既然其他人都恐慌了,好吧,我不得不恐慌:监管重点预示着COVID-19期间的恐慌性购买

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS
G. Ross
{"title":"既然其他人都恐慌了,好吧,我不得不恐慌:监管重点预示着COVID-19期间的恐慌性购买","authors":"G. Ross","doi":"10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper was to identify social and behavioral factors responsible for panic buying during global pandemics such as COVID-19.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAccording to regulatory focus theory, behavior of individuals is regulated by two motivational systems – prevention and promotion. Prevention-focused behavior is motivated by security and safety needs and is associated with a strategic preference for vigilant means of goal pursuit. Prevention-focused vigilance is reflected in unwillingness to take risks and low ability to cope with uncertain environments and changing conditions. Promotion-focused behavior is motivated by growth and self-development needs and is associated with a strategic preference for eager means of goal pursuit. Promotion-focused eagerness is reflected in willingness to take risks and high ability to cope with uncertainty and change. Two studies tested the notion that panic buying during public health crises such as COVID-19 is related to the strength of the prevention system, perceived scarcity of products, perceived threat of the disease, age and gender.\n\n\nFindings\nStudy 1 showed that the higher the perceived scarcity of products, the higher was the probability that panic buying would set in. Yet, different patterns emerged for men and women. Among women, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among men, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect. Study 2 showed that the higher the perceived threat of the disease, the higher was the probability that panic buying would occur. However, different patterns were observed with age. Among older adults, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among young adults, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nImplications to address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics are discussed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy applying the theory of regulatory focus to consumer marketing, this research helps to identify marketing strategies to manage panic buying and develop contingency plans that address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics.\n","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Now that everyone else has panicked, well… I have to panic: regulatory focus predicts panic buying during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"G. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper was to identify social and behavioral factors responsible for panic buying during global pandemics such as COVID-19.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAccording to regulatory focus theory, behavior of individuals is regulated by two motivational systems – prevention and promotion. Prevention-focused behavior is motivated by security and safety needs and is associated with a strategic preference for vigilant means of goal pursuit. Prevention-focused vigilance is reflected in unwillingness to take risks and low ability to cope with uncertain environments and changing conditions. Promotion-focused behavior is motivated by growth and self-development needs and is associated with a strategic preference for eager means of goal pursuit. Promotion-focused eagerness is reflected in willingness to take risks and high ability to cope with uncertainty and change. Two studies tested the notion that panic buying during public health crises such as COVID-19 is related to the strength of the prevention system, perceived scarcity of products, perceived threat of the disease, age and gender.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nStudy 1 showed that the higher the perceived scarcity of products, the higher was the probability that panic buying would set in. Yet, different patterns emerged for men and women. Among women, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among men, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect. Study 2 showed that the higher the perceived threat of the disease, the higher was the probability that panic buying would occur. However, different patterns were observed with age. Among older adults, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among young adults, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nImplications to address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics are discussed.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nBy applying the theory of regulatory focus to consumer marketing, this research helps to identify marketing strategies to manage panic buying and develop contingency plans that address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文的目的是确定在COVID-19等全球大流行期间导致恐慌性购买的社会和行为因素。设计/方法/方法根据调节焦点理论,个人的行为受两个动机系统——预防和促进——的调节。以预防为重点的行为是出于安全和安保需求,并与追求目标的警惕手段的战略偏好有关。以预防为重点的警惕体现在不愿冒险和应对不确定环境和不断变化的条件的能力低下。以晋升为重点的行为是由成长和自我发展需求驱动的,并与追求目标的迫切手段的战略偏好有关。注重晋升的渴望体现在敢于冒险的意愿和应对不确定性和变化的高度能力上。两项研究检验了新冠肺炎等公共卫生危机期间的恐慌性购买与预防系统的力量、产品的稀缺性、疾病的威胁性、年龄和性别有关的观点。调查结果研究1表明,人们对产品稀缺性的感知越高,恐慌性购买的可能性就越高。然而,男性和女性出现了不同的模式。在妇女中,预防重点越强,效果就越强。相比之下,男性的预防重点越强,效果就越弱。研究2表明,人们对这种疾病的威胁感知得越高,恐慌性购买发生的可能性就越高。然而,随着年龄的增长,观察到了不同的模式。在老年人中,预防重点越强,效果就越强。相比之下,在年轻人中,预防重点越强,效果就越弱。研究局限性/含义讨论了在未来流行病期间解决不稳定消费者行为的意义。独创性/价值通过将监管重点理论应用于消费者营销,本研究有助于确定管理恐慌性购买的营销策略,并制定应对未来疫情期间不稳定消费者行为的应急计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Now that everyone else has panicked, well… I have to panic: regulatory focus predicts panic buying during COVID-19
Purpose The purpose of this paper was to identify social and behavioral factors responsible for panic buying during global pandemics such as COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach According to regulatory focus theory, behavior of individuals is regulated by two motivational systems – prevention and promotion. Prevention-focused behavior is motivated by security and safety needs and is associated with a strategic preference for vigilant means of goal pursuit. Prevention-focused vigilance is reflected in unwillingness to take risks and low ability to cope with uncertain environments and changing conditions. Promotion-focused behavior is motivated by growth and self-development needs and is associated with a strategic preference for eager means of goal pursuit. Promotion-focused eagerness is reflected in willingness to take risks and high ability to cope with uncertainty and change. Two studies tested the notion that panic buying during public health crises such as COVID-19 is related to the strength of the prevention system, perceived scarcity of products, perceived threat of the disease, age and gender. Findings Study 1 showed that the higher the perceived scarcity of products, the higher was the probability that panic buying would set in. Yet, different patterns emerged for men and women. Among women, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among men, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect. Study 2 showed that the higher the perceived threat of the disease, the higher was the probability that panic buying would occur. However, different patterns were observed with age. Among older adults, the stronger the prevention focus, the stronger was the effect. Among young adults, by contrast, the stronger the prevention focus, the weaker was the effect. Research limitations/implications Implications to address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics are discussed. Originality/value By applying the theory of regulatory focus to consumer marketing, this research helps to identify marketing strategies to manage panic buying and develop contingency plans that address erratic consumer behavior during future pandemics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信