伊朗海卡尼亚森林的多溪流框架和采伐政策变化

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
B. Sotoudeh Foumani, M. Kolahi, S. Mohammadi Limaei, J. Fisher, T. Rostami Shahraji
{"title":"伊朗海卡尼亚森林的多溪流框架和采伐政策变化","authors":"B. Sotoudeh Foumani, M. Kolahi, S. Mohammadi Limaei, J. Fisher, T. Rostami Shahraji","doi":"10.1080/00049158.2021.1989848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2017 logging ban in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests represents a considerable forest policy change, which was proposed following the development of other major policies to improve natural resource management. The aim of this paper is to explain the development of the logging ban policy using Kingdon’s multiple streams framework (MSF). Qualitative methods – interviewing and document review – were used for data collection and analysis. The problem, politics and policy streams are shown to be linked in framing the policy change. We investigate how participants in the development of the policy used interlinkages between the problem, politics and policy streams to develop their proposals and how this simplified the change process. Despite some limitations, the MSF is helpful in explaining and analysing outcomes of natural resource management policy development processes. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 18 December 2020 Accepted 15 September 2021","PeriodicalId":55426,"journal":{"name":"Australian Forestry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple streams framework and logging policy change in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran\",\"authors\":\"B. Sotoudeh Foumani, M. Kolahi, S. Mohammadi Limaei, J. Fisher, T. Rostami Shahraji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049158.2021.1989848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2017 logging ban in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests represents a considerable forest policy change, which was proposed following the development of other major policies to improve natural resource management. The aim of this paper is to explain the development of the logging ban policy using Kingdon’s multiple streams framework (MSF). Qualitative methods – interviewing and document review – were used for data collection and analysis. The problem, politics and policy streams are shown to be linked in framing the policy change. We investigate how participants in the development of the policy used interlinkages between the problem, politics and policy streams to develop their proposals and how this simplified the change process. Despite some limitations, the MSF is helpful in explaining and analysing outcomes of natural resource management policy development processes. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 18 December 2020 Accepted 15 September 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":55426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2021.1989848\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2021.1989848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2017年伊朗赫卡尼亚森林的采伐禁令代表了一项重大的森林政策变化,这是在制定其他改善自然资源管理的主要政策之后提出的。本文的目的是解释使用Kingdon的多流框架(MSF)的伐木禁令政策的发展。定性方法-访谈和文献回顾-用于数据收集和分析。问题、政治和政策流在制定政策变化时相互联系。我们调查政策制定的参与者如何利用问题、政治和政策流之间的相互联系来制定他们的建议,以及这如何简化了变化过程。尽管有一些限制,无国界医生组织在解释和分析自然资源管理政策制定过程的结果方面是有帮助的。文章接收日期2020年12月18日接收日期2021年9月15日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple streams framework and logging policy change in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran
The 2017 logging ban in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests represents a considerable forest policy change, which was proposed following the development of other major policies to improve natural resource management. The aim of this paper is to explain the development of the logging ban policy using Kingdon’s multiple streams framework (MSF). Qualitative methods – interviewing and document review – were used for data collection and analysis. The problem, politics and policy streams are shown to be linked in framing the policy change. We investigate how participants in the development of the policy used interlinkages between the problem, politics and policy streams to develop their proposals and how this simplified the change process. Despite some limitations, the MSF is helpful in explaining and analysing outcomes of natural resource management policy development processes. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 18 December 2020 Accepted 15 September 2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Forestry is published by Taylor & Francis for the Institute of Foresters of Australia (IFA) for scientific, technical, and professional communication relating to forestry in the Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信