公司是否已根据ED国际财务报告准则S1及S2为可持续发展报告做好准备?来自波兰的证据

Magdalena Indyk
{"title":"公司是否已根据ED国际财务报告准则S1及S2为可持续发展报告做好准备?来自波兰的证据","authors":"Magdalena Indyk","doi":"10.20869/auditf/2022/168/022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aimed to determine the implications of the Exposure Drafts (ED) IFRS S1 and S2, especially for financial reporting. The novelty of these sustainability standards is the attempt to regulate sustainability and climate-related financial information. Therefore, the article first presents the key aspects of the ED IFRS S1 and S2, and their practical implications. As both EDs represent an ambitious proposal of standard-setters, the author attempted to determine whether companies in Poland are prepared for these changes. For this reason, the EDs were confronted with (1) Poland’s legal and soft sustainability regulations, and (2) empirical research results. An empirical part was performed based on the selection of 177 companies, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). The evidence represents the collection of their responses to the selected ESG sections of “The Best Practice 2021” WSE Code. The study provides numerous conclusions and observations. ESG undoubtedly became a factor considered by multiple companies in their businesses. However, preparing for the ED IFRS S1 and S2 means a complete ESG integration into a business strategy, processes, and reporting. Only sixty companies (34%) in the examined sample declare ESG integration into a business strategy, and thirty-two companies (18%) claim they disclose the strategic data, including defined goals, measures, and progress (also ESG-related). Considering the progress of the ESG revolution, it will mean reporting transformation for most companies, i.e., building sustainability-related financial reporting from scratch. The biggest challenge will be quantifying the impact of sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities on financial statements. Such quantification will require advanced risk management tools and the building of an integrated reporting system. The article, with its findings, may be of high interest to standard-setters, companies, and other researchers contributing to ESG and financial reporting.","PeriodicalId":30958,"journal":{"name":"Audit Financiar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the Companies Prepared for Sustainability Reporting under the ED IFRS S1 and S2? Evidence from Poland\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Indyk\",\"doi\":\"10.20869/auditf/2022/168/022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aimed to determine the implications of the Exposure Drafts (ED) IFRS S1 and S2, especially for financial reporting. The novelty of these sustainability standards is the attempt to regulate sustainability and climate-related financial information. Therefore, the article first presents the key aspects of the ED IFRS S1 and S2, and their practical implications. As both EDs represent an ambitious proposal of standard-setters, the author attempted to determine whether companies in Poland are prepared for these changes. For this reason, the EDs were confronted with (1) Poland’s legal and soft sustainability regulations, and (2) empirical research results. An empirical part was performed based on the selection of 177 companies, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). The evidence represents the collection of their responses to the selected ESG sections of “The Best Practice 2021” WSE Code. The study provides numerous conclusions and observations. ESG undoubtedly became a factor considered by multiple companies in their businesses. However, preparing for the ED IFRS S1 and S2 means a complete ESG integration into a business strategy, processes, and reporting. Only sixty companies (34%) in the examined sample declare ESG integration into a business strategy, and thirty-two companies (18%) claim they disclose the strategic data, including defined goals, measures, and progress (also ESG-related). Considering the progress of the ESG revolution, it will mean reporting transformation for most companies, i.e., building sustainability-related financial reporting from scratch. The biggest challenge will be quantifying the impact of sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities on financial statements. Such quantification will require advanced risk management tools and the building of an integrated reporting system. The article, with its findings, may be of high interest to standard-setters, companies, and other researchers contributing to ESG and financial reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audit Financiar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audit Financiar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20869/auditf/2022/168/022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audit Financiar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20869/auditf/2022/168/022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在确定《国际财务报告准则第S1号》和《国际财务报告准则第S2号征求意见稿》的影响,特别是对财务报告的影响。这些可持续性标准的新颖之处在于试图规范可持续性和与气候相关的财务信息。因此,本文首先介绍了ED IFRS S1和S2的关键方面及其实际意义。由于这两份报告都代表了标准制定者雄心勃勃的提议,作者试图确定波兰的公司是否为这些变化做好了准备。为此,EDs面临着(1)波兰的法律和软可持续性法规,以及(2)实证研究结果。实证部分选取了华沙证券交易所(WSE)上市的177家公司。这些证据是他们对WSE准则“最佳实践2021”中选定的ESG部分的回应的集合。这项研究提供了许多结论和观察。毫无疑问,ESG成为许多公司在其业务中考虑的一个因素。然而,为ED IFRS S1和S2做准备意味着将ESG完全整合到业务战略、流程和报告中。在被调查的样本中,只有60家公司(34%)宣布将ESG整合到企业战略中,32家公司(18%)声称他们披露了战略数据,包括确定的目标、措施和进展(也与ESG相关)。考虑到ESG革命的进展,这将意味着大多数公司的报告转型,即从零开始建立与可持续发展相关的财务报告。最大的挑战将是量化可持续性和气候相关风险和机遇对财务报表的影响。这种量化将需要先进的风险管理工具和建立一个综合报告系统。这篇文章及其发现可能会引起标准制定者、公司和其他研究ESG和财务报告的研究人员的高度兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the Companies Prepared for Sustainability Reporting under the ED IFRS S1 and S2? Evidence from Poland
This article aimed to determine the implications of the Exposure Drafts (ED) IFRS S1 and S2, especially for financial reporting. The novelty of these sustainability standards is the attempt to regulate sustainability and climate-related financial information. Therefore, the article first presents the key aspects of the ED IFRS S1 and S2, and their practical implications. As both EDs represent an ambitious proposal of standard-setters, the author attempted to determine whether companies in Poland are prepared for these changes. For this reason, the EDs were confronted with (1) Poland’s legal and soft sustainability regulations, and (2) empirical research results. An empirical part was performed based on the selection of 177 companies, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). The evidence represents the collection of their responses to the selected ESG sections of “The Best Practice 2021” WSE Code. The study provides numerous conclusions and observations. ESG undoubtedly became a factor considered by multiple companies in their businesses. However, preparing for the ED IFRS S1 and S2 means a complete ESG integration into a business strategy, processes, and reporting. Only sixty companies (34%) in the examined sample declare ESG integration into a business strategy, and thirty-two companies (18%) claim they disclose the strategic data, including defined goals, measures, and progress (also ESG-related). Considering the progress of the ESG revolution, it will mean reporting transformation for most companies, i.e., building sustainability-related financial reporting from scratch. The biggest challenge will be quantifying the impact of sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities on financial statements. Such quantification will require advanced risk management tools and the building of an integrated reporting system. The article, with its findings, may be of high interest to standard-setters, companies, and other researchers contributing to ESG and financial reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信