{"title":"荷马复活的?重新思考恩尼乌斯编年史中灵魂的轮回","authors":"Patrick Glauthier","doi":"10.1353/are.2021.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper reconsiders certain assumptions about Ennius's dream in the Annals. I argue that Ennius likely characterized transmigration as Pythagorean; that based on comparisons with Pythagorean texts, Ennius, not Homer, probably said \"memini me fiere pavom\" (frag. 1.9 .11); that Ennius may have remembered being Homer in a previous life rather than presenting himself as Homer reincarnate; and that Ennius may have claimed to possess not \"Homer's soul\" but \"the soul that used to belong to Homer.\" At multiple points, I make innovative use of an epigram ascribed to Antipater (AP 7.75) that most critics consider relevant to the dream.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homer Redivivus? Rethinking the Transmigration of the Soul in Ennius's Annals\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Glauthier\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2021.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper reconsiders certain assumptions about Ennius's dream in the Annals. I argue that Ennius likely characterized transmigration as Pythagorean; that based on comparisons with Pythagorean texts, Ennius, not Homer, probably said \\\"memini me fiere pavom\\\" (frag. 1.9 .11); that Ennius may have remembered being Homer in a previous life rather than presenting himself as Homer reincarnate; and that Ennius may have claimed to possess not \\\"Homer's soul\\\" but \\\"the soul that used to belong to Homer.\\\" At multiple points, I make innovative use of an epigram ascribed to Antipater (AP 7.75) that most critics consider relevant to the dream.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2021.0006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2021.0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要:本文重新审视了《纪事》中关于恩尼厄斯梦的某些假设。我认为恩尼乌斯很可能将轮回描述为毕达哥拉斯式的;基于与毕达哥拉斯的文本的比较,恩尼乌斯,而不是荷马,可能说“memini me fiere pavom”。1.9厚);恩尼厄斯可能记得自己前世是荷马,而不是荷马的转世;恩尼厄斯可能声称自己拥有的不是“荷马的灵魂”,而是“曾经属于荷马的灵魂”。在很多地方,我创新地使用了安提帕特(AP 7.75)的警句,大多数评论家认为这与梦有关。
Homer Redivivus? Rethinking the Transmigration of the Soul in Ennius's Annals
Abstract:This paper reconsiders certain assumptions about Ennius's dream in the Annals. I argue that Ennius likely characterized transmigration as Pythagorean; that based on comparisons with Pythagorean texts, Ennius, not Homer, probably said "memini me fiere pavom" (frag. 1.9 .11); that Ennius may have remembered being Homer in a previous life rather than presenting himself as Homer reincarnate; and that Ennius may have claimed to possess not "Homer's soul" but "the soul that used to belong to Homer." At multiple points, I make innovative use of an epigram ascribed to Antipater (AP 7.75) that most critics consider relevant to the dream.
期刊介绍:
Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.