以知识为基础的模型创建为补充的IMRT规划目标多准则优化

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katrin Teichert , Garry Currie , Karl-Heinz Küfer , Eliane Miguel-Chumacero , Philipp Süss , Michał Walczak , Suzanne Currie
{"title":"以知识为基础的模型创建为补充的IMRT规划目标多准则优化","authors":"Katrin Teichert ,&nbsp;Garry Currie ,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Küfer ,&nbsp;Eliane Miguel-Chumacero ,&nbsp;Philipp Süss ,&nbsp;Michał Walczak ,&nbsp;Suzanne Currie","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2019.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is an inherently multi-criteria task. A multi-criteria workflow (MCW) typically passes the following steps: create an optimisation model with multiple criteria, approximate the Pareto frontier, and visualise the generated plans to the decision-maker (DM) for inspection. This interactive plan selection and manipulation allow to create better treatment plans as judged by physicians. However, once an optimisation model is specified, optimisation objectives cannot be modified any more. Thus this fixed model implies that a planner has to guess an appropriate model to begin with. Only after Pareto frontier approximation is calculated, the planner can assess the goodness of the model by exploring the trade-offs. The shortcoming of a MCW becomes apparent when the proposed model fails to generate expected trade-offs and the planner is thus forced to refine the model and repeat the calculations. To circumvent this drawback in the MCW, we propose a local multi-criteria workflow (L-MCW) designed and implemented in a collaboration between Fraunhofer ITWM and Varian Medical Systems. L-MCW enables local exploration around an initial, promising plan. The initial plan is automatically inferred by a knowledge-based algorithm (RapidPlan™). The decision-maker can thus evaluate trade-offs in the most interesting region surrounding the initial plan. Clinical results of the combination of knowledge-based planning and L-MCW with a cohort of Prostate and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) Lung cases demonstrate substantially reduced planning time and improved organ-at-risk sparing compared to manual planning. The L-MCW provides an intuitive and flexible mechanism to adapt knowledge-based-planning models to similar, but not identical clinical situations and allows the practitioner to quickly determine and realise the most beneficial trade-offs in a treatment plan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2019.04.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted multi-criteria optimisation in IMRT planning supplemented by knowledge based model creation\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Teichert ,&nbsp;Garry Currie ,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Küfer ,&nbsp;Eliane Miguel-Chumacero ,&nbsp;Philipp Süss ,&nbsp;Michał Walczak ,&nbsp;Suzanne Currie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orhc.2019.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is an inherently multi-criteria task. A multi-criteria workflow (MCW) typically passes the following steps: create an optimisation model with multiple criteria, approximate the Pareto frontier, and visualise the generated plans to the decision-maker (DM) for inspection. This interactive plan selection and manipulation allow to create better treatment plans as judged by physicians. However, once an optimisation model is specified, optimisation objectives cannot be modified any more. Thus this fixed model implies that a planner has to guess an appropriate model to begin with. Only after Pareto frontier approximation is calculated, the planner can assess the goodness of the model by exploring the trade-offs. The shortcoming of a MCW becomes apparent when the proposed model fails to generate expected trade-offs and the planner is thus forced to refine the model and repeat the calculations. To circumvent this drawback in the MCW, we propose a local multi-criteria workflow (L-MCW) designed and implemented in a collaboration between Fraunhofer ITWM and Varian Medical Systems. L-MCW enables local exploration around an initial, promising plan. The initial plan is automatically inferred by a knowledge-based algorithm (RapidPlan™). The decision-maker can thus evaluate trade-offs in the most interesting region surrounding the initial plan. Clinical results of the combination of knowledge-based planning and L-MCW with a cohort of Prostate and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) Lung cases demonstrate substantially reduced planning time and improved organ-at-risk sparing compared to manual planning. The L-MCW provides an intuitive and flexible mechanism to adapt knowledge-based-planning models to similar, but not identical clinical situations and allows the practitioner to quickly determine and realise the most beneficial trade-offs in a treatment plan.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2019.04.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692317301844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692317301844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划是一个本质上多标准的任务。多标准工作流(MCW)通常通过以下步骤:创建具有多个标准的优化模型,近似帕累托边界,并将生成的计划可视化,以供决策者(DM)检查。这种相互作用的方案选择和操作允许医生根据判断制定更好的治疗方案。然而,一旦指定了优化模型,优化目标就不能再修改了。因此,这个固定的模型意味着计划者必须从一个合适的模型开始。只有计算出Pareto边界近似后,规划者才能通过权衡来评估模型的优劣。当提出的模型不能产生预期的权衡时,MCW的缺点就变得明显了,因此计划者被迫改进模型并重复计算。为了规避MCW中的这一缺陷,我们提出了一个由弗劳恩霍夫ITWM和瓦里安医疗系统合作设计和实现的本地多标准工作流(L-MCW)。L-MCW可以围绕最初的、有希望的计划进行本地勘探。初始计划由基于知识的算法(RapidPlan™)自动推断。因此,决策者可以在围绕初始计划的最有趣的区域中评估权衡。结合基于知识的计划和L-MCW与前列腺和立体定向消融放疗(SABR)肺病例队列的临床结果表明,与手动计划相比,计划时间大大缩短,并改善了器官风险保护。L-MCW提供了一种直观和灵活的机制,使基于知识的计划模型适应相似但不相同的临床情况,并允许从业者快速确定和实现治疗计划中最有益的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeted multi-criteria optimisation in IMRT planning supplemented by knowledge based model creation

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning is an inherently multi-criteria task. A multi-criteria workflow (MCW) typically passes the following steps: create an optimisation model with multiple criteria, approximate the Pareto frontier, and visualise the generated plans to the decision-maker (DM) for inspection. This interactive plan selection and manipulation allow to create better treatment plans as judged by physicians. However, once an optimisation model is specified, optimisation objectives cannot be modified any more. Thus this fixed model implies that a planner has to guess an appropriate model to begin with. Only after Pareto frontier approximation is calculated, the planner can assess the goodness of the model by exploring the trade-offs. The shortcoming of a MCW becomes apparent when the proposed model fails to generate expected trade-offs and the planner is thus forced to refine the model and repeat the calculations. To circumvent this drawback in the MCW, we propose a local multi-criteria workflow (L-MCW) designed and implemented in a collaboration between Fraunhofer ITWM and Varian Medical Systems. L-MCW enables local exploration around an initial, promising plan. The initial plan is automatically inferred by a knowledge-based algorithm (RapidPlan™). The decision-maker can thus evaluate trade-offs in the most interesting region surrounding the initial plan. Clinical results of the combination of knowledge-based planning and L-MCW with a cohort of Prostate and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) Lung cases demonstrate substantially reduced planning time and improved organ-at-risk sparing compared to manual planning. The L-MCW provides an intuitive and flexible mechanism to adapt knowledge-based-planning models to similar, but not identical clinical situations and allows the practitioner to quickly determine and realise the most beneficial trade-offs in a treatment plan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信