学术交流系统中的“裂缝”:来自早期职业研究人员的纵向国际研究的见解

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard
{"title":"学术交流系统中的“裂缝”:来自早期职业研究人员的纵向国际研究的见解","authors":"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo,&nbsp;Eti Herman,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Galina Serbina,&nbsp;David Sims,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson,&nbsp;Hamid R. Jamali,&nbsp;Carol Tenopir,&nbsp;Suzie Allard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\n \n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\n \n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas,&nbsp;Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri,&nbsp;Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo,&nbsp;Eti Herman,&nbsp;Abdullah Abrizah,&nbsp;David Clark,&nbsp;Galina Serbina,&nbsp;David Sims,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń,&nbsp;Jie Xu,&nbsp;Anthony Watkinson,&nbsp;Hamid R. Jamali,&nbsp;Carol Tenopir,&nbsp;Suzie Allard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\\n \\n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\\n \\n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

170名早期职业研究人员在两年多的时间里接受了三次采访,他们对学术交流的压力测试做出了独特的贡献,并发现了裂缝。千禧一代价值观的融合和大流行造成的完美风暴似乎加速了破解过程,也许是为了好。有问题的漏洞是:(1)同行评议;(2)声誉评价;(3)不道德/有问题的行为;(4)协作;(5)网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers

  • 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
  • The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
  • The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信