracies, the development of \"human engineering,\" and the creation of the nonprofit sector, members of the new middle class attempted, with considerable success, to get inequality \"right\" by adapting their traditional expectations about inequality to new institutional circumstances. By linking large-scale changes to the agency of a specific social group, Zunz's contributions to historical research illuminate how the American Century emerged from historical circumstances and why it has fallen apart.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"173 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise\",\"authors\":\"Keith D. Revell\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ttr.43.2.173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay draws on Zunz's major works to show how the reformulation of the American Promise between, roughly, 1870 and 1960 established a new relationship between inequality and solidarity. I argue that Zunz's analysis demonstrates that the emerging white-collar middle class responded to the crises of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries with three cultural innovations—recodifying status, engineering social harmony, and formalizing voluntarism—intended to reconcile the country to the inequalities of urban-industrial life. Through the construction of corporate bureaucracies, the development of \\\"human engineering,\\\" and the creation of the nonprofit sector, members of the new middle class attempted, with considerable success, to get inequality \\\"right\\\" by adapting their traditional expectations about inequality to new institutional circumstances. By linking large-scale changes to the agency of a specific social group, Zunz's contributions to historical research illuminate how the American Century emerged from historical circumstances and why it has fallen apart.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"173 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.43.2.173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.43.2.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文借鉴了Zunz的主要著作,展示了1870年至1960年间对美国承诺的重新表述如何在不平等与团结之间建立了一种新的关系。我认为,Zunz的分析表明,新兴的白领中产阶级对19世纪末和20世纪初的危机做出了三种文化创新的回应——重新确认地位、设计社会和谐和将唯意志主义正式化——旨在使国家与城市工业生活的不平等相协调。通过企业官僚机构的建设、“人类工程学”的发展和非营利部门的创建,新中产阶级成员试图通过调整他们对不平等的传统期望来“纠正”不平等,并取得了相当大的成功。通过将大规模变化与特定社会群体的代理联系起来,Zunz对历史研究的贡献阐明了美国世纪是如何从历史环境中出现的,以及它为什么会分崩离析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise
Abstract:This essay draws on Zunz's major works to show how the reformulation of the American Promise between, roughly, 1870 and 1960 established a new relationship between inequality and solidarity. I argue that Zunz's analysis demonstrates that the emerging white-collar middle class responded to the crises of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries with three cultural innovations—recodifying status, engineering social harmony, and formalizing voluntarism—intended to reconcile the country to the inequalities of urban-industrial life. Through the construction of corporate bureaucracies, the development of "human engineering," and the creation of the nonprofit sector, members of the new middle class attempted, with considerable success, to get inequality "right" by adapting their traditional expectations about inequality to new institutional circumstances. By linking large-scale changes to the agency of a specific social group, Zunz's contributions to historical research illuminate how the American Century emerged from historical circumstances and why it has fallen apart.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信