一种新的铁损分离方法

Q3 Engineering
Filomena B. R. Mendes, Fredy M. S. Suárez, N. Batistela, J. Leite, N. Sadowski, J. Bastos
{"title":"一种新的铁损分离方法","authors":"Filomena B. R. Mendes, Fredy M. S. Suárez, N. Batistela, J. Leite, N. Sadowski, J. Bastos","doi":"10.1590/2179-10742021v20i4254770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this work we propose a new method to separate iron losses by removing low frequency tests and reducing the number of experiments. The article deals with methodologies that use numerical methods to find the mathematical model coefficients of magnetic loss separation in hysteresis loss (Wh), eddy current loss (Wed) and excess loss (Wex). Three methodologies are presented and depend on experimental tests such as (i) varying magnetic induction Bm and constant supply frequency (f) of 50 Hz, (ii) constant magnetic induction around 1 T and varying frequency. The first methodology is based on Newton’s method to solve the numerical system generated with experimental data from two laboratory experiments. These data were reported in past references. Another two methodologies are based on genetic algorithms (GA). One of them depends on experimental data from both experiments and the another depends on experimental data only from experiment (i). Results indicate that genetic algorithms method presents excellent solutions in comparison with other ones. The GA method with two tests allows a better representation of the experimental behavior of the sample with maximum errors varying from 1.10% to 0.20%. In GA method with one test, minimization varied from 6.924 × 10−05 to 3.186 × 10−05.","PeriodicalId":53567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Method for Iron Loss Separation\",\"authors\":\"Filomena B. R. Mendes, Fredy M. S. Suárez, N. Batistela, J. Leite, N. Sadowski, J. Bastos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2179-10742021v20i4254770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this work we propose a new method to separate iron losses by removing low frequency tests and reducing the number of experiments. The article deals with methodologies that use numerical methods to find the mathematical model coefficients of magnetic loss separation in hysteresis loss (Wh), eddy current loss (Wed) and excess loss (Wex). Three methodologies are presented and depend on experimental tests such as (i) varying magnetic induction Bm and constant supply frequency (f) of 50 Hz, (ii) constant magnetic induction around 1 T and varying frequency. The first methodology is based on Newton’s method to solve the numerical system generated with experimental data from two laboratory experiments. These data were reported in past references. Another two methodologies are based on genetic algorithms (GA). One of them depends on experimental data from both experiments and the another depends on experimental data only from experiment (i). Results indicate that genetic algorithms method presents excellent solutions in comparison with other ones. The GA method with two tests allows a better representation of the experimental behavior of the sample with maximum errors varying from 1.10% to 0.20%. In GA method with one test, minimization varied from 6.924 × 10−05 to 3.186 × 10−05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-10742021v20i4254770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-10742021v20i4254770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这项工作中,我们提出了一种通过取消低频测试和减少实验次数来分离铁损失的新方法。本文介绍了用数值方法求磁滞损耗(Wh)、涡流损耗(Wed)和过损耗(Wex)中磁损耗分离的数学模型系数的方法。提出了三种方法,并依赖于实验测试,如(i)变化的磁感应Bm和50Hz的恒定供电频率(f),(ii)在1T左右的恒定磁感应和变化的频率。第一种方法是基于牛顿方法来求解由两个实验室实验的实验数据生成的数值系统。这些数据在过去的参考文献中有报道。另外两种方法是基于遗传算法的。其中一个依赖于两个实验的实验数据,另一个仅依赖于实验(i)的实验数据。结果表明,与其他方法相比,遗传算法方法具有很好的求解效果。具有两个测试的GA方法可以更好地表示样本的实验行为,最大误差从1.10%到0.20%不等。在具有一个测试的遗传算法方法中,最小值从6.924×10−05到3.186×10−05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Method for Iron Loss Separation
Abstract In this work we propose a new method to separate iron losses by removing low frequency tests and reducing the number of experiments. The article deals with methodologies that use numerical methods to find the mathematical model coefficients of magnetic loss separation in hysteresis loss (Wh), eddy current loss (Wed) and excess loss (Wex). Three methodologies are presented and depend on experimental tests such as (i) varying magnetic induction Bm and constant supply frequency (f) of 50 Hz, (ii) constant magnetic induction around 1 T and varying frequency. The first methodology is based on Newton’s method to solve the numerical system generated with experimental data from two laboratory experiments. These data were reported in past references. Another two methodologies are based on genetic algorithms (GA). One of them depends on experimental data from both experiments and the another depends on experimental data only from experiment (i). Results indicate that genetic algorithms method presents excellent solutions in comparison with other ones. The GA method with two tests allows a better representation of the experimental behavior of the sample with maximum errors varying from 1.10% to 0.20%. In GA method with one test, minimization varied from 6.924 × 10−05 to 3.186 × 10−05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications (JMOe), published by the Brazilian Microwave and Optoelectronics Society (SBMO) and Brazilian Society of Electromagnetism (SBMag), is a professional, refereed publication devoted to disseminating technical information in the areas of Microwaves, Optoelectronics, Photonics, and Electromagnetic Applications. Authors are invited to submit original work in one or more of the following topics. Electromagnetic Field Analysis[...] Computer Aided Design [...] Microwave Technologies [...] Photonic Technologies [...] Packaging, Integration and Test [...] Millimeter Wave Technologies [...] Electromagnetic Applications[...] Other Topics [...] Antennas [...] Articles in all aspects of microwave, optoelectronics, photonic devices and applications will be covered in the journal. All submitted papers will be peer-reviewed under supervision of the editors and the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信