灰色或虚无:黑暗和没有伦理的本体论的危险

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Clifton L. Granby
{"title":"灰色或虚无:黑暗和没有伦理的本体论的危险","authors":"Clifton L. Granby","doi":"10.1080/14769948.2023.2180130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the enduring relevance of Victor Anderson’s Beyond Ontological Blackness: An Essay in Religious and Cultural Criticism. Anderson rightly senses a close connection between the practice of African American cultural criticism and the ethical sensitivity required to do it well. He also recognizes the historical limits of ontological inquiry. I argue that these metaphilosophical assumptions afford more generative encounters with Black political and cultural life, especially its discursive ambiguities and practical incongruities. By engaging the writings of two contemporary critics, Tamura Lomax and Calvin Warren, I show the benefits of thinking alongside Anderson’s important text and the dangers of not doing so. Scholars of religion, African American studies, and cultural studies ignore Anderson’s work and the discourses it enjoins at their own peril.","PeriodicalId":42729,"journal":{"name":"BLACK THEOLOGY","volume":"21 1","pages":"47 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grey or Nothing: Blackness and the Perils of Ontology Without Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Clifton L. Granby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14769948.2023.2180130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines the enduring relevance of Victor Anderson’s Beyond Ontological Blackness: An Essay in Religious and Cultural Criticism. Anderson rightly senses a close connection between the practice of African American cultural criticism and the ethical sensitivity required to do it well. He also recognizes the historical limits of ontological inquiry. I argue that these metaphilosophical assumptions afford more generative encounters with Black political and cultural life, especially its discursive ambiguities and practical incongruities. By engaging the writings of two contemporary critics, Tamura Lomax and Calvin Warren, I show the benefits of thinking alongside Anderson’s important text and the dangers of not doing so. Scholars of religion, African American studies, and cultural studies ignore Anderson’s work and the discourses it enjoins at their own peril.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2023.2180130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2023.2180130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了维克多·安德森的《超越本体论的黑色:宗教与文化批评随笔》的持久相关性。安德森正确地意识到非裔美国人文化批评的实践与做好它所需要的伦理敏感性之间的密切联系。他也认识到本体论研究的历史局限性。我认为,这些形而上学的假设提供了更多与黑人政治和文化生活,特别是其话语的模糊性和实践的不一致性产生接触。通过引用两位当代评论家——田村洛马克斯(Tamura Lomax)和加尔文沃伦(Calvin Warren)的作品,我展示了与安德森的重要文本一起思考的好处,以及不这样做的危险。宗教学者、非裔美国人研究学者和文化研究学者忽视了安德森的著作和它所要求的论述,这将给他们自己带来危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grey or Nothing: Blackness and the Perils of Ontology Without Ethics
ABSTRACT This article examines the enduring relevance of Victor Anderson’s Beyond Ontological Blackness: An Essay in Religious and Cultural Criticism. Anderson rightly senses a close connection between the practice of African American cultural criticism and the ethical sensitivity required to do it well. He also recognizes the historical limits of ontological inquiry. I argue that these metaphilosophical assumptions afford more generative encounters with Black political and cultural life, especially its discursive ambiguities and practical incongruities. By engaging the writings of two contemporary critics, Tamura Lomax and Calvin Warren, I show the benefits of thinking alongside Anderson’s important text and the dangers of not doing so. Scholars of religion, African American studies, and cultural studies ignore Anderson’s work and the discourses it enjoins at their own peril.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK THEOLOGY
BLACK THEOLOGY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信