对在线定价的行为反应:经验和管理见解

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
G. Kalyanaram, Gordhan K. Saini, S. Mony, N. Jayasankaran
{"title":"对在线定价的行为反应:经验和管理见解","authors":"G. Kalyanaram, Gordhan K. Saini, S. Mony, N. Jayasankaran","doi":"10.1108/jibr-07-2021-0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPricing is always a fundamental marketing element. In the digital marketing/e-commerce context, there are two universal phenomena: desire to micro-segment and customize, and the adverse reaction upon unfair perception of price. A third related question is how should firms consider price increases and decreases? Specifically, this paper aims to address the following three research and practice questions: What are the theoretical underpinnings of perception of fairness/unfairness in pricing, and what are the findings? What are the theoretical underpinnings of response to price increases and decreases? What should be online pricing strategy, consistent with the findings on (un)fairness perception of pricing and response to price increases and decreases?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe present approach is integrative review and critical analyses, and synthesis. The review dates back to 1960s, and is inter-disciplinary, including apposite findings in behavioral science, economics, marketing and operations management/research. The authors search for insights with significant empirical support to address these questions.\n\n\nFindings\nPerception of unfair price impacts consumer choice, probability of purchase, intent to buy and attitude to product/service/firm adversely. Consumers react differently to perceived unfair and fair prices. Consumers react more strongly and negatively to perceived unfair prices (compared to prices perceived to be fair) in their intent to buy and other related metrics. Consumers react differently to price increases and price decreases relative to the reference price. Consumers react more strongly to price increases than to price decreases. There is substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of loss-aversion effect, depending on the product/service category and estimation methods.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors review and discuss potential viable pricing strategies. Based on the generalizable findings, this study provides actionable insights to managers for pricing in digital marketing context. Also, the authors provide useful directions for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral response to online pricing: empirical and managerial insights\",\"authors\":\"G. Kalyanaram, Gordhan K. Saini, S. Mony, N. Jayasankaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jibr-07-2021-0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPricing is always a fundamental marketing element. In the digital marketing/e-commerce context, there are two universal phenomena: desire to micro-segment and customize, and the adverse reaction upon unfair perception of price. A third related question is how should firms consider price increases and decreases? Specifically, this paper aims to address the following three research and practice questions: What are the theoretical underpinnings of perception of fairness/unfairness in pricing, and what are the findings? What are the theoretical underpinnings of response to price increases and decreases? What should be online pricing strategy, consistent with the findings on (un)fairness perception of pricing and response to price increases and decreases?\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe present approach is integrative review and critical analyses, and synthesis. The review dates back to 1960s, and is inter-disciplinary, including apposite findings in behavioral science, economics, marketing and operations management/research. The authors search for insights with significant empirical support to address these questions.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nPerception of unfair price impacts consumer choice, probability of purchase, intent to buy and attitude to product/service/firm adversely. Consumers react differently to perceived unfair and fair prices. Consumers react more strongly and negatively to perceived unfair prices (compared to prices perceived to be fair) in their intent to buy and other related metrics. Consumers react differently to price increases and price decreases relative to the reference price. Consumers react more strongly to price increases than to price decreases. There is substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of loss-aversion effect, depending on the product/service category and estimation methods.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe authors review and discuss potential viable pricing strategies. Based on the generalizable findings, this study provides actionable insights to managers for pricing in digital marketing context. Also, the authors provide useful directions for future research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Business Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-07-2021-0281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-07-2021-0281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的定价始终是一个基本的营销要素。在数字营销/电子商务背景下,存在两种普遍现象:对细分和定制的渴望,以及对价格不公平感知的不利反应。第三个相关问题是,企业应该如何考虑价格的上涨和下跌?具体而言,本文旨在解决以下三个研究和实践问题:定价公平/不公平感知的理论基础是什么,研究结果是什么?应对价格上涨和下跌的理论基础是什么?在线定价策略应该是什么,与对定价的(不)公平感知以及对价格上涨和下跌的反应的调查结果一致?设计/方法论/方法目前的方法是综合审查、批判性分析和综合。这篇综述可以追溯到20世纪60年代,是跨学科的,包括行为科学、经济学、市场营销和运营管理/研究方面的恰当发现。作者寻求具有重要实证支持的见解来解决这些问题。发现对不公平价格的感知会对消费者的选择、购买概率、购买意愿以及对产品/服务/公司的态度产生不利影响。消费者对不公平和公平价格的反应不同。消费者在购买意愿和其他相关指标中对感知到的不公平价格(与感知到的公平价格相比)反应更强烈、更消极。相对于参考价格,消费者对价格上涨和价格下跌的反应不同。消费者对价格上涨的反应比对价格下跌的反应更强烈。损失规避效应的大小存在很大的异质性,这取决于产品/服务类别和估计方法。原创性/价值作者回顾并讨论了潜在的可行定价策略。基于可推广的发现,本研究为数字营销环境下的定价管理者提供了可操作的见解。此外,作者还为未来的研究提供了有用的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioral response to online pricing: empirical and managerial insights
Purpose Pricing is always a fundamental marketing element. In the digital marketing/e-commerce context, there are two universal phenomena: desire to micro-segment and customize, and the adverse reaction upon unfair perception of price. A third related question is how should firms consider price increases and decreases? Specifically, this paper aims to address the following three research and practice questions: What are the theoretical underpinnings of perception of fairness/unfairness in pricing, and what are the findings? What are the theoretical underpinnings of response to price increases and decreases? What should be online pricing strategy, consistent with the findings on (un)fairness perception of pricing and response to price increases and decreases? Design/methodology/approach The present approach is integrative review and critical analyses, and synthesis. The review dates back to 1960s, and is inter-disciplinary, including apposite findings in behavioral science, economics, marketing and operations management/research. The authors search for insights with significant empirical support to address these questions. Findings Perception of unfair price impacts consumer choice, probability of purchase, intent to buy and attitude to product/service/firm adversely. Consumers react differently to perceived unfair and fair prices. Consumers react more strongly and negatively to perceived unfair prices (compared to prices perceived to be fair) in their intent to buy and other related metrics. Consumers react differently to price increases and price decreases relative to the reference price. Consumers react more strongly to price increases than to price decreases. There is substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of loss-aversion effect, depending on the product/service category and estimation methods. Originality/value The authors review and discuss potential viable pricing strategies. Based on the generalizable findings, this study provides actionable insights to managers for pricing in digital marketing context. Also, the authors provide useful directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信