基于可信度概率的现场加工基准点双目测量精度评价

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Binchao YU , Wei LIU , Yanze ZHANG , Dazhi MA , Zhenyuan JIA , Yi YUE , Jiabo ZHANG
{"title":"基于可信度概率的现场加工基准点双目测量精度评价","authors":"Binchao YU ,&nbsp;Wei LIU ,&nbsp;Yanze ZHANG ,&nbsp;Dazhi MA ,&nbsp;Zhenyuan JIA ,&nbsp;Yi YUE ,&nbsp;Jiabo ZHANG","doi":"10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Passive binocular measurement systems are being increasingly utilized in the in-situ industries of automobiles, aviation, and aerospace, etc. due to their excellent qualities of accuracy, efficiency, and cost performance. Whereas the barrier of evaluating the accuracy of measured objects resulted from the unequal equivalent focal length and quantization of pixels, has limited their further development and application of high requirements for in-situ machining, e.g., the measurement of machining reference points for the positioning of robotic drilling in aerospace manufacturing. In this paper, an accuracy evaluation method is proposed to address the problem. Firstly, the unequal equivalent focal length is considered to improve the accuracy of 3D reconstruction. Next, the credibility probability model is developed to calculate the probability of the observed error in the public view of the binocular measurement system and indicates the direction of improvement. Finally, the in-situ experiment is carried out to validate the method within the effective public view range of 300 mm × 300 mm. The experiment results show that the RMSs of observed errors are superior to 0.035 mm, and the credibility probabilities are all higher than 0.91; the maximum 3D reconstruction accuracy improvement is 60.3%, with the error reduced from 0.078 mm to 0.031 mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55631,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Aeronautics","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 472-486"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100093612300122X/pdfft?md5=f30609fadc377f8995a4d7c073e778fa&pid=1-s2.0-S100093612300122X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy evaluation for in-situ machining reference points binocular measurement based on credibility probability\",\"authors\":\"Binchao YU ,&nbsp;Wei LIU ,&nbsp;Yanze ZHANG ,&nbsp;Dazhi MA ,&nbsp;Zhenyuan JIA ,&nbsp;Yi YUE ,&nbsp;Jiabo ZHANG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Passive binocular measurement systems are being increasingly utilized in the in-situ industries of automobiles, aviation, and aerospace, etc. due to their excellent qualities of accuracy, efficiency, and cost performance. Whereas the barrier of evaluating the accuracy of measured objects resulted from the unequal equivalent focal length and quantization of pixels, has limited their further development and application of high requirements for in-situ machining, e.g., the measurement of machining reference points for the positioning of robotic drilling in aerospace manufacturing. In this paper, an accuracy evaluation method is proposed to address the problem. Firstly, the unequal equivalent focal length is considered to improve the accuracy of 3D reconstruction. Next, the credibility probability model is developed to calculate the probability of the observed error in the public view of the binocular measurement system and indicates the direction of improvement. Finally, the in-situ experiment is carried out to validate the method within the effective public view range of 300 mm × 300 mm. The experiment results show that the RMSs of observed errors are superior to 0.035 mm, and the credibility probabilities are all higher than 0.91; the maximum 3D reconstruction accuracy improvement is 60.3%, with the error reduced from 0.078 mm to 0.031 mm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Aeronautics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 472-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100093612300122X/pdfft?md5=f30609fadc377f8995a4d7c073e778fa&pid=1-s2.0-S100093612300122X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Aeronautics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100093612300122X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Aeronautics","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100093612300122X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无源双目测量系统因其卓越的精度、效率和性价比,越来越多地应用于汽车、航空和航天等现场工业。然而,由于等效焦距不等和像素量化导致的被测物精度评估障碍,限制了其进一步发展和应用于对现场加工要求较高的领域,如航空航天制造中机器人钻孔定位的加工参考点测量。本文针对这一问题提出了一种精度评估方法。首先,考虑了不等效焦距以提高三维重建的精度。其次,建立可信度概率模型,计算双目测量系统公共视图中观测到的误差概率,并指出改进方向。最后,在 300 mm × 300 mm 的有效公共视角范围内进行了现场实验,以验证该方法的有效性。实验结果表明,观测误差均方根优于 0.035 毫米,可信概率均大于 0.91;三维重建精度最大提高了 60.3%,误差从 0.078 毫米降低到 0.031 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy evaluation for in-situ machining reference points binocular measurement based on credibility probability

Passive binocular measurement systems are being increasingly utilized in the in-situ industries of automobiles, aviation, and aerospace, etc. due to their excellent qualities of accuracy, efficiency, and cost performance. Whereas the barrier of evaluating the accuracy of measured objects resulted from the unequal equivalent focal length and quantization of pixels, has limited their further development and application of high requirements for in-situ machining, e.g., the measurement of machining reference points for the positioning of robotic drilling in aerospace manufacturing. In this paper, an accuracy evaluation method is proposed to address the problem. Firstly, the unequal equivalent focal length is considered to improve the accuracy of 3D reconstruction. Next, the credibility probability model is developed to calculate the probability of the observed error in the public view of the binocular measurement system and indicates the direction of improvement. Finally, the in-situ experiment is carried out to validate the method within the effective public view range of 300 mm × 300 mm. The experiment results show that the RMSs of observed errors are superior to 0.035 mm, and the credibility probabilities are all higher than 0.91; the maximum 3D reconstruction accuracy improvement is 60.3%, with the error reduced from 0.078 mm to 0.031 mm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
17.50%
发文量
3080
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Aeronautics (CJA) is an open access, peer-reviewed international journal covering all aspects of aerospace engineering. The Journal reports the scientific and technological achievements and frontiers in aeronautic engineering and astronautic engineering, in both theory and practice, such as theoretical research articles, experiment ones, research notes, comprehensive reviews, technological briefs and other reports on the latest developments and everything related to the fields of aeronautics and astronautics, as well as those ground equipment concerned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信