{"title":"ica D、eno、sar A、agr基因检测在假体周围关节感染早期诊断中的应用","authors":"Jie Lin, Yong-Xie Jin, Q. Pang","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-21-00021.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study intends to explore the diagnostic efficiency and value of PCR in the early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on the testing of the four staphylococcal specific genes ica D, eno, sar A and agr. Methods 41 samples of ultrasonic cleavage RNA eluate were extracted from the human joint model of PJI caused by the five most common PJI pathogens to detect the PCR of ica D, eno, sar A and agr genes. Based on the detection results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the four genes were analyzed and compared. Results eno test had a high sensitivity (83.33%). However, more false positive results affected the test specificity (47.06%); sar A test did not show false positive results, but the specificity was high (100%), but the sensitivity was low (41.67%); the sensitivity of ica D and agr test was 4.17% and 0%, respectively, and the clinical value was limited. Conclusion eno and sar A gene detection is of high value in early diagnosis of PJI. Reasonable design and sequential application of eno sensitivity preliminary diagnosis and sar A specific screening of false positive results are more beneficial to the early diagnosis of staphylococcal pathogenic PJI.","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of ica D, eno, sar A and agr gene testing in early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection\",\"authors\":\"Jie Lin, Yong-Xie Jin, Q. Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.9738/intsurg-d-21-00021.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective This study intends to explore the diagnostic efficiency and value of PCR in the early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on the testing of the four staphylococcal specific genes ica D, eno, sar A and agr. Methods 41 samples of ultrasonic cleavage RNA eluate were extracted from the human joint model of PJI caused by the five most common PJI pathogens to detect the PCR of ica D, eno, sar A and agr genes. Based on the detection results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the four genes were analyzed and compared. Results eno test had a high sensitivity (83.33%). However, more false positive results affected the test specificity (47.06%); sar A test did not show false positive results, but the specificity was high (100%), but the sensitivity was low (41.67%); the sensitivity of ica D and agr test was 4.17% and 0%, respectively, and the clinical value was limited. Conclusion eno and sar A gene detection is of high value in early diagnosis of PJI. Reasonable design and sequential application of eno sensitivity preliminary diagnosis and sar A specific screening of false positive results are more beneficial to the early diagnosis of staphylococcal pathogenic PJI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-21-00021.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-21-00021.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of ica D, eno, sar A and agr gene testing in early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
Objective This study intends to explore the diagnostic efficiency and value of PCR in the early diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on the testing of the four staphylococcal specific genes ica D, eno, sar A and agr. Methods 41 samples of ultrasonic cleavage RNA eluate were extracted from the human joint model of PJI caused by the five most common PJI pathogens to detect the PCR of ica D, eno, sar A and agr genes. Based on the detection results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the four genes were analyzed and compared. Results eno test had a high sensitivity (83.33%). However, more false positive results affected the test specificity (47.06%); sar A test did not show false positive results, but the specificity was high (100%), but the sensitivity was low (41.67%); the sensitivity of ica D and agr test was 4.17% and 0%, respectively, and the clinical value was limited. Conclusion eno and sar A gene detection is of high value in early diagnosis of PJI. Reasonable design and sequential application of eno sensitivity preliminary diagnosis and sar A specific screening of false positive results are more beneficial to the early diagnosis of staphylococcal pathogenic PJI.
期刊介绍:
International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field.
The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include:
-worldwide internet transmission
-prompt peer reviews
-timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts
-even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published.
Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.