{"title":"劳特利奇节日手册","authors":"David Teevan","doi":"10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tural occupations influences the very art that is composed and presented, which only serves to cement the norms people would hope to dislodge. Further, because it is so competitive to succeed in the cultural sector, those at the top are likely to have convinced themselves that while they may have had some “luck” along the way, they work in a world that is in fact meritocratic; this is true even though their political views lean predominantly to the left. And this is not new; to answer the question posed above, no, there was no golden age, and the arts have never been an engine of social mobility (though there are an exceptional few who do rise from the working class). All of this puts a tremendous burden on women and people from minorities. They can either endure the struggle of trying their best to fit with what is seen in the industry as the somatic norm or face persistent difficulties in finding work or advancement in the field. This sits atop the pressure of knowing that the opportunities for work in the cultural occupations is unequal; our well-being is reduced not only by not gaining the opportunities we hope for, but also for simply knowing it is an unfair contest. It weighs heavily. So, what is to be done? Two things. First, the degree of inequality in the cultural sector must be made visible. The stories of experienced inequality contained in this book, and all the thousands of others with their own experiences, must be told and heard. Those who possess all the advantages of “being the right fit” need deep understanding of the barriers facing those who do not. Second, and this will take longer: the “somatic norms” of the actor, the curator, the book reviewer, the film director, need to change. As that change takes place, the art that is made and presented to us will change, and so will the opportunities for all people to see something of themselves on stage, on the screen, and in the bookshop. Then culture will be good for you. This is the most vital book in cultural affairs I have read in years.","PeriodicalId":45760,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Festivals\",\"authors\":\"David Teevan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tural occupations influences the very art that is composed and presented, which only serves to cement the norms people would hope to dislodge. Further, because it is so competitive to succeed in the cultural sector, those at the top are likely to have convinced themselves that while they may have had some “luck” along the way, they work in a world that is in fact meritocratic; this is true even though their political views lean predominantly to the left. And this is not new; to answer the question posed above, no, there was no golden age, and the arts have never been an engine of social mobility (though there are an exceptional few who do rise from the working class). All of this puts a tremendous burden on women and people from minorities. They can either endure the struggle of trying their best to fit with what is seen in the industry as the somatic norm or face persistent difficulties in finding work or advancement in the field. This sits atop the pressure of knowing that the opportunities for work in the cultural occupations is unequal; our well-being is reduced not only by not gaining the opportunities we hope for, but also for simply knowing it is an unfair contest. It weighs heavily. So, what is to be done? Two things. First, the degree of inequality in the cultural sector must be made visible. The stories of experienced inequality contained in this book, and all the thousands of others with their own experiences, must be told and heard. Those who possess all the advantages of “being the right fit” need deep understanding of the barriers facing those who do not. Second, and this will take longer: the “somatic norms” of the actor, the curator, the book reviewer, the film director, need to change. As that change takes place, the art that is made and presented to us will change, and so will the opportunities for all people to see something of themselves on stage, on the screen, and in the bookshop. Then culture will be good for you. This is the most vital book in cultural affairs I have read in years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
tural occupations influences the very art that is composed and presented, which only serves to cement the norms people would hope to dislodge. Further, because it is so competitive to succeed in the cultural sector, those at the top are likely to have convinced themselves that while they may have had some “luck” along the way, they work in a world that is in fact meritocratic; this is true even though their political views lean predominantly to the left. And this is not new; to answer the question posed above, no, there was no golden age, and the arts have never been an engine of social mobility (though there are an exceptional few who do rise from the working class). All of this puts a tremendous burden on women and people from minorities. They can either endure the struggle of trying their best to fit with what is seen in the industry as the somatic norm or face persistent difficulties in finding work or advancement in the field. This sits atop the pressure of knowing that the opportunities for work in the cultural occupations is unequal; our well-being is reduced not only by not gaining the opportunities we hope for, but also for simply knowing it is an unfair contest. It weighs heavily. So, what is to be done? Two things. First, the degree of inequality in the cultural sector must be made visible. The stories of experienced inequality contained in this book, and all the thousands of others with their own experiences, must be told and heard. Those who possess all the advantages of “being the right fit” need deep understanding of the barriers facing those who do not. Second, and this will take longer: the “somatic norms” of the actor, the curator, the book reviewer, the film director, need to change. As that change takes place, the art that is made and presented to us will change, and so will the opportunities for all people to see something of themselves on stage, on the screen, and in the bookshop. Then culture will be good for you. This is the most vital book in cultural affairs I have read in years.
期刊介绍:
How will technology change the arts world? Who owns what in the information age? How will museums survive in the future? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society has supplied answers to these kinds of questions for more than twenty-five years, becoming the authoritative resource for arts policymakers and analysts, sociologists, arts and cultural administrators, educators, trustees, artists, lawyers, and citizens concerned with the performing, visual, and media arts, as well as cultural affairs. Articles, commentaries, and reviews of publications address marketing, intellectual property, arts policy, arts law, governance, and cultural production and dissemination, always from a variety of philosophical, disciplinary, and national and international perspectives.