“口腔颌面外科手术后围手术期静脉注射利多卡因能减轻术后疼痛吗?”:一项随机临床试验

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s12663-022-01831-1
Vivek Kumar Mahato, Ashok Dongol, Pradeep Acharya, Anjani Kumar Yadav, Asish Subedi, Mehul R Jaisani
{"title":"“口腔颌面外科手术后围手术期静脉注射利多卡因能减轻术后疼痛吗?”:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Vivek Kumar Mahato, Ashok Dongol, Pradeep Acharya, Anjani Kumar Yadav, Asish Subedi, Mehul R Jaisani","doi":"10.1007/s12663-022-01831-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in decreasing postoperative pain after oral and maxillofacial surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients undergoing various oral and maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective, randomized, double blinded controlled trial. Lidocaine group received Lidocaine 2.0%, whereas the control group received Normal saline 0.9% infusion. Pain intensity, sedation, vitals and side effects were assessed at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were assigned to each group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the study variables at baseline. The median Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were higher in normal saline group than lidocaine group at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h and same at 12and 24 h; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Mean (± SD) analgesic consumed in lidocaine group was 47.37 (± 42.80) mg and 69.47(± 36.13) mg in saline group, which was not significant either. Similarly, no statically significant difference was observed for sedation and vitals at all the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative infusion of low dose lidocaine does not have significant effect on reduction in postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption, in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgeries. <i>Trail registered at clinicaltrials</i>.gov (NCT03479320).</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Can Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Decrease Postoperative Pain After Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries?\\\": A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Kumar Mahato, Ashok Dongol, Pradeep Acharya, Anjani Kumar Yadav, Asish Subedi, Mehul R Jaisani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-022-01831-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in decreasing postoperative pain after oral and maxillofacial surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients undergoing various oral and maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective, randomized, double blinded controlled trial. Lidocaine group received Lidocaine 2.0%, whereas the control group received Normal saline 0.9% infusion. Pain intensity, sedation, vitals and side effects were assessed at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were assigned to each group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the study variables at baseline. The median Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were higher in normal saline group than lidocaine group at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h and same at 12and 24 h; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Mean (± SD) analgesic consumed in lidocaine group was 47.37 (± 42.80) mg and 69.47(± 36.13) mg in saline group, which was not significant either. Similarly, no statically significant difference was observed for sedation and vitals at all the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative infusion of low dose lidocaine does not have significant effect on reduction in postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption, in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgeries. <i>Trail registered at clinicaltrials</i>.gov (NCT03479320).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01831-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01831-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定围手术期静脉注射利多卡因对减轻口腔颌面部手术后疼痛的疗效:在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验中,招募了 40 名在全身麻醉下接受各种口腔颌面手术的患者。利多卡因组使用 2.0% 利多卡因,对照组使用 0.9% 生理盐水。分别在术后2小时、4小时、6小时、12小时和24小时对疼痛强度、镇静效果、生命体征和副作用进行评估:每组 20 名患者。基线研究变量在各组间无明显差异。正常生理盐水组在术后 2 小时、4 小时和 6 小时的疼痛评分(NRS)中位数高于利多卡因组,在术后 12 小时和 24 小时的疼痛评分中位数相同,但差异无统计学意义。利多卡因组的平均(± SD)镇痛剂消耗量为 47.37(± 42.80)毫克,生理盐水组为 69.47(± 36.13)毫克,差异也不显著。同样,在所有时间间隔内,镇静和生命体征均无明显统计学差异:结论:围手术期输注低剂量利多卡因对降低口腔颌面部手术患者的术后疼痛强度和镇痛药消耗量没有明显效果。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03479320) 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Can Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Decrease Postoperative Pain After Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries?": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in decreasing postoperative pain after oral and maxillofacial surgeries.

Methods: Forty patients undergoing various oral and maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective, randomized, double blinded controlled trial. Lidocaine group received Lidocaine 2.0%, whereas the control group received Normal saline 0.9% infusion. Pain intensity, sedation, vitals and side effects were assessed at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: Twenty patients were assigned to each group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the study variables at baseline. The median Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were higher in normal saline group than lidocaine group at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h and same at 12and 24 h; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Mean (± SD) analgesic consumed in lidocaine group was 47.37 (± 42.80) mg and 69.47(± 36.13) mg in saline group, which was not significant either. Similarly, no statically significant difference was observed for sedation and vitals at all the time intervals.

Conclusion: Perioperative infusion of low dose lidocaine does not have significant effect on reduction in postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption, in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgeries. Trail registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03479320).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信