危机电影:电影与当代欧洲

Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17411548.2022.2073771
Mariana Liz
{"title":"危机电影:电影与当代欧洲","authors":"Mariana Liz","doi":"10.1080/17411548.2022.2073771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cinema of Crisis: Film and Contemporary Europe came out two years after the symposium upon which it was based, and which took place at the University of Leeds in 2018. By the time of the book’s release, then, the financial crisis that had most likely motivated this initiative, even if its effects were still being felt, had been overcome in most European countries – only for a very different crisis to hit Europe, as well as the rest of the world. Indeed, 2020 will certainly be remembered as one of the most difficult years in recent decades, with the pandemic caused by the Covid-19 virus having permanent implications for the globe’s political, social and cultural life. While it may seem irrelevant to read this collection of essays through the lens of Covid-19, since no one could foresee what was to come during the period of the book’s production, many of the issues raised by Cinema of Crisis are not only tied to, but have also been exacerbated by the pandemic. And this connection to the pandemic contributes to the volume’s ongoing relevance. A timely contribution to important debates arising in Europe and contemporary film about intersectional forms of marginality and discrimination, Austin and Koutsourakis nonetheless face a key challenge when writing about Europe, namely to present a comprehensive rather than a merely comparative approach. Although the volume’s case studies are clearly focused on different European countries, the European dimension is, however, not foregrounded by the editors – and the reader is not told how many pieces from or about which countries are included in the book, with many of the chapters addressing films and national contexts covered elsewhere in the volume. If the European dimension is not clearly addressed, the crisis also appears as too vague a signifier for the volume’s main title to emerge as particularly meaningful. The introduction collates a series of statements about the state of the world without telling the reader what the potential implications are of the facts described, or how contemporary European cinema can help us to rethink these topics beyond an illustrative character. A telling paragraph of the vagueness that characterises the introduction’s writing, could, until its very last words, be about any film style, period or grouping. As follows:","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinema of crisis: film and contemporary Europe\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Liz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17411548.2022.2073771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cinema of Crisis: Film and Contemporary Europe came out two years after the symposium upon which it was based, and which took place at the University of Leeds in 2018. By the time of the book’s release, then, the financial crisis that had most likely motivated this initiative, even if its effects were still being felt, had been overcome in most European countries – only for a very different crisis to hit Europe, as well as the rest of the world. Indeed, 2020 will certainly be remembered as one of the most difficult years in recent decades, with the pandemic caused by the Covid-19 virus having permanent implications for the globe’s political, social and cultural life. While it may seem irrelevant to read this collection of essays through the lens of Covid-19, since no one could foresee what was to come during the period of the book’s production, many of the issues raised by Cinema of Crisis are not only tied to, but have also been exacerbated by the pandemic. And this connection to the pandemic contributes to the volume’s ongoing relevance. A timely contribution to important debates arising in Europe and contemporary film about intersectional forms of marginality and discrimination, Austin and Koutsourakis nonetheless face a key challenge when writing about Europe, namely to present a comprehensive rather than a merely comparative approach. Although the volume’s case studies are clearly focused on different European countries, the European dimension is, however, not foregrounded by the editors – and the reader is not told how many pieces from or about which countries are included in the book, with many of the chapters addressing films and national contexts covered elsewhere in the volume. If the European dimension is not clearly addressed, the crisis also appears as too vague a signifier for the volume’s main title to emerge as particularly meaningful. The introduction collates a series of statements about the state of the world without telling the reader what the potential implications are of the facts described, or how contemporary European cinema can help us to rethink these topics beyond an illustrative character. A telling paragraph of the vagueness that characterises the introduction’s writing, could, until its very last words, be about any film style, period or grouping. As follows:\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2022.2073771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2022.2073771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《危机电影:电影与当代欧洲》是在2018年利兹大学举办的研讨会两年后出版的。到这本书出版之时,最有可能推动这一倡议的金融危机——尽管其影响仍在显现——已在大多数欧洲国家被克服——只是另一场截然不同的危机袭击了欧洲和世界其他地区。事实上,2020年肯定会被铭记为近几十年来最困难的一年之一,2019冠状病毒病引起的大流行对全球政治、社会和文化生活产生了永久性影响。虽然从2019冠状病毒病的角度来阅读这本散文集似乎无关紧要,因为没有人能预见在这本书的创作期间会发生什么,但《危机电影》提出的许多问题不仅与疫情有关,而且还因疫情而加剧。这种与大流行病的联系有助于本卷的持续相关性。奥斯汀和库苏拉基斯及时地对欧洲和当代电影中关于边缘性和歧视的交叉形式的重要辩论做出了贡献,尽管如此,在写欧洲时,他们面临着一个关键的挑战,即呈现一个全面的而不仅仅是比较的方法。尽管这本书的案例研究显然集中在不同的欧洲国家,但欧洲的维度并没有被编辑们所重视——读者也没有被告知书中包含了多少来自哪个国家的作品,许多关于电影和国家背景的章节都在本书的其他地方。如果欧洲层面的问题没有得到明确的解决,那么这场危机也似乎是一个过于模糊的象征,以至于本书的主要标题显得特别有意义。引言整理了一系列关于世界状况的陈述,但没有告诉读者所描述的事实的潜在含义是什么,也没有告诉读者当代欧洲电影如何帮助我们超越说明性的角色来重新思考这些主题。在引言的最后几句话之前,它可以是关于任何电影风格、时期或群体的。如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Cinema of crisis: film and contemporary Europe
Cinema of Crisis: Film and Contemporary Europe came out two years after the symposium upon which it was based, and which took place at the University of Leeds in 2018. By the time of the book’s release, then, the financial crisis that had most likely motivated this initiative, even if its effects were still being felt, had been overcome in most European countries – only for a very different crisis to hit Europe, as well as the rest of the world. Indeed, 2020 will certainly be remembered as one of the most difficult years in recent decades, with the pandemic caused by the Covid-19 virus having permanent implications for the globe’s political, social and cultural life. While it may seem irrelevant to read this collection of essays through the lens of Covid-19, since no one could foresee what was to come during the period of the book’s production, many of the issues raised by Cinema of Crisis are not only tied to, but have also been exacerbated by the pandemic. And this connection to the pandemic contributes to the volume’s ongoing relevance. A timely contribution to important debates arising in Europe and contemporary film about intersectional forms of marginality and discrimination, Austin and Koutsourakis nonetheless face a key challenge when writing about Europe, namely to present a comprehensive rather than a merely comparative approach. Although the volume’s case studies are clearly focused on different European countries, the European dimension is, however, not foregrounded by the editors – and the reader is not told how many pieces from or about which countries are included in the book, with many of the chapters addressing films and national contexts covered elsewhere in the volume. If the European dimension is not clearly addressed, the crisis also appears as too vague a signifier for the volume’s main title to emerge as particularly meaningful. The introduction collates a series of statements about the state of the world without telling the reader what the potential implications are of the facts described, or how contemporary European cinema can help us to rethink these topics beyond an illustrative character. A telling paragraph of the vagueness that characterises the introduction’s writing, could, until its very last words, be about any film style, period or grouping. As follows:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信