不同土壤类型对旱地土壤肥力的影响

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Quoc Thinh Tran, Kiwako S. Araki, Motoki Kubo
{"title":"不同土壤类型对旱地土壤肥力的影响","authors":"Quoc Thinh Tran,&nbsp;Kiwako S. Araki,&nbsp;Motoki Kubo","doi":"10.1016/j.aoas.2021.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil type is a vital determinant of soil fertility because of its characteristic biological, chemical, and physical properties. However, the soil fertility of upland soil is probably changed by different agricultural management practices regardless of soil type. This study investigated the features of soil fertility (bacterial biomass, total carbon (TC), and total nitrogen (TN)) in upland fields in Japan. One thousand soil samples from different soil types were collected from upland fields located on 36 prefectures in Japan. The soil fertility was analyzed using the Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX). There were six soil types included in this study: Organic soils (B), Andosols (D), Lowland soils (F), Red-yellow soils (G), Stagnic soils (H), and Brown Forest soils (I). Of these, the soil types D and F occupied the largest percentage of samples. The values of bacterial biomass, TC, and TN varied greatly, regardless of soil type. The soil fertility does not seem to be characterized by the soil type in upland soils in Japan. The correlations between bacterial biomass and TC (<em>r</em> = 0.23, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and bacterial biomass and TN (<em>r</em> = 0.16, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) were relatively weak. Conversely, the correlation between TC and TN (<em>r</em> = 0.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) was moderate. In soil type D, up to 40% of samples had no bacterial biomass detected and 17% possessed a low bacterial biomass. The effect of the soil types may not be a critical factor in soil fertility in the upland fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54198,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural Science","volume":"66 2","pages":"Pages 101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.07.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of upland soil fertility from different soil types\",\"authors\":\"Quoc Thinh Tran,&nbsp;Kiwako S. Araki,&nbsp;Motoki Kubo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aoas.2021.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil type is a vital determinant of soil fertility because of its characteristic biological, chemical, and physical properties. However, the soil fertility of upland soil is probably changed by different agricultural management practices regardless of soil type. This study investigated the features of soil fertility (bacterial biomass, total carbon (TC), and total nitrogen (TN)) in upland fields in Japan. One thousand soil samples from different soil types were collected from upland fields located on 36 prefectures in Japan. The soil fertility was analyzed using the Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX). There were six soil types included in this study: Organic soils (B), Andosols (D), Lowland soils (F), Red-yellow soils (G), Stagnic soils (H), and Brown Forest soils (I). Of these, the soil types D and F occupied the largest percentage of samples. The values of bacterial biomass, TC, and TN varied greatly, regardless of soil type. The soil fertility does not seem to be characterized by the soil type in upland soils in Japan. The correlations between bacterial biomass and TC (<em>r</em> = 0.23, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and bacterial biomass and TN (<em>r</em> = 0.16, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) were relatively weak. Conversely, the correlation between TC and TN (<em>r</em> = 0.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) was moderate. In soil type D, up to 40% of samples had no bacterial biomass detected and 17% possessed a low bacterial biomass. The effect of the soil types may not be a critical factor in soil fertility in the upland fields.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Agricultural Science\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Agricultural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178321000324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178321000324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土壤类型由于其特有的生物、化学和物理性质,是土壤肥力的重要决定因素。然而,无论土壤类型如何,不同的农业管理措施都可能改变旱地土壤的肥力。研究了日本旱地土壤肥力(细菌生物量、总碳(TC)和总氮(TN))特征。从日本36个县的旱地采集了1000个不同土壤类型的土壤样本。采用土壤肥力指数(SOFIX)对土壤肥力进行分析。本研究共包括有机土(B)、安土(D)、低地土(F)、红黄土(G)、停滞土(H)和棕林土(I) 6种土壤类型,其中D和F类型占样品比例最大。不同土壤类型的细菌生物量、总氮和总碳含量差异较大。日本旱地土壤的肥力似乎不以土壤类型为特征。细菌生物量与TC的相关性(r = 0.23, p <0.01)、细菌生物量和TN (r = 0.16, p <0.01)相对较弱。反之,TC与TN的相关性(r = 0.68, p <0.01)为中度。在D型土壤中,高达40%的样品未检测到细菌生物量,17%的样品具有低细菌生物量。土壤类型的影响可能不是旱地土壤肥力的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of upland soil fertility from different soil types

Soil type is a vital determinant of soil fertility because of its characteristic biological, chemical, and physical properties. However, the soil fertility of upland soil is probably changed by different agricultural management practices regardless of soil type. This study investigated the features of soil fertility (bacterial biomass, total carbon (TC), and total nitrogen (TN)) in upland fields in Japan. One thousand soil samples from different soil types were collected from upland fields located on 36 prefectures in Japan. The soil fertility was analyzed using the Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX). There were six soil types included in this study: Organic soils (B), Andosols (D), Lowland soils (F), Red-yellow soils (G), Stagnic soils (H), and Brown Forest soils (I). Of these, the soil types D and F occupied the largest percentage of samples. The values of bacterial biomass, TC, and TN varied greatly, regardless of soil type. The soil fertility does not seem to be characterized by the soil type in upland soils in Japan. The correlations between bacterial biomass and TC (r = 0.23, p < 0.01) and bacterial biomass and TN (r = 0.16, p < 0.01) were relatively weak. Conversely, the correlation between TC and TN (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) was moderate. In soil type D, up to 40% of samples had no bacterial biomass detected and 17% possessed a low bacterial biomass. The effect of the soil types may not be a critical factor in soil fertility in the upland fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural Science
Annals of Agricultural Science AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Agricultural Sciences (AOAS) is the official journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University. AOAS is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles and review articles on experimental and modelling research at laboratory, field, farm, landscape, and industrial levels. AOAS aims to maximize the quality of the agricultural sector across the globe with emphasis on the Arabian countries by focusing on publishing the high-quality applicable researches, in addition to the new methods and frontiers leading to maximizing the quality and quantity of both plant and animal yield and final products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信