本质与偶然:拜占庭肖像画与亚里士多德哲学

IF 0.3 4区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1017/byz.2021.28

H. Maguire

{"title":"本质与偶然:拜占庭肖像画与亚里士多德哲学","authors":"H. Maguire","doi":"10.1017/byz.2021.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presentation of portraits of emperors and saints in Byzantine art can be compared to theories of physiognomy and logic put forward by Aristotle and his Byzantine followers. Similar observations have been made about the portal sculptures of High Gothic cathedrals, but although the ordering of images in the two cases reflected similar patterns of thought, the particular forms of the portraits differed in each milieu, responding to a different relationship between images and the faithful in each society.","PeriodicalId":43258,"journal":{"name":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essence and accident: Byzantine portraiture and Aristotelian philosophy\",\"authors\":\"H. Maguire\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/byz.2021.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presentation of portraits of emperors and saints in Byzantine art can be compared to theories of physiognomy and logic put forward by Aristotle and his Byzantine followers. Similar observations have been made about the portal sculptures of High Gothic cathedrals, but although the ordering of images in the two cases reflected similar patterns of thought, the particular forms of the portraits differed in each milieu, responding to a different relationship between images and the faithful in each society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2021.28\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2021.28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

拜占庭艺术中皇帝和圣人肖像的呈现可以与亚里士多德及其拜占庭追随者提出的面相学和逻辑学理论相比较。关于高哥特式大教堂的入口雕塑也有类似的观察，但是尽管这两个案例中的图像顺序反映了相似的思维模式，但每个环境中肖像的特定形式不同，回应了每个社会中图像与信徒之间的不同关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Essence and accident: Byzantine portraiture and Aristotelian philosophy

The presentation of portraits of emperors and saints in Byzantine art can be compared to theories of physiognomy and logic put forward by Aristotle and his Byzantine followers. Similar observations have been made about the portal sculptures of High Gothic cathedrals, but although the ordering of images in the two cases reflected similar patterns of thought, the particular forms of the portraits differed in each milieu, responding to a different relationship between images and the faithful in each society.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies is an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published twice a year in spring and autumn, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of Byzantine and Modern Greek scholarship, whether historical, literary or social-anthropological. It welcomes research, criticism, contributions on theory and method in the form of articles, critical studies and short notes.