不同归一化方法对简单WISP方法结果的分析

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
E. Zavadskas, D. Stanujkić, D. Karabašević, Zenonas Turskis
{"title":"不同归一化方法对简单WISP方法结果的分析","authors":"E. Zavadskas, D. Stanujkić, D. Karabašević, Zenonas Turskis","doi":"10.24846/v31i1y202201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard WISP method uses the max normalization procedure. In order to check its robustness, the use of the WISP method with square root and sum normalization procedures is discussed in this article. In order to check the similarity of the obtained results, several analyzes were performed using the Python programming language, where the similarity of the obtained results was checked using the cosine similarity measure. The similarity was also checked concerning the results obtained using prominent MCDM methods. The achieved results confirm the significant similarity of the results obtained using the WISP method with the results obtained using the selected MCDM methods, even in the case of using square rot or sum normalization procedures.","PeriodicalId":49466,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Informatics and Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Simple WISP Method Results Using Different Normalization Procedures\",\"authors\":\"E. Zavadskas, D. Stanujkić, D. Karabašević, Zenonas Turskis\",\"doi\":\"10.24846/v31i1y202201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The standard WISP method uses the max normalization procedure. In order to check its robustness, the use of the WISP method with square root and sum normalization procedures is discussed in this article. In order to check the similarity of the obtained results, several analyzes were performed using the Python programming language, where the similarity of the obtained results was checked using the cosine similarity measure. The similarity was also checked concerning the results obtained using prominent MCDM methods. The achieved results confirm the significant similarity of the results obtained using the WISP method with the results obtained using the selected MCDM methods, even in the case of using square rot or sum normalization procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Informatics and Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Informatics and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24846/v31i1y202201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Informatics and Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24846/v31i1y202201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

标准WISP方法使用最大归一化程序。为了检验其鲁棒性,本文讨论了WISP方法与平方根和归一化过程的使用。为了检查所获得的结果的相似性,使用Python编程语言进行了几次分析,其中使用余弦相似性度量检查所获得结果的相似度。还检查了使用突出的MCDM方法获得的结果的相似性。所获得的结果证实了使用WISP方法获得的结果与使用所选MCDM方法获得的成果的显著相似性,即使在使用平方腐烂或求和归一化程序的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Simple WISP Method Results Using Different Normalization Procedures
The standard WISP method uses the max normalization procedure. In order to check its robustness, the use of the WISP method with square root and sum normalization procedures is discussed in this article. In order to check the similarity of the obtained results, several analyzes were performed using the Python programming language, where the similarity of the obtained results was checked using the cosine similarity measure. The similarity was also checked concerning the results obtained using prominent MCDM methods. The achieved results confirm the significant similarity of the results obtained using the WISP method with the results obtained using the selected MCDM methods, even in the case of using square rot or sum normalization procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Informatics and Control
Studies in Informatics and Control AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in Informatics and Control journal provides important perspectives on topics relevant to Information Technology, with an emphasis on useful applications in the most important areas of IT. This journal is aimed at advanced practitioners and researchers in the field of IT and welcomes original contributions from scholars and professionals worldwide. SIC is published both in print and online by the National Institute for R&D in Informatics, ICI Bucharest. Abstracts, full text and graphics of all articles in the online version of SIC are identical to the print version of the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信