C. A. Copenheaver, Saskia L. van de Gevel, Adam K. Downing, T. A. Coates
{"title":"减少与学生实地研究期间性行为不端的风险","authors":"C. A. Copenheaver, Saskia L. van de Gevel, Adam K. Downing, T. A. Coates","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many research teams that work at remote field sites include undergraduate and graduate students. It is the responsibility of project directors to be informed about the frequency of sexual misconduct among research teams and to implement best practices and policies to reduce the risk of sexual misconduct. Students and other individuals from lower positions of power experience higher rates of sexual misconduct when participating in research at remote locations. Our research group hosted a two-day focus group with experienced researchers and administrators from academia, government agencies, and biological field stations to identify best practices and policies that reduce the risk of sexual misconduct for members of research teams working at remote locations. The participants identified 43 best practices and policies with 15 items rated as “essential,” 27 items rated as “very important,” and one item rated as “somewhat important.” The focus group participants identified codes of conduct as an essential tool for defining sexual misconduct, clearly stating behavioral expectations, establishing a review process for potential violations, and enforcing penalties for violators. The code of conduct must be shared with research team members prior to departure to the field site and be revisited multiple times throughout the research experience. All members of the research team must be able to trust that reports of sexual misconduct will be fairly evaluated by leadership and violations will result in consequences for the responsible individuals. Reducing the risk of sexual misconduct among remote research teams requires conscious effort and actions from administrators and research directors.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"117 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing the Risk of Sexual Misconduct during Field Research with Students\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Copenheaver, Saskia L. van de Gevel, Adam K. Downing, T. A. Coates\",\"doi\":\"10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Many research teams that work at remote field sites include undergraduate and graduate students. It is the responsibility of project directors to be informed about the frequency of sexual misconduct among research teams and to implement best practices and policies to reduce the risk of sexual misconduct. Students and other individuals from lower positions of power experience higher rates of sexual misconduct when participating in research at remote locations. Our research group hosted a two-day focus group with experienced researchers and administrators from academia, government agencies, and biological field stations to identify best practices and policies that reduce the risk of sexual misconduct for members of research teams working at remote locations. The participants identified 43 best practices and policies with 15 items rated as “essential,” 27 items rated as “very important,” and one item rated as “somewhat important.” The focus group participants identified codes of conduct as an essential tool for defining sexual misconduct, clearly stating behavioral expectations, establishing a review process for potential violations, and enforcing penalties for violators. The code of conduct must be shared with research team members prior to departure to the field site and be revisited multiple times throughout the research experience. All members of the research team must be able to trust that reports of sexual misconduct will be fairly evaluated by leadership and violations will result in consequences for the responsible individuals. Reducing the risk of sexual misconduct among remote research teams requires conscious effort and actions from administrators and research directors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.2.117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reducing the Risk of Sexual Misconduct during Field Research with Students
ABSTRACT Many research teams that work at remote field sites include undergraduate and graduate students. It is the responsibility of project directors to be informed about the frequency of sexual misconduct among research teams and to implement best practices and policies to reduce the risk of sexual misconduct. Students and other individuals from lower positions of power experience higher rates of sexual misconduct when participating in research at remote locations. Our research group hosted a two-day focus group with experienced researchers and administrators from academia, government agencies, and biological field stations to identify best practices and policies that reduce the risk of sexual misconduct for members of research teams working at remote locations. The participants identified 43 best practices and policies with 15 items rated as “essential,” 27 items rated as “very important,” and one item rated as “somewhat important.” The focus group participants identified codes of conduct as an essential tool for defining sexual misconduct, clearly stating behavioral expectations, establishing a review process for potential violations, and enforcing penalties for violators. The code of conduct must be shared with research team members prior to departure to the field site and be revisited multiple times throughout the research experience. All members of the research team must be able to trust that reports of sexual misconduct will be fairly evaluated by leadership and violations will result in consequences for the responsible individuals. Reducing the risk of sexual misconduct among remote research teams requires conscious effort and actions from administrators and research directors.
期刊介绍:
The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation.
The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as:
-Applied conservation biology-
Ecological restoration-
Natural areas management-
Ecological assessment and monitoring-
Invasive and exotic species management-
Habitat protection-
Fire ecology.
It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.