大前庭神经鞘瘤的低分割立体定向放疗及放疗前减容手术对剂量学和临床结果的影响

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
M. Mallory, K. Kauweloa, H. Staecker, P. Camarata, R. Chamoun, Rishi Neeranjun, R. Badkul, M. Tennapel, Shary Shelton, Fen Wang
{"title":"大前庭神经鞘瘤的低分割立体定向放疗及放疗前减容手术对剂量学和临床结果的影响","authors":"M. Mallory, K. Kauweloa, H. Staecker, P. Camarata, R. Chamoun, Rishi Neeranjun, R. Badkul, M. Tennapel, Shary Shelton, Fen Wang","doi":"10.1017/S1460396922000383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with large (>2 cm in great diameter) vestibular schwannomas (VSs) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) compared to small (<2 cm) ones and the impact of debulking surgery prior to radiation for large VSs. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with VSs treated with HFSRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) were evaluated by tumour size and surgical status. Patients were divided based on tumour size: small VSs (n = 42) and large VSs (n = 17). The large group was further divided into the groups of pre-treatment debulking surgery (n = 8) and no surgery (n = 9). Rates of tumour control, brainstem necrosis and neurologic dysfunction were assessed following treatment. Pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to generate hypothetical HFSRT plans to compare the effect of debulking surgery on dosimetry. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling was performed to compare toxicity probabilities with and without surgical debulking in large VSs. Results: There was no statistical difference of tumour control rate between small and large VSs with 100% for small tumours and 94·1% for large tumours (p = 0·12), respectively. In large VSs patient, the tumour control rate of HFSRT was 100% (8/8) for surgically debulked patients and 89% (8/9) for non-surgically debulked patients (p = 0·35). There were no patients who experienced brainstem necrosis or progression of facial and trigeminal nerve symptoms after HFSRT in the entire groups of patients. Surgical debulking large VSs did not change the maximum point dose of brainstem (p = 0·98), but significantly decreased volumes of VSs and changed the minimum dose to the hottest 0·5 cc of tumour (p = 0·016) as well as the volume receiving at least 23 Gy (p = 0·023). NTCP modelling revealed very low rates (average < 1%) of brainstem toxicity with or without surgical debulking, but there was a significant difference favoring surgery (p < 0·05). Conclusions: HFSRT is a safe and effective treatment for both small and large VSs and is a viable option for patients with large VSs who cannot undergo surgery, if NTCP of pre-debulking HFSRT dosimetry is lower.","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large vestibular schwannomas and the impact of pre-radiation debulking surgery on dosimetry and clinical outcomes\",\"authors\":\"M. Mallory, K. Kauweloa, H. Staecker, P. Camarata, R. Chamoun, Rishi Neeranjun, R. Badkul, M. Tennapel, Shary Shelton, Fen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1460396922000383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with large (>2 cm in great diameter) vestibular schwannomas (VSs) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) compared to small (<2 cm) ones and the impact of debulking surgery prior to radiation for large VSs. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with VSs treated with HFSRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) were evaluated by tumour size and surgical status. Patients were divided based on tumour size: small VSs (n = 42) and large VSs (n = 17). The large group was further divided into the groups of pre-treatment debulking surgery (n = 8) and no surgery (n = 9). Rates of tumour control, brainstem necrosis and neurologic dysfunction were assessed following treatment. Pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to generate hypothetical HFSRT plans to compare the effect of debulking surgery on dosimetry. