论语用成分的性质

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Roberto Graci
{"title":"论语用成分的性质","authors":"Roberto Graci","doi":"10.1075/ps.21001.gra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present article focuses on certain points in the semantics/pragmatics debate. Among these, one of the most\n interesting is the possibility of reconciling, independent of the context, certain aspects of meaning which have always been the\n subject of discussion in formal semantics, with the view that meaning is socially and situationally conditioned. Recent new\n insights concerning the importance of pragmatics for enriching the propositional content of the utterance should not lead to a\n radical contextualism that denies the assignment of any role at all to semantics. Instead, it is possible to argue that both\n dimensions, semantics and pragmatics, along with their constituent parts, offer fundamental contributions to the transmission and\n understanding of the overall meaning of a (spoken or written) text.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nature of pragmatic constituents\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Graci\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ps.21001.gra\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The present article focuses on certain points in the semantics/pragmatics debate. Among these, one of the most\\n interesting is the possibility of reconciling, independent of the context, certain aspects of meaning which have always been the\\n subject of discussion in formal semantics, with the view that meaning is socially and situationally conditioned. Recent new\\n insights concerning the importance of pragmatics for enriching the propositional content of the utterance should not lead to a\\n radical contextualism that denies the assignment of any role at all to semantics. Instead, it is possible to argue that both\\n dimensions, semantics and pragmatics, along with their constituent parts, offer fundamental contributions to the transmission and\\n understanding of the overall meaning of a (spoken or written) text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21001.gra\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21001.gra","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着重讨论了语义学/语用学争论中的一些问题。其中,最有趣的是,独立于上下文,调和意义的某些方面的可能性,这些方面一直是形式语义学中讨论的主题,认为意义是社会和情境条件的。最近关于语用学对丰富话语命题内容的重要性的新见解不应导致一种激进的语境主义,这种语境主义根本否认赋予语义任何角色。相反,有可能认为,语义和语用学这两个维度及其组成部分,都对(口语或书面)文本的整体意义的传递和理解做出了根本贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the nature of pragmatic constituents
The present article focuses on certain points in the semantics/pragmatics debate. Among these, one of the most interesting is the possibility of reconciling, independent of the context, certain aspects of meaning which have always been the subject of discussion in formal semantics, with the view that meaning is socially and situationally conditioned. Recent new insights concerning the importance of pragmatics for enriching the propositional content of the utterance should not lead to a radical contextualism that denies the assignment of any role at all to semantics. Instead, it is possible to argue that both dimensions, semantics and pragmatics, along with their constituent parts, offer fundamental contributions to the transmission and understanding of the overall meaning of a (spoken or written) text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信