澳大利亚东南部的规定焚烧:历史和未来方向

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
G. Morgan, K. Tolhurst, M. Poynter, N. Cooper, T. McGuffog, R. Ryan, M. Wouters, N. Stephens, P. Black, D. Sheehan, P. Leeson, S. Whight, S. Davey
{"title":"澳大利亚东南部的规定焚烧:历史和未来方向","authors":"G. Morgan, K. Tolhurst, M. Poynter, N. Cooper, T. McGuffog, R. Ryan, M. Wouters, N. Stephens, P. Black, D. Sheehan, P. Leeson, S. Whight, S. Davey","doi":"10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fire has been part of the natural environment of south-eastern Australia for tens of millions of years. Aboriginal people used fire selectively, with skill, for many reasons. The removal of Aboriginal people from most of the region after European settlement changed fire regimes and the composition and structure of vegetation. This study explores the history of fire in south-eastern Australia, describes the development of prescribed burning as a forest management tool, and discusses the factors that have influenced changes in fire regimes. It draws on published and unpublished literature and data held by the Forest Fire Management Committee of the Institute of Foresters of Australia. The study finds that the use of prescribed burning in south-eastern Australia in the past 100 years has been driven primarily by political and legal factors. Since 1939, more than 50 public inquiries, reviews and royal commissions have been held into matters concerning the management of fire in landscapes, including prescribed burning. Prescribed burning has been used for wildfire mitigation, agricultural practices (such as stubble reduction and grazing land management), property protection, the maintenance of ecological processes and biodiversity conservation. Prescribed burning in the region has only ever been practised on a small percentage of forest and land each year. The study finds that a substantial body of fire and ecosystem science has been generated in the past 50 years, with rapid technological developments to support prescribed burning and fire management. Research has provided tools and methods for broadscale prescribed burning, but negative public perceptions of fire have prevented the deployment of comprehensive fire management programs in the region. Although much has been achieved, considerable changes are still required in fire management for it to be sustainable and optimal in protecting economic, social and environmental values. The risks to human lives, property, biodiversity and the environment associated with wildfire are increasing in south-eastern Australia due to climate change, and the wider use of prescribed burning is essential for managing these. The increasing extent and occurrence of wildfire disasters in the region indicates that current fire management will not sustain the full range of ecosystem processes and biodiversity, nor reduce to an acceptable level the impact of wildfires on human lives and property. There is compelling evidence for the greater use of prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risks and impacts, rather than committing increasing resources to wildfire suppression. The potential negative impacts of prescribed burning can be managed effectively using existing knowledge and tools. Clear communication of the benefits of prescribed burning can influence political and public opinion in its favour. More investment in training, human capacity and supporting resources is required to safely and effectively deploy prescribed burning more widely to reduce future wildfire risks.","PeriodicalId":55426,"journal":{"name":"Australian Forestry","volume":"83 1","pages":"28 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribed burning in south-eastern Australia: history and future directions\",\"authors\":\"G. Morgan, K. Tolhurst, M. Poynter, N. Cooper, T. McGuffog, R. Ryan, M. Wouters, N. Stephens, P. Black, D. Sheehan, P. Leeson, S. Whight, S. Davey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fire has been part of the natural environment of south-eastern Australia for tens of millions of years. Aboriginal people used fire selectively, with skill, for many reasons. The removal of Aboriginal people from most of the region after European settlement changed fire regimes and the composition and structure of vegetation. This study explores the history of fire in south-eastern Australia, describes the development of prescribed burning as a forest management tool, and discusses the factors that have influenced changes in fire regimes. It draws on published and unpublished literature and data held by the Forest Fire Management Committee of the Institute of Foresters of Australia. The study finds that the use of prescribed burning in south-eastern Australia in the past 100 years has been driven primarily by political and legal factors. Since 1939, more than 50 public inquiries, reviews and royal commissions have been held into matters concerning the management of fire in landscapes, including prescribed burning. Prescribed burning has been used for wildfire mitigation, agricultural practices (such as stubble reduction and grazing land management), property protection, the maintenance of ecological processes and biodiversity conservation. Prescribed burning in the region has only ever been practised on a small percentage of forest and land each year. The study finds that a substantial body of fire and ecosystem science has been generated in the past 50 years, with rapid technological developments to support prescribed burning and fire management. Research has provided tools and methods for broadscale prescribed burning, but negative public perceptions of fire have prevented the deployment of comprehensive fire