在线用户信息验证对同行健康虚假信息纠正效果的影响：一个自然的准实验

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Communication Reports Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412

Chen-Ting Chang, Lyn M. van Swol

{"title":"在线用户信息验证对同行健康虚假信息纠正效果的影响：一个自然的准实验","authors":"Chen-Ting Chang, Lyn M. van Swol","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the influence of user fact-checking and people’s trust in misinformation on the effectiveness of misinformation correction provided by a peer. A lab quasi-experiment was conducted. Participants received misinformation about weight loss methods and were given autonomy to decide whether to seek additional information online, followed by a subsequent misinformation correction. Information verification and trust in misinformation were positively related to resistance to correction, even when people’s predisposition towards effortful thinking and gender were included in the model. People who tried to verify the information and trusted the misinformation were not more likely to resist misinformation correction than those who did not fact-check and trusted the misinformation. Further, intention to share was positively associated with levels of trust in misinformation.","PeriodicalId":45913,"journal":{"name":"Communication Reports","volume":"36 1","pages":"162 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Online User Information Verification on the Effect of Health Misinformation Correction Provided by a Peer: A Natural Quasi-Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Ting Chang, Lyn M. van Swol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the influence of user fact-checking and people’s trust in misinformation on the effectiveness of misinformation correction provided by a peer. A lab quasi-experiment was conducted. Participants received misinformation about weight loss methods and were given autonomy to decide whether to seek additional information online, followed by a subsequent misinformation correction. Information verification and trust in misinformation were positively related to resistance to correction, even when people’s predisposition towards effortful thinking and gender were included in the model. People who tried to verify the information and trusted the misinformation were not more likely to resist misinformation correction than those who did not fact-check and trusted the misinformation. Further, intention to share was positively associated with levels of trust in misinformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Reports\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2023.2232412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察了用户事实核查和人们对错误信息的信任对同行提供的错误信息纠正有效性的影响。进行了实验室准实验。参与者收到了关于减肥方法的错误信息，并有权自主决定是否在网上寻求更多信息，随后进行错误信息更正。信息验证和对错误信息的信任与抵制纠正呈正相关，即使模型中包括了人们努力思考的倾向和性别。那些试图核实信息并信任错误信息的人并不比那些不进行事实核查并信任错误消息的人更有可能抵制错误信息更正。此外，分享意愿与对错误信息的信任程度呈正相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Influence of Online User Information Verification on the Effect of Health Misinformation Correction Provided by a Peer: A Natural Quasi-Experiment

This study examined the influence of user fact-checking and people’s trust in misinformation on the effectiveness of misinformation correction provided by a peer. A lab quasi-experiment was conducted. Participants received misinformation about weight loss methods and were given autonomy to decide whether to seek additional information online, followed by a subsequent misinformation correction. Information verification and trust in misinformation were positively related to resistance to correction, even when people’s predisposition towards effortful thinking and gender were included in the model. People who tried to verify the information and trusted the misinformation were not more likely to resist misinformation correction than those who did not fact-check and trusted the misinformation. Further, intention to share was positively associated with levels of trust in misinformation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communication Reports COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Communication Reports (CR), published biannually since 1988, is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal publishes original manuscripts that are short, data/text-based, and related to the broadly defined field of human communication. The mission of the journal is to showcase exemplary scholarship without censorship based on topics, methods, or analytical tools. Articles that are purely speculative or theoretical, and not data analytic, are not appropriate for this journal. Authors are expected to devote a substantial portion of the manuscript to analyzing and reporting research data.