S. F. Gourgues, E. Fano, A. Sabaté, Elisa López Grasa, I. Caravaca, F. A. G. Vázquez, V. Vega, B. Garcia-Morante
{"title":"猪肺炎支原体暴露的雾化技术作为适应策略的评估","authors":"S. F. Gourgues, E. Fano, A. Sabaté, Elisa López Grasa, I. Caravaca, F. A. G. Vázquez, V. Vega, B. Garcia-Morante","doi":"10.54846/jshap/1180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of nebulization (NEB), also known as fogging, to expose gilts to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions as a potential acclimation strategy. Materials and methods: Phase I consisted of 448 M hyopneumoniae-free gilts from four different batches of a gilt development unit (GDU). On study day 0, batches 1 and 2 were exposed to M hyopneumoniae-positive lung homogenate via intratracheal (IT) route and were used as reference for batches 3 and 4, which were exposed using a mechanical fogger. Tracheobronchial swabs (TBS) were collected at 2 and 4 weeks post exposure (D14 and D28, respectively) and infection success was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction of pooled samples. In phase II, 1160 gilts from the same GDU belonging to three different batches (5 to 7) were exposed to M hyopneumoniae via NEB, and TBS were collected at D14. Results: In phase I, no statistically significant differences were observed between IT and NEB exposure in proportion of positives and mean cycle threshold values of TBS pooled samples at any time point (D14 and D28). In phase II, TBS pooled samples from all batches were positive for M hyopneumoniae at D14. Implications: Nebulization of lung homogenate positive for M hyopneumoniae resulted in infection of commercial gilts with this pathogen. Therefore, the use of NEB may be a reliable M hyopneumoniae exposure method under field conditions. The information generated in this investigation broadens the understanding of this technology as an acclimation strategy.","PeriodicalId":17095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of nebulization technology for gilt exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as an acclimation strategy\",\"authors\":\"S. F. Gourgues, E. Fano, A. Sabaté, Elisa López Grasa, I. Caravaca, F. A. G. Vázquez, V. Vega, B. Garcia-Morante\",\"doi\":\"10.54846/jshap/1180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of nebulization (NEB), also known as fogging, to expose gilts to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions as a potential acclimation strategy. Materials and methods: Phase I consisted of 448 M hyopneumoniae-free gilts from four different batches of a gilt development unit (GDU). On study day 0, batches 1 and 2 were exposed to M hyopneumoniae-positive lung homogenate via intratracheal (IT) route and were used as reference for batches 3 and 4, which were exposed using a mechanical fogger. Tracheobronchial swabs (TBS) were collected at 2 and 4 weeks post exposure (D14 and D28, respectively) and infection success was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction of pooled samples. In phase II, 1160 gilts from the same GDU belonging to three different batches (5 to 7) were exposed to M hyopneumoniae via NEB, and TBS were collected at D14. Results: In phase I, no statistically significant differences were observed between IT and NEB exposure in proportion of positives and mean cycle threshold values of TBS pooled samples at any time point (D14 and D28). In phase II, TBS pooled samples from all batches were positive for M hyopneumoniae at D14. Implications: Nebulization of lung homogenate positive for M hyopneumoniae resulted in infection of commercial gilts with this pathogen. Therefore, the use of NEB may be a reliable M hyopneumoniae exposure method under field conditions. The information generated in this investigation broadens the understanding of this technology as an acclimation strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Swine Health and Production\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Swine Health and Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Swine Health and Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/1180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of nebulization technology for gilt exposure to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as an acclimation strategy
Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of nebulization (NEB), also known as fogging, to expose gilts to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under field conditions as a potential acclimation strategy. Materials and methods: Phase I consisted of 448 M hyopneumoniae-free gilts from four different batches of a gilt development unit (GDU). On study day 0, batches 1 and 2 were exposed to M hyopneumoniae-positive lung homogenate via intratracheal (IT) route and were used as reference for batches 3 and 4, which were exposed using a mechanical fogger. Tracheobronchial swabs (TBS) were collected at 2 and 4 weeks post exposure (D14 and D28, respectively) and infection success was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction of pooled samples. In phase II, 1160 gilts from the same GDU belonging to three different batches (5 to 7) were exposed to M hyopneumoniae via NEB, and TBS were collected at D14. Results: In phase I, no statistically significant differences were observed between IT and NEB exposure in proportion of positives and mean cycle threshold values of TBS pooled samples at any time point (D14 and D28). In phase II, TBS pooled samples from all batches were positive for M hyopneumoniae at D14. Implications: Nebulization of lung homogenate positive for M hyopneumoniae resulted in infection of commercial gilts with this pathogen. Therefore, the use of NEB may be a reliable M hyopneumoniae exposure method under field conditions. The information generated in this investigation broadens the understanding of this technology as an acclimation strategy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Swine Health & Production (JSHAP) is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal published by the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) since 1993. The aim of the journal is the timely publication of peer-reviewed papers with a scope that encompasses the many domains of applied swine health and production, including the diagnosis, treatment, management, prevention and eradication of swine diseases, welfare & behavior, nutrition, public health, epidemiology, food safety, biosecurity, pharmaceuticals, antimicrobial use and resistance, reproduction, growth, systems flow, economics, and facility design. The journal provides a platform for researchers, veterinary practitioners, academics, and students to share their work with an international audience. The journal publishes information that contains an applied and practical focus and presents scientific information that is accessible to the busy veterinary practitioner as well as to the research and academic community. Hence, manuscripts with an applied focus are considered for publication, and the journal publishes original research, brief communications, case reports/series, literature reviews, commentaries, diagnostic notes, production tools, and practice tips. All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Swine Health & Production are peer-reviewed.