management programs in the region. Although much has been achieved, considerable changes are still required in fire management for it to be sustainable and optimal in protecting economic, social and environmental values. The risks to human lives, property, biodiversity and the environment associated with wildfire are increasing in south-eastern Australia due to climate change, and the wider use of prescribed burning is essential for managing these. The increasing extent and occurrence of wildfire disasters in the region indicates that current fire management will not sustain the full range of ecosystem processes and biodiversity, nor reduce to an acceptable level the impact of wildfires on human lives and property. There is compelling evidence for the greater use of prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risks and impacts, rather than committing increasing resources to wildfire suppression. The potential negative impacts of prescribed burning can be managed effectively using existing knowledge and tools. Clear communication of the benefits of prescribed burning can influence political and public opinion in its favour. More investment in training, human capacity and supporting resources is required to safely and effectively deploy prescribed burning more widely to reduce future wildfire risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1739883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

摘要数千万年来,火灾一直是澳大利亚东南部自然环境的一部分。出于多种原因,原住民有选择地、熟练地使用火。欧洲人定居后,原住民从该地区大部分地区迁移,改变了火灾制度以及植被的组成和结构。本研究探讨了澳大利亚东南部的火灾历史,描述了规定焚烧作为森林管理工具的发展,并讨论了影响火灾制度变化的因素。它借鉴了澳大利亚林业研究所森林火灾管理委员会已发表和未发表的文献和数据。研究发现,在过去100年中,澳大利亚东南部使用规定焚烧的主要原因是政治和法律因素。自1939年以来,已经对包括规定焚烧在内的景观火灾管理问题进行了50多次公开调查、审查和皇家委员会。规定的焚烧已用于缓解野火、农业实践(如减少残茬和牧场管理)、财产保护、生态过程维护和生物多样性保护。该地区每年只在一小部分森林和土地上进行规定的焚烧。研究发现,在过去的50年里,随着技术的快速发展,支持规定的燃烧和火灾管理,产生了大量的火灾和生态系统科学。研究为大规模规定的焚烧提供了工具和方法,但公众对火灾的负面看法阻碍了该地区全面消防管理计划的部署。尽管已经取得了很大成就,但消防管理仍需要进行重大变革,以使其在保护经济、社会和环境价值方面具有可持续性和最佳性。由于气候变化,澳大利亚东南部与野火相关的人类生命、财产、生物多样性和环境风险正在增加,更广泛地使用规定的焚烧对管理这些风险至关重要。该地区野火灾害的范围和发生率不断增加,这表明目前的火灾管理无法维持整个生态系统过程和生物多样性,也无法将野火对人类生命和财产的影响降低到可接受的水平。有令人信服的证据表明,更多地使用规定的燃烧来减少野火的风险和影响,而不是投入更多的资源来抑制野火。可以利用现有知识和工具有效管理规定焚烧的潜在负面影响。明确宣传规定焚烧的好处可以影响政治和公众舆论。需要在培训、人力资源和支持资源方面进行更多投资,以便安全有效地更广泛地部署规定的焚烧,以降低未来的野火风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribed burning in south-eastern Australia: history and future directions
ABSTRACT Fire has been part of the natural environment of south-eastern Australia for tens of millions of years. Aboriginal people used fire selectively, with skill, for many reasons. The removal of Aboriginal people from most of the region after European settlement changed fire regimes and the composition and structure of vegetation. This study explores the history of fire in south-eastern Australia, describes the development of prescribed burning as a forest management tool, and discusses the factors that have influenced changes in fire regimes. It draws on published and unpublished literature and data held by the Forest Fire Management Committee of the Institute of Foresters of Australia. The study finds that the use of prescribed burning in south-eastern Australia in the past 100 years has been driven primarily by political and legal factors. Since 1939, more than 50 public inquiries, reviews and royal commissions have been held into matters concerning the management of fire in landscapes, including prescribed burning. Prescribed burning has been used for wildfire mitigation, agricultural practices (such as stubble reduction and grazing land management), property protection, the maintenance of ecological processes and biodiversity conservation. Prescribed burning in the region has only ever been practised on a small percentage of forest and land each year. The study finds that a substantial body of fire and ecosystem science has been generated in the past 50 years, with rapid technological developments to support prescribed burning and fire management. Research has provided tools and methods for broadscale prescribed burning, but negative public perceptions of fire have prevented the deployment of comprehensive fire management programs in the region. Although much has been achieved, considerable changes are still required in fire management for it to be sustainable and optimal in protecting economic, social and environmental values. The risks to human lives, property, biodiversity and the environment associated with wildfire are increasing in south-eastern Australia due to climate change, and the wider use of prescribed burning is essential for managing these. The increasing extent and occurrence of wildfire disasters in the region indicates that current fire management will not sustain the full range of ecosystem processes and biodiversity, nor reduce to an acceptable level the impact of wildfires on human lives and property. There is compelling evidence for the greater use of prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risks and impacts, rather than committing increasing resources to wildfire suppression. The potential negative impacts of prescribed burning can be managed effectively using existing knowledge and tools. Clear communication of the benefits of prescribed burning can influence political and public opinion in its favour. More investment in training, human capacity and supporting resources is required to safely and effectively deploy prescribed burning more widely to reduce future wildfire risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Forestry is published by Taylor & Francis for the Institute of Foresters of Australia (IFA) for scientific, technical, and professional communication relating to forestry in the Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信