供应链绩效评价模型的文献综述

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Imadeddine Oubrahim, N. Sefiani, A. Happonen
{"title":"供应链绩效评价模型的文献综述","authors":"Imadeddine Oubrahim, N. Sefiani, A. Happonen","doi":"10.22306/al.v9i2.298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our structured literature review reveals the current state-of-the-art supply chain performance evaluation models (SCPEMs) from the last 21 years of research. Seventy related papers from the 2000 to 2021 time period were found to contribute by using ISI and SCOPUS databases. This paper has classified SCPEMs in terms of focus area and the perspective considered (financial and non-financial). With the analysis, these models’ applicability in today’s business environment pinpointed the most usable models and their current shortcomings. Findings disclose current SCPEMs limitations and misalignments with the emerging disruptive technologies observed in today’s supply chains. Given the findings, this study has highlighted the lack of overall supply chain performance evaluation and the failure to underline the underperforming decision criteria in the SC network. Therefore, to tackle these gaps, the authors have suggested visibility, leagility, collaboration, digitalization, sustainability, and integration as SCM characteristics to be considered in the future when developing a novel SCPEM. Finally, this study can be used as guidance for future studies.","PeriodicalId":36880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Logistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODELS: A LITERATURE REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Imadeddine Oubrahim, N. Sefiani, A. Happonen\",\"doi\":\"10.22306/al.v9i2.298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our structured literature review reveals the current state-of-the-art supply chain performance evaluation models (SCPEMs) from the last 21 years of research. Seventy related papers from the 2000 to 2021 time period were found to contribute by using ISI and SCOPUS databases. This paper has classified SCPEMs in terms of focus area and the perspective considered (financial and non-financial). With the analysis, these models’ applicability in today’s business environment pinpointed the most usable models and their current shortcomings. Findings disclose current SCPEMs limitations and misalignments with the emerging disruptive technologies observed in today’s supply chains. Given the findings, this study has highlighted the lack of overall supply chain performance evaluation and the failure to underline the underperforming decision criteria in the SC network. Therefore, to tackle these gaps, the authors have suggested visibility, leagility, collaboration, digitalization, sustainability, and integration as SCM characteristics to be considered in the future when developing a novel SCPEM. Finally, this study can be used as guidance for future studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i2.298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Logistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i2.298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

我们的结构化文献综述揭示了过去21年研究中当前最先进的供应链绩效评估模型(SCPEMs)。通过ISI和SCOPUS数据库检索到2000年至2021年期间的70篇相关论文。本文从关注的领域和考虑的视角(财务和非财务)两方面对SCPEMs进行了分类。通过分析,这些模型在当今业务环境中的适用性确定了最有用的模型及其当前的缺点。研究结果揭示了当前SCPEMs的局限性和与当今供应链中观察到的新兴颠覆性技术的错位。鉴于这些发现,本研究强调了缺乏整体供应链绩效评估和未能强调供应链网络中表现不佳的决策标准。因此,为了解决这些差距,作者建议在未来开发新的SCPEM时,将可见性、灵活性、协作性、数字化、可持续性和集成作为SCM特征来考虑。最后,本研究可以为今后的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODELS: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Our structured literature review reveals the current state-of-the-art supply chain performance evaluation models (SCPEMs) from the last 21 years of research. Seventy related papers from the 2000 to 2021 time period were found to contribute by using ISI and SCOPUS databases. This paper has classified SCPEMs in terms of focus area and the perspective considered (financial and non-financial). With the analysis, these models’ applicability in today’s business environment pinpointed the most usable models and their current shortcomings. Findings disclose current SCPEMs limitations and misalignments with the emerging disruptive technologies observed in today’s supply chains. Given the findings, this study has highlighted the lack of overall supply chain performance evaluation and the failure to underline the underperforming decision criteria in the SC network. Therefore, to tackle these gaps, the authors have suggested visibility, leagility, collaboration, digitalization, sustainability, and integration as SCM characteristics to be considered in the future when developing a novel SCPEM. Finally, this study can be used as guidance for future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Logistica
Acta Logistica Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信