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling was performed to compare toxicity probabilities with and without surgical debulking in large VSs. Results: There was no statistical difference of tumour control rate between small and large VSs with 100% for small tumours and 94·1% for large tumours (p = 0·12), respectively. In large VSs patient, the tumour control rate of HFSRT was 100% (8/8) for surgically debulked patients and 89% (8/9) for non-surgically debulked patients (p = 0·35). There were no patients who experienced brainstem necrosis or progression of facial and trigeminal nerve symptoms after HFSRT in the entire groups of patients. Surgical debulking large VSs did not change the maximum point dose of brainstem (p = 0·98), but significantly decreased volumes of VSs and changed the minimum dose to the hottest 0·5 cc of tumour (p = 0·016) as well as the volume receiving at least 23 Gy (p = 0·023). NTCP modelling revealed very low rates (average < 1%) of brainstem toxicity with or without surgical debulking, but there was a significant difference favoring surgery (p < 0·05). Conclusions: HFSRT is a safe and effective treatment for both small and large VSs and is a viable option for patients with large VSs who cannot undergo surgery, if NTCP of pre-debulking HFSRT dosimetry is lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396922000383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396922000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介:本研究旨在评估低分割立体定向放射治疗(HFSRT)治疗大(直径>2cm)前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)患者与小(<2cm)前庭神经鞘瘤患者的疗效,以及在放疗前对大前庭神经鞘癌进行减瘤手术的影响。方法:通过肿瘤大小和手术状态对59例VSs患者进行HFSRT(25 Gy,5个部分)治疗。根据肿瘤大小将患者分为:小VS(n=42)和大VS(n=17)。大组进一步分为治疗前拆散手术组(n=8)和未手术组(n=9)。治疗后评估肿瘤控制率、脑干坏死率和神经功能障碍率。术前磁共振成像(MRI)用于生成假设的HFSRT计划,以比较拆封手术对剂量测定的影响。对大VS进行正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)建模,以比较有无手术减毒的毒性概率。结果:小VS和大VS的肿瘤控制率无统计学差异,小肿瘤为100%,大肿瘤为94.1%(p=0.12)。在大VSs患者中,HFSRT对手术切除患者的肿瘤控制率为100%(8/8),对非手术切除患者为89%(8/9)(p=0.35)。在整个患者组中,没有出现HFSRT后脑干坏死或面部和三叉神经症状进展的患者。手术切除大的VSs并没有改变脑干的最大点剂量(p=0.98),但显著降低了VSs的体积,并将最小剂量改变为肿瘤最热的0.5cc(p=0.016)以及至少接受23Gy的体积(p=0.023)。NTCP模型显示,无论是否进行手术,脑干毒性的发生率都很低(平均<1%),但有利于手术的发生率存在显著差异(p<0.05)。结论:HFSRT是一种安全有效的治疗小VSs和大VSs的方法,如果预揭穿HFSRT剂量的NTCP较低,对于不能接受手术的大VSs患者来说是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large vestibular schwannomas and the impact of pre-radiation debulking surgery on dosimetry and clinical outcomes
Abstract Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with large (>2 cm in great diameter) vestibular schwannomas (VSs) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) compared to small (<2 cm) ones and the impact of debulking surgery prior to radiation for large VSs. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with VSs treated with HFSRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) were evaluated by tumour size and surgical status. Patients were divided based on tumour size: small VSs (n = 42) and large VSs (n = 17). The large group was further divided into the groups of pre-treatment debulking surgery (n = 8) and no surgery (n = 9). Rates of tumour control, brainstem necrosis and neurologic dysfunction were assessed following treatment. Pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to generate hypothetical HFSRT plans to compare the effect of debulking surgery on dosimetry. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling was performed to compare toxicity probabilities with and without surgical debulking in large VSs. Results: There was no statistical difference of tumour control rate between small and large VSs with 100% for small tumours and 94·1% for large tumours (p = 0·12), respectively. In large VSs patient, the tumour control rate of HFSRT was 100% (8/8) for surgically debulked patients and 89% (8/9) for non-surgically debulked patients (p = 0·35). There were no patients who experienced brainstem necrosis or progression of facial and trigeminal nerve symptoms after HFSRT in the entire groups of patients. Surgical debulking large VSs did not change the maximum point dose of brainstem (p = 0·98), but significantly decreased volumes of VSs and changed the minimum dose to the hottest 0·5 cc of tumour (p = 0·016) as well as the volume receiving at least 23 Gy (p = 0·023). NTCP modelling revealed very low rates (average < 1%) of brainstem toxicity with or without surgical debulking, but there was a significant difference favoring surgery (p < 0·05). Conclusions: HFSRT is a safe and effective treatment for both small and large VSs and is a viable option for patients with large VSs who cannot undergo surgery, if NTCP of pre-debulking HFSRT dosimetry is lower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信