Axel Buchner, Pia Helbing, Abdulkadir Mohamed, Hyungseok (David) Yoon
{"title":"历史军事冲突与跨国风险投资绩效:所有权控制的作用","authors":"Axel Buchner, Pia Helbing, Abdulkadir Mohamed, Hyungseok (David) Yoon","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the effect of historical military conflict (between the home countries of venture capital (VC) firms and portfolio companies) on the performance of cross-border VC investments. Using exhaustive data on global cross-border investments during 1986–2017, we find that adverse memories imprinted by historical military conflict have a negative effect on cross-border performance as measured by internal rate of return and public market equivalent. We show that nation-dyadic (i.e. political affinity) and ownership control strategy (i.e. board seat and syndication)-related contingencies moderate the relationship between historical military conflict and cross-border performance. Collectively, our findings shed light on the presence of intergroup interaction challenges and mistrust when investing in cross-border VC deals and demonstrate channels to mitigate their adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Management","volume":"35 2","pages":"992-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12749","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Military Conflict and Cross-Border VC Performance: The Role of Ownership Control\",\"authors\":\"Axel Buchner, Pia Helbing, Abdulkadir Mohamed, Hyungseok (David) Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8551.12749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the effect of historical military conflict (between the home countries of venture capital (VC) firms and portfolio companies) on the performance of cross-border VC investments. Using exhaustive data on global cross-border investments during 1986–2017, we find that adverse memories imprinted by historical military conflict have a negative effect on cross-border performance as measured by internal rate of return and public market equivalent. We show that nation-dyadic (i.e. political affinity) and ownership control strategy (i.e. board seat and syndication)-related contingencies moderate the relationship between historical military conflict and cross-border performance. Collectively, our findings shed light on the presence of intergroup interaction challenges and mistrust when investing in cross-border VC deals and demonstrate channels to mitigate their adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"992-1013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12749\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12749\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Historical Military Conflict and Cross-Border VC Performance: The Role of Ownership Control
This study investigates the effect of historical military conflict (between the home countries of venture capital (VC) firms and portfolio companies) on the performance of cross-border VC investments. Using exhaustive data on global cross-border investments during 1986–2017, we find that adverse memories imprinted by historical military conflict have a negative effect on cross-border performance as measured by internal rate of return and public market equivalent. We show that nation-dyadic (i.e. political affinity) and ownership control strategy (i.e. board seat and syndication)-related contingencies moderate the relationship between historical military conflict and cross-border performance. Collectively, our findings shed light on the presence of intergroup interaction challenges and mistrust when investing in cross-border VC deals and demonstrate channels to mitigate their adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Management provides a valuable outlet for research and scholarship on management-orientated themes and topics. It publishes articles of a multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature as well as empirical research from within traditional disciplines and managerial functions. With contributions from around the globe, the journal includes articles across the full range of business and management disciplines. A subscription to British Journal of Management includes International Journal of Management Reviews, also published on behalf of the British Academy of Management.