{"title":"用文献计量学方法构建医学论文评价体系","authors":"Hongxia Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nConstructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics. \n \n \nMethods \nTaking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification. \n \n \nResults \nThe score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers. \n \n \nConclusions \nIt is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation. \n \n \nKey words: \nBibliometrics; Index; Paper; Evaluation","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"89-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing the medical paper evaluation system by bibliometrics\",\"authors\":\"Hongxia Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nConstructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nTaking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nIt is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nBibliometrics; Index; Paper; Evaluation\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"89-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constructing the medical paper evaluation system by bibliometrics
Objective
Constructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics.
Methods
Taking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification.
Results
The score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers.
Conclusions
It is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation.
Key words:
Bibliometrics; Index; Paper; Evaluation