有争议的路径

IF 0.9 Q2 LINGUISTICS

Metaphor and the Social World Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1075/msw.20004.ric

P. Richardson, Charles M. Mueller

{"title":"有争议的路径","authors":"P. Richardson, Charles M. Mueller","doi":"10.1075/msw.20004.ric","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent studies of metaphor usage (e.g., Cameron, 2011; Semino et al., 2013) have shifted focus from relatively static mappings between source\n and target domains towards an emphasis on how metaphors are appropriated and recontextualized across different genres to convey\n new meanings and serve new functions. More recently, this emphasis has begun to be applied to the study of metaphor usage in\n religious discourse (Pihlaja, 2014; Richardson,\n 2017; Richardson et al., 2021). The current article investigates how\n metaphors of movement are used in conjunction with metonymy, force dynamics, and conceptual blending to create particular\n rhetorical effects in a debate between the atheist Richard Dawkins and the Christian apologist John Lennox. It demonstrates how\n previous figurative language is expanded and reconfigured during the course of the debate in an attempt to establish situated,\n dominant conceptualizations.","PeriodicalId":51936,"journal":{"name":"Metaphor and the Social World","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested paths\",\"authors\":\"P. Richardson, Charles M. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/msw.20004.ric\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Recent studies of metaphor usage (e.g., Cameron, 2011; Semino et al., 2013) have shifted focus from relatively static mappings between source\\n and target domains towards an emphasis on how metaphors are appropriated and recontextualized across different genres to convey\\n new meanings and serve new functions. More recently, this emphasis has begun to be applied to the study of metaphor usage in\\n religious discourse (Pihlaja, 2014; Richardson,\\n 2017; Richardson et al., 2021). The current article investigates how\\n metaphors of movement are used in conjunction with metonymy, force dynamics, and conceptual blending to create particular\\n rhetorical effects in a debate between the atheist Richard Dawkins and the Christian apologist John Lennox. It demonstrates how\\n previous figurative language is expanded and reconfigured during the course of the debate in an attempt to establish situated,\\n dominant conceptualizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metaphor and the Social World\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metaphor and the Social World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20004.ric\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphor and the Social World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20004.ric","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对隐喻用法的研究（例如，Cameron，2011；Semino等人，2013）已经将重点从源域和目标域之间相对静态的映射转移到强调隐喻如何在不同类型中被挪用和重新文本化，以传达新的含义和服务新的功能。最近，这种强调已经开始应用于宗教话语中隐喻用法的研究（Pihlaja，2014；理查森，2017；理查森等人，2021）。本文探讨了在无神论者理查德·道金斯和基督教辩护者约翰·伦诺克斯之间的辩论中，运动隐喻如何与转喻、力量动力学和概念融合结合使用，以产生特定的修辞效果。它展示了在辩论过程中，先前的比喻语言是如何被扩展和重新配置的，试图建立情境化的、占主导地位的概念化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Contested paths

Recent studies of metaphor usage (e.g., Cameron, 2011; Semino et al., 2013) have shifted focus from relatively static mappings between source and target domains towards an emphasis on how metaphors are appropriated and recontextualized across different genres to convey new meanings and serve new functions. More recently, this emphasis has begun to be applied to the study of metaphor usage in religious discourse (Pihlaja, 2014; Richardson, 2017; Richardson et al., 2021). The current article investigates how metaphors of movement are used in conjunction with metonymy, force dynamics, and conceptual blending to create particular rhetorical effects in a debate between the atheist Richard Dawkins and the Christian apologist John Lennox. It demonstrates how previous figurative language is expanded and reconfigured during the course of the debate in an attempt to establish situated, dominant conceptualizations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Metaphor and the Social World LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal Metaphor and the Social World aims to provide a forum for researchers to share with each other, and with potential research users, work that explores aspects of metaphor and the social world. The term “social world” signals the importance given to context (of metaphor use), to connections (e.g. across social, cognitive and discourse dimensions of metaphor use), and to communication (between individuals or across social groups). The journal is not restricted to a single disciplinary or theoretical framework but welcomes papers based in a range of theoretical approaches to metaphor, including discourse and cognitive linguistic approaches, provided that the theory adequately supports the empirical work. Metaphor may be dealt with as either a matter of language or of thought, or of both; what matters is that consideration is given to the social and discourse contexts in which metaphor is found. Furthermore, “metaphor” is broadly interpreted and articles are welcomed on metonymy and other types of figurative language. A further aim is to encourage the development of high-quality research methodology using metaphor as an investigative tool, and for investigating the nature of metaphor use, for example multi-modal discourse analytic or corpus linguistic approaches to metaphor data. The journal publishes various types of articles, including reports of empirical studies, key articles accompanied by short responses, reviews and meta-analyses with commentaries. The Forum section publishes short responses to papers or current issues.