David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard
{"title":"学术交流系统中的“裂缝”:来自早期职业研究人员的纵向国际研究的见解","authors":"David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\n \n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\n \n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, David Clark, Galina Serbina, David Sims, Marzena Świgoń, Jie Xu, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.</li>\\n \\n <li>The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.</li>\\n \\n <li>The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers
170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.