厚望:波兰高速公路建设抢救考古项目20周年反思

Q2 Arts and Humanities
L. Czerniak, A. Kośko
{"title":"厚望:波兰高速公路建设抢救考古项目20周年反思","authors":"L. Czerniak, A. Kośko","doi":"10.23858/sa71.2019.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the political, legal and organisational aspects of rescue excavations carried out in advance of motorway construction in Poland during the 20 years that have elapsed since this development-led archaeology programme was first implemented. This analysis, which is deliberately one-sided, tries to determine why this comprehensive and ambitious programme was downgraded ten years after its launch and now bears little resemblance to the original concept. Why, despite the existence of an appropriate legal framework and the supervision of the National Heritage Protection Service, was it possible to breach the basic provisions of the European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (La Valetta, 1992), which states that rescue excavations should be governed by the principles of scientific research? The authors believe that the successful implementation of complex, long-term and costly projects funded by the public purse does not depend solely on having legal and organisational structures in place as well as professionals with the relevant experience to call on. Critical factors, particularly in countries emerging from authoritarian rule, as was the case with Poland at the turn of the century, include the (often changeable) political will of government, a lack of public engagement with archaeology and the absence of widely accepted professional standards in archaeological practice.","PeriodicalId":37678,"journal":{"name":"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Great expectations: reflections on the 20th anniversary of Poland’s motorway construction rescue archaeology programme\",\"authors\":\"L. Czerniak, A. Kośko\",\"doi\":\"10.23858/sa71.2019.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the political, legal and organisational aspects of rescue excavations carried out in advance of motorway construction in Poland during the 20 years that have elapsed since this development-led archaeology programme was first implemented. This analysis, which is deliberately one-sided, tries to determine why this comprehensive and ambitious programme was downgraded ten years after its launch and now bears little resemblance to the original concept. Why, despite the existence of an appropriate legal framework and the supervision of the National Heritage Protection Service, was it possible to breach the basic provisions of the European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (La Valetta, 1992), which states that rescue excavations should be governed by the principles of scientific research? The authors believe that the successful implementation of complex, long-term and costly projects funded by the public purse does not depend solely on having legal and organisational structures in place as well as professionals with the relevant experience to call on. Critical factors, particularly in countries emerging from authoritarian rule, as was the case with Poland at the turn of the century, include the (often changeable) political will of government, a lack of public engagement with archaeology and the absence of widely accepted professional standards in archaeological practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23858/sa71.2019.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/sa71.2019.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了自这一以发展为主导的考古计划首次实施以来的20年里,在波兰高速公路建设之前进行的救援挖掘的政治、法律和组织方面。这种分析是故意片面的,试图确定为什么这个全面而雄心勃勃的计划在推出十年后被降级,现在与最初的概念几乎没有相似之处。尽管有适当的法律框架和国家遗产保护局的监督,为什么有可能违反《欧洲考古遗产保护公约》(La Valetta,1992)的基本规定,该公约规定抢救性发掘应遵循科学研究原则?作者认为,由公共资金资助的复杂、长期和昂贵的项目能否成功实施,不仅仅取决于是否有适当的法律和组织结构,以及是否有相关经验的专业人员,正如世纪之交波兰的情况一样,包括政府的政治意愿(往往是多变的)、公众对考古缺乏参与以及考古实践中缺乏广泛接受的专业标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Great expectations: reflections on the 20th anniversary of Poland’s motorway construction rescue archaeology programme
This paper examines the political, legal and organisational aspects of rescue excavations carried out in advance of motorway construction in Poland during the 20 years that have elapsed since this development-led archaeology programme was first implemented. This analysis, which is deliberately one-sided, tries to determine why this comprehensive and ambitious programme was downgraded ten years after its launch and now bears little resemblance to the original concept. Why, despite the existence of an appropriate legal framework and the supervision of the National Heritage Protection Service, was it possible to breach the basic provisions of the European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (La Valetta, 1992), which states that rescue excavations should be governed by the principles of scientific research? The authors believe that the successful implementation of complex, long-term and costly projects funded by the public purse does not depend solely on having legal and organisational structures in place as well as professionals with the relevant experience to call on. Critical factors, particularly in countries emerging from authoritarian rule, as was the case with Poland at the turn of the century, include the (often changeable) political will of government, a lack of public engagement with archaeology and the absence of widely accepted professional standards in archaeological practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Sprawozdania Archeologiczneis a peer-reviewed Polish archaeological journal edited and published annually in English and German by the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, intended especially for Polish and Central-European readership. Its main aim is to present a wide range of approaches to issues in contemporary archaeology and to publish materials and findings of field surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信