对商学院学生图书馆有效教学的系统评价

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Céline Gareau-Brennan, J. Kung
{"title":"对商学院学生图书馆有效教学的系统评价","authors":"Céline Gareau-Brennan, J. Kung","doi":"10.1080/08963568.2021.2015849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The most successful library teaching strategies for post-secondary business programs have yet to be determined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of library instruction (with a focus on pedagogy) in business undergraduate and graduate programs. The researchers searched seven databases, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. To achieve the study’s primary objective, the researchers included any library educational intervention in a business program conducted by librarians or library staff. The quality of included studies was evaluated based on a modified instrument designed to critically appraise educational interventions. The instrument consists of nine questions that relate to content, context, outcomes, study design, and methods. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and data was extracted based on subject area, content coverage, mode of instruction (in-person vs virtual), faculty collaboration, assessment strategies, and library educational interventions used to teach business students. Common educational interventions included hands-on activities, live demonstrations, active learning, group work, and lectures. The most compelling strategies include active learning, providing engaging sessions (e.g., flipped classroom), and faculty collaboration. Since most of the studies did not state clear learning outcomes, it is difficult to ascertain what type of interventions were truly effective in improving library sessions.","PeriodicalId":44062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship","volume":"27 1","pages":"81 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Effective Library Instruction for Business Students\",\"authors\":\"Céline Gareau-Brennan, J. Kung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08963568.2021.2015849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The most successful library teaching strategies for post-secondary business programs have yet to be determined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of library instruction (with a focus on pedagogy) in business undergraduate and graduate programs. The researchers searched seven databases, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. To achieve the study’s primary objective, the researchers included any library educational intervention in a business program conducted by librarians or library staff. The quality of included studies was evaluated based on a modified instrument designed to critically appraise educational interventions. The instrument consists of nine questions that relate to content, context, outcomes, study design, and methods. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and data was extracted based on subject area, content coverage, mode of instruction (in-person vs virtual), faculty collaboration, assessment strategies, and library educational interventions used to teach business students. Common educational interventions included hands-on activities, live demonstrations, active learning, group work, and lectures. The most compelling strategies include active learning, providing engaging sessions (e.g., flipped classroom), and faculty collaboration. Since most of the studies did not state clear learning outcomes, it is difficult to ascertain what type of interventions were truly effective in improving library sessions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2021.2015849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2021.2015849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要中学后商业课程中最成功的图书馆教学策略尚未确定。本系统综述的目的是调查图书馆教学(重点是教育学)在商科本科生和研究生课程中的有效性。研究人员搜索了七个数据库,选择了符合纳入标准的研究,并根据PRISMA指南提取了数据。为了实现这项研究的主要目标,研究人员将任何图书馆教育干预纳入了图书馆员或图书馆工作人员实施的商业计划中。纳入研究的质量是根据一种旨在批判性评估教育干预措施的改良工具进行评估的。该工具由九个问题组成,涉及内容、背景、结果、研究设计和方法。35项研究符合纳入标准,数据是根据学科领域、内容覆盖率、教学模式(面对面与虚拟)、教师合作、评估策略和用于教授商科学生的图书馆教育干预措施提取的。常见的教育干预措施包括动手活动、现场演示、积极学习、小组工作和讲座。最引人注目的策略包括积极学习、提供引人入胜的课程(如翻转课堂)和教师合作。由于大多数研究都没有说明明确的学习结果,因此很难确定哪种类型的干预措施在改善图书馆课程方面真正有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Effective Library Instruction for Business Students
Abstract The most successful library teaching strategies for post-secondary business programs have yet to be determined. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of library instruction (with a focus on pedagogy) in business undergraduate and graduate programs. The researchers searched seven databases, selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. To achieve the study’s primary objective, the researchers included any library educational intervention in a business program conducted by librarians or library staff. The quality of included studies was evaluated based on a modified instrument designed to critically appraise educational interventions. The instrument consists of nine questions that relate to content, context, outcomes, study design, and methods. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and data was extracted based on subject area, content coverage, mode of instruction (in-person vs virtual), faculty collaboration, assessment strategies, and library educational interventions used to teach business students. Common educational interventions included hands-on activities, live demonstrations, active learning, group work, and lectures. The most compelling strategies include active learning, providing engaging sessions (e.g., flipped classroom), and faculty collaboration. Since most of the studies did not state clear learning outcomes, it is difficult to ascertain what type of interventions were truly effective in improving library sessions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship is an innovative quarterly journal that provides you with useful articles about the creation, organization, dissemination, retrieval, and use of business information. This refereed journal covers the business information needs of special libraries, academic libraries, and public libraries, as well as information services and centers outside of the traditional library setting. You"ll find that the journal is international in scope, reflecting the multinational and international scope of the business community today. The immediate focus of the journal is practice-oriented articles, but it also provides an outlet for new empirical studies on business librarianship and business information